Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

Seems to be hated by the Lakers. Bulls should look at him. Lakers would probably even take Rose.

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Seems to be hated by the Lakers. Bulls should look at him. Lakers would probably even take Rose.

if the salaries were even close to similar, OK, but they arent..

bigfan wrote:

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Seems to be hated by the Lakers. Bulls should look at him. Lakers would probably even take Rose.

if the salaries were even close to similar, OK, but they arent..

There is always extra crap that gets thrown in to make things work.

Big Chicagoan wrote:

Seems to be hated by the Lakers. Bulls should look at him. Lakers would probably even take Rose.

if the salaries were even close to similar, OK, but they arent..

-2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj).

bigfan wrote:

-2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj).

Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons.

Douchebag wrote:

bigfan wrote:

-2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj).

Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons.

maybe they can sign Yao Ming

Bagels wrote:

Douchebag wrote:

bigfan wrote:

-2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj).

Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons.

maybe they can sign Yao Ming

Or try for LeBron...again.

Lebron is going back to the Heat. His realizes his trading of Love for Wiggins is move he can not fix in Cleveland.

I love that LeBron won't be able to win another title in his career now, at least not without joining GS or SA :lol:

Lebron is going back to the Heat. His realizes his trading of Love for Wiggins is move he can not fix in Cleveland.

bigfan wrote:

-2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj).

Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons.

Douchebag wrote:

bigfan wrote:

-2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj).

Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons.

They are locked into $66 to $74 Mill, depending on Pau for 2017

They have nothing to trade, nobody wants anything they have. Sure, you can get a second rd guy for Taj, or maybe, late in the season take a flyer of a non playing 7 footer and maybe he develops.

But this team is set for 2017, like it or not. So, give Pau some BIG MONEY for 1 year, see if the kids can get along and go for it. The money is spent and its not like we have greatness sitting on the bench that isnt getting time on the floor.

Jimmy Butler got you a low first round pick offer this year and thats it.

The BEST plan for this team is watch D rose and Taj play hard next year looking for free agent deals and trade them for something at the end of the year. Thats the best scenario.

THEN, you can start the rebuild, because you only have Jimmys money on the books and who knows what that Psycho will do, maybe he will want to develop the team, my guess is the "TRADE ME" sign will be out.

So, the "SIGN THE BEST FREE AGENT" Plan will be on display again and the Bulls will sign.....CHANDLER PARSONS!!!

Yeah, its gonna suck for the next 3 years minimum, but make the best out of it. D Rose plays harder for nobody other than D Rose! And next year is his FA showcase.

Taj, who I think is a great guy to have on a team has tried to be the role player to a point, he will be looking for some big money next year, have a feeling you will so see rxtra aggressive stuff from him next year.

KUKOC FOR COACH!

They shouldnt be bad for 5 years though right? That's too long to project.

The Bulls are dead for awhile. End of an era.

rogers park bryan wrote:

They shouldnt be bad for 5 years though right? That's too long to project.

It will be at least 3 seasons. Depending on successes or failures in free ajency or the draft, it could be longer.

leashyourkids wrote:

The Bulls are dead for awhile. End of an era.

At least LTG's infallible eye test has confirmed that Gibson is nothing more than a decent bench player, and that Hoiberg is at his best when he fails to incorporate the Bulls' best player into his offense.

Douchebag wrote:

rogers park bryan wrote:

They shouldnt be bad for 5 years though right? That's too long to project.

It will be at least 3 seasons. Depending on successes or failures in free ajency or the draft, it could be longer.

They'll be bad for as long as Hoiberg is coach. Get the clown out of there and, sigh, try to strike gold with upcoming mega free agents.

Author:	Big Chicagoan [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:19 am ]
Post subject:	D'Angelo Russell
Seems to be hated by the Lakers. Bulls should look at him. Lakers would probably even take Rose.

Author:	bigfan [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:21 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
Big Chicagoan wrote: Seems to be hated by the Lakers. Bulls should look at him. Lakers would probably even take Rose. if the salaries were even close to similar, OK, but they arent..

Author:	Big Chicagoan [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:23 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
bigfan wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Seems to be hated by the Lakers. Bulls should look at him. Lakers would probably even take Rose. if the salaries were even close to similar, OK, but they arent.. There is always extra crap that gets thrown in to make things work.

