Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

long time guy
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=93210
Page 1 of 2

Author:  IMU [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:11 pm ]
Post subject:  long time guy

E'Twaun Moore is playing point guard. Right meow.

Author:  Darkside [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

I'm sorry... did you just say meow?

Author:  IMU [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

E'Twaun Moore is making MCW look silly. Stacey King saying MOORE GOTTA GET MORE MINUTES

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

I've been asleep. Has Hinrich played? If he hasn't then that would explain it.

Author:  IMU [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

Darkside wrote:
I'm sorry... did you just say meow?

Don't think boy meow do you know how fast you were going?
long time guy wrote:
I've been asleep. Has Hinrich played? If he hasn't then that would explain it.

Wait, what would explain it?

Why would a small forward get minutes if a point guard isn't playing?

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

Moore is not that good. I know that hasn't stopped you from singing his praises before.

Author:  IMU [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

long time guy wrote:
Moore is not that good. I know that hasn't stopped you from singing his praises before.

Aren't your two favorite people Sam Smith and Stacey King?

Sam Smith calls Moore a point guard, and Stacey King says he needs to play more.

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

IMU wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I'm sorry... did you just say meow?

Don't think boy meow do you know how fast you were going?
long time guy wrote:
I've been asleep. Has Hinrich played? If he hasn't then that would explain it.

Wait, what would explain it?

Why would a small forward get minutes if a point guard isn't playing?


You can't be this dense. Maybe you can. If Rose and Hinrich are out someone has to be the backup. If not E' then who? If not now when?

Author:  IMU [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

I'm glad you fully agree that the fourth point guard on the team, a guy that was known as a combo guard even during his Purdue days, should play point guard when other point guards are hurt.

This is where we high five!

Image

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Moore is not that good. I know that hasn't stopped you from singing his praises before.

Aren't your two favorite people Sam Smith and Stacey King?

Sam Smith calls Moore a point guard, and Stacey King says he needs to play more.
If there is more of Moore going forward the Bulls are in a whole lot of trouble. You do realize you're singing the praises of a career journeyman.

Author:  IkeSouth [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

Get the fuck out of this thread too imu i dont want you here either


Bulls had 45 chances to win. Nobody can shoot. Fuck only half our guys can hit the rim

Author:  IMU [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

IkeSouth wrote:
Get the fuck out of this thread too imu i dont want you here either


Bulls had 45 chances to win. Nobody can shoot. Fuck only half our guys can hit the rim

And just like everything else, you have no control over that.

https://youtu.be/DksSPZTZES0

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

IMU wrote:
I'm glad you fully agree that the fourth point guard on the team, a guy that was known as a combo guard even during his Purdue days, should play point guard when other point guards are hurt.

This is where we high five!

Image

I'm still wondering who exactly is supposed to sit during this great ascension of Moore? If the Bulls have a full roster then he becomes Nazr's best friend. I don't agree with King on this one. He probably is trying to say he needs to play ahead of Hinrich. I actually don't want to see either of them playing. If they are it's a bad night.

Author:  IMU [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

long time guy wrote:
I'm still wondering who exactly is supposed to sit during this great ascension of Moore?


Brooks goes cold often, and cannot play defense. I've always liked Hinrich, but he isn't nearly the player he once was, which wasn't even 'great' at the pinnacle of his career. When Rose is out, Moore can easily be in a rotation. Snell is still a bad shooter, so with Butler back and healthy, Snell's minutes would get reduced. Moore / Brooks can share a back court together at times.

I'm not saying Moore should be your starting guard. He won't even be in a playoff rotation. But if he is at the end of your bench...you have a good team and a good bench.

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

I did wake up just in time to see your guy Moore shoot an airball. I also heard King state the ball should have gone inside more. I guess his abilities as a floor general leave a lot to be desired.

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I'm still wondering who exactly is supposed to sit during this great ascension of Moore?


Brooks goes cold often, and cannot play defense. I've always liked Hinrich, but he isn't nearly the player he once was, which wasn't even 'great' at the pinnacle of his career. When Rose is out, Moore can easily be in a rotation. Snell is still a bad shooter, so with Butler back and healthy, Snell's minutes would get reduced. Moore / Brooks can share a back court together at times.

I'm not saying Moore should be your starting guard. He won't even be in a playoff rotation. But if he is at the end of your bench...you have a good team and a good bench.
End of the bench is cool with me. I don't think he is better than Snell and I don't think he is much of a point either. He is simply a "guy"

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

IMU wrote:
E'Twaun Moore is making MCW look silly. Stacey King saying MOORE GOTTA GET MORE MINUTES


Bad troll job. I know I'm Stat watching at this stage but Moore was 1 for 5 and the one made field goal was a layup. Yeah he needs to play more.

