It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 7:37 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I'm sure the Bulls will get better but why they let Nate go is a mystery to me.
I would have loved to see him come off the bench and give you instant energy and a decent scoring threat who can create his own shot.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Because Nate is gonna Nate and he wasn't going to getting the minutes he was getting last year. Nate is good at getting his own shot and scoring not so good at running the offense for stretches when Rose is on the bench. Plus the Bulls are up against the cap and figured it was better to spend money on a wing who can shoot 3's which is why we have Dunleavy

Image

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43567
Phil McCracken wrote:
Plus the Bulls are up against the cap and figured it was better to spend money on a wing who can shoot 3's which is why we have Dunleavy

:lol: :lol:

They had to cut him loose because of the cap, and there was no way they were going to carry 4 PG's (even though they are doing that right now)

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Douchebag wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Plus the Bulls are up against the cap and figured it was better to spend money on a wing who can shoot 3's which is why we have Dunleavy

:lol: :lol:

They had to cut him loose because of the cap, and there was no way they were going to carry 4 PG's (even though they are doing that right now)

Thibs LOVES Dunleavy's legnth

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Phil McCracken wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Phil McCracken wrote:
Plus the Bulls are up against the cap and figured it was better to spend money on a wing who can shoot 3's which is why we have Dunleavy

:lol: :lol:

They had to cut him loose because of the cap, and there was no way they were going to carry 4 PG's (even though they are doing that right now)

Thibs LOVES Dunleavy's legnth


By cracky.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group