Author:	spmack [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:26 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
Bulls got enough problems in their lockerroom, they don't need another. Could you imagine D'Angelo Russell taping a secret conversation regarding D.Rose and the LA incident?

Author:	bigfan [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:45 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
Big Chicagoan wrote: bigfan wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Seems to be hated by the Lakers. Bulls should look at him. Lakers would probably even take Rose. if the salaries were even close to similar, OK, but they arent.. There is always extra crap that gets thrown in to make things work. Just need $16 mill more Plus, why would LA even do this when they know he wants to come there and will be a FA after next season. LA isnt winning next year, they have some young players, they will get a top pick this year, so get him for 2018, for nothing. They can think he is some veteran player , that will provide the leadership they need.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

D'Angelo Russell https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=99478	Page 1 of 1

Author:	bigfan [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:56 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
Surprised at the "Media Experts" saying the Bulls need to press the RESET BUTTON. Its just too expensive and almost impossible to RESET. D Rose $21M, you need to find 85% of his money to trade with. Taj? 9 Mill. Dunleavy, McDougie, Jimmy. Need a "3 year plan" -2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj) -2018 Gonna be bad, high draft pick and maybe a few more picks from trading guys in 2017 -2019 FA money, high draft picks, New coach? Its pretty much in stone for 2017. Make the best of it and move on.

Author:	Reared on the Score [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 11:58 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
bigfan wrote: Big Chicagoan wrote: Seems to be hated by the Lakers. Bulls should look at him. Lakers would probably even take Rose. if the salaries were even close to similar, OK, but they arent.. don't need to cap match on trades when a team (like the Lakers) is set to be that far under the cap. They have next to no contracts for next year with Kobe finally shuffling off.

Author:	Douchebag [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 12:00 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
bigfan wrote: -2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj). Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons.

Author:	pittmike [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 12:48 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
I thought like next year the cap in the NBA goes up like a zillion dollars?

Author:	Bagels [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 1:54 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
Douchebag wrote: bigfan wrote: -2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj). Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons. maybe they can sign Yao Ming

Author:	Regular Reader [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 2:41 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
Bagels wrote: Douchebag wrote: bigfan wrote: -2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj). Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons. maybe they can sign Yao Ming Or try for LeBron...again.

Author:	conns7901 [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 2:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
Regular Reader wrote: Bagels wrote: Douchebag wrote: bigfan wrote: -2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj). Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons. maybe they can sign Yao Ming Or try for LeBron...again. Lebron is going back to the Heat. His realizes his trading of Love for Wiggins is move he can not fix in Cleveland.

Author:	Bagels [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 2:55 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
conns7901 wrote: Lebron is going back to the Heat. His realizes his trading of Love for Wiggins is move he can not fix in Cleveland. yet another perk when you get to be player/GM

Author:	FavreFan [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 2:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
I love that LeBron won't be able to win another title in his career now, at least not without joining GS or SA

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	RFDC [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:04 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
FavreFan wrote: I love that LeBron won't be able to win another title in his career now, at least not without joining GS or SA

Author:	Rod [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
conns7901 wrote: Lebron is going back to the Heat. His realizes his trading of Love for Wiggins is move he can not fix in Cleveland. Probably going to the Heat. But I wouldn't be shocked to see him in a Lakers uniform.

Author:	jimmypasta [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:21 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
How about Jackson coming back to coach and signing LeBron & a few other FA's to play for The Knick?

Author:	pittmike [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 5:58 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
Yeah I recall that he loved the Knicks long ago. Whatever I hope the cock sucker wins nothing.

Author:	bigfan [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 6:04 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
Douchebag wrote: bigfan wrote: -2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj). Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons. They are locked into $66 to $74 Mill, depending on Pau for 2017 They have nothing to trade, nobody wants anything they have. Sure, you can get a second rd guy for Taj, or maybe, late in the season take a flyer of a non playing 7 footer and maybe he develops. But this team is set for 2017, like it or not. So, give Pau some BIG MONEY for 1 year, see if the kids can get along and go for it. The money is spent and its not like we have greatness sitting on the bench that isnt getting time on the floor. Jimmy Butler got you a low first round pick offer this year and thats it. The BEST plan for this team is watch D rose and Taj play hard next year looking for free agent deals and trade them for something at the end of the year. Thats the best scenario. THEN, you can start the rebuild, because you only have Jimmys money on the books and who knows what that Psycho will do, maybe he will want to develop the team, my guess is the "TRADE ME" sign will be out. So, the "SIGN THE BEST FREE AGENT" Plan will be on display again and the Bulls will sign.....CHANDLER PARSONS!!! Yeah, its gonna suck for the next 3 years minimum, but make the best out of it. D Rose plays harder for nobody other than D Rose! And next year is his FA showcase. Taj, who I think is a great guy to have on a team has tried to be the role player to a point, he will be looking for some big money next year, have a feeling you will so see rxtra aggressive stuff from him next year. KUKOC FOR COACH!