Author:  sinicalypse [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

IMU wrote:
https://youtu.be/DksSPZTZES0


jesus christ e-moo you have to step up your youtube game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyckHw2z8OU

Author:  IMU [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

sinicalypse wrote:
IMU wrote:
https://youtu.be/DksSPZTZES0


jesus christ e-moo you have to step up your youtube game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyckHw2z8OU

Not when I can rely on you coming off the bench to spell me.

Author:  IMU [ Fri Apr 03, 2015 11:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

E'Twaun Moore playing a serviceable point guard role. Tony Snell with a -15 plus-minus tonight, to go along with his oh-fer.

Author:  long time guy [ Sat Apr 04, 2015 1:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

Nothing like those advanced stats. 2 for 7 is considered serviceable. Etwaun Moore is on his third or fourth team in four yrs. The guy actually had to go to Europe to keep his career going. There is nothing there.

Author:  IMU [ Sat Apr 04, 2015 11:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

long time guy wrote:
Nothing like those advanced stats. 2 for 7 is considered serviceable. Etwaun Moore is on his third or fourth team in four yrs. The guy actually had to go to Europe to keep his career going. There is nothing there.

You idiot - that was the lockout. Many players did that.

Also, being a serviceable point guard is a lot more involved than FGM-FGA.

Author:  long time guy [ Sat Apr 04, 2015 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

Moore has been on 2-3 teams already. The Bulls if I remember right acquired him off waivers. If that doesn't say something about his lack of value I don't know what does. He is the backup for Kirk Hinrich 2015 Hinrich. What does that suggest about his value. No matter how much spin you put on it he is not really good

Author:  long time guy [ Sat Apr 04, 2015 2:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nothing like those advanced stats. 2 for 7 is considered serviceable. Etwaun Moore is on his third or fourth team in four yrs. The guy actually had to go to Europe to keep his career going. There is nothing there.

You idiot - that was the lockout. Many players did that.

Also, being a serviceable point guard is a lot more involved than FGM-FGA.
serviceable is a rather subjective term don't you think?

Author:  Brick [ Wed Oct 28, 2015 8:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

long time guy wrote:
Moore has been on 2-3 teams already. The Bulls if I remember right acquired him off waivers. If that doesn't say something about his lack of value I don't know what does. He is the backup for Kirk Hinrich 2015 Hinrich. What does that suggest about his value. No matter how much spin you put on it he is not really good
Bump!

Author:  bigfan [ Wed Oct 28, 2015 8:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

Opening tip. Who got the ball. D Rose.

He then gave it to Jimmy in the backcourt.

So much for the true PG plan....especially in this offense.

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Moore has been on 2-3 teams already. The Bulls if I remember right acquired him off waivers. If that doesn't say something about his lack of value I don't know what does. He is the backup for Kirk Hinrich 2015 Hinrich. What does that suggest about his value. No matter how much spin you put on it he is not really good
Bump!


I know you are trying to show your Boilermaker love, but mine retired with Everett Stephens and Troy Lewis. You'd be better off trumpeting the greatness of Robbie Hummel right about now. You are hitching your horse to the wrong wagon.

Author:  long time guy [ Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Moore has been on 2-3 teams already. The Bulls if I remember right acquired him off waivers. If that doesn't say something about his lack of value I don't know what does. He is the backup for Kirk Hinrich 2015 Hinrich. What does that suggest about his value. No matter how much spin you put on it he is not really good
Bump!


I know you are trying to display your Boilermaker love, but mine retired with Everett Stephens and Troy Lewis. You'd be better off trumpeting the greatness of Robbie Hummel right about now. You are hitching your horse to the wrong wagon.

Author:  Brick [ Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Moore has been on 2-3 teams already. The Bulls if I remember right acquired him off waivers. If that doesn't say something about his lack of value I don't know what does. He is the backup for Kirk Hinrich 2015 Hinrich. What does that suggest about his value. No matter how much spin you put on it he is not really good
Bump!


I know you are trying to show your Boilermaker love, but mine retired with Everett Stephens and Troy Lewis. You'd be better off trumpeting the greatness of Robbie Hummel right about now. You are hitching your horse to the wrong wagon.
I don't know what you mean here but Moore looks to be developing into a player worth getting some playing time.

Hummel is living it up on a big contract in Europe.

Author:  IMU [ Wed Oct 28, 2015 10:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: long time guy

long time guy wrote:
IMU wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Nothing like those advanced stats. 2 for 7 is considered serviceable. Etwaun Moore is on his third or fourth team in four yrs. The guy actually had to go to Europe to keep his career going. There is nothing there.

You idiot - that was the lockout. Many players did that.

Also, being a serviceable point guard is a lot more involved than FGM-FGA.
serviceable is a rather subjective term don't you think?

Isn't any adjective that can be used to describe how "good" or "bad" a player is subjective?

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/