Author:	conns7901 [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 7:23 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
https://www.change.org/p/los-angeles-la ... phone-away

Author:	FavreFan [ Wed Mar 30, 2016 7:45 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
This is such a ridiculous story with Russell. His reason for leaking this video is that he thought it was a "funny prank" supposedly? What the fuck? That's a really shitty idea of what constitutes a prank.

Author:	Bagels [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:09 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
bigfan wrote: Douchebag wrote: bigfan wrote: -2017 Go for it. Expiring deals, guys wants free agent money (D rose and Taj). Go for it? What are you talking about? This team is going to be bad for at least the next 5 seasons. They are locked into $66 to $74 Mill, depending on Pau for 2017 They have nothing to trade, nobody wants anything they have. Sure, you can get a second rd guy for Taj, or maybe, late in the season take a flyer of a non playing 7 footer and maybe he develops. But this team is set for 2017, like it or not. So, give Pau some BIG MONEY for 1 year, see if the kids can get along and go for it. The money is spent and its not like we have greatness sitting on the bench that isnt getting time on the floor. Jimmy Butler got you a low first round pick offer this year and thats it. The BEST plan for this team is watch D rose and Taj play hard next year looking for free agent deals and trade them for something at the end of the year. Thats the best scenario. THEN, you can start the rebuild, because you only have Jimmys money on the books and who knows what that Psycho will do, maybe he will want to develop the team, my guess is the "TRADE ME" sign will be out. So, the "SIGN THE BEST FREE AGENT" Plan will be on display again and the Bulls will sign.....CHANDLER PARSONS!!! Yeah, its gonna suck for the next 3 years minimum, but make the best out of it. D Rose plays harder for nobody other than D Rose! And next year is his FA showcase. Taj, who I think is a great guy to have on a team has tried to be the role player to a point, he will be looking for some big money next year, have a feeling you will so see rxtra aggressive stuff from him next year. KUKOC FOR COACH! i have no idea what your point is with all that

Author:	Douchebag [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:57 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
See you next year when the Bulls "go for it".

Author:	rogers park bryan [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 9:02 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
They shouldnt be bad for 5 years though right? That's too long to project.

Author:	Douchebag [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 9:04 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
rogers park bryan wrote: They shouldnt be bad for 5 years though right? That's too long to project. It will be at least 3 seasons. Depending on successes or failures in free ajency or the draft, it could be longer.

Author:	leashyourkids [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 10:00 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
The Bulls are dead for awhile. End of an era.

Author:	veganfan21 [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 10:18 am ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
leashyourkids wrote: The Bulls are dead for awhile. End of an era. At least LTG's infallible eye test has confirmed that Gibson is nothing more than a decent bench player, and that Hoiberg is at his best when he fails to incorporate the Bulls' best player into his offense. Douchebag wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: They shouldnt be bad for 5 years though right? That's too long to project. It will be at least 3 seasons. Depending on successes or failures in free ajency or the draft, it could be longer. They'll be bad for as long as Hoiberg is coach. Get the clown out of there and, sigh, try to strike gold with upcoming mega free agents.

Author:	long time guy [ Thu Mar 31, 2016 4:49 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: D'Angelo Russell
veganfan21 wrote: leashyourkids wrote: The Bulls are dead for awhile. End of an era. At least LTG's infallible eye test has confirmed that Gibson is nothing more than a decent bench player, and that Hoiberg is at his best when he fails to incorporate the Bulls' best player into his offense. Douchebag wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: They shouldnt be bad for 5 years though right? That's too long to project. It will be at least 3 seasons. Depending on successes or failures in free ajency or the draft, it could be longer. They'll be bad for as long as Hoiberg is coach. Get the clown out of there and, sigh, try to strike gold with upcoming mega free agents. The eyes never lies! It's is a step up from Mel Profit's classic line "only the toes knows"