It is currently Thu Apr 03, 2025 6:00 pm

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BLACKHAWKS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41185
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
badrogue17 wrote:
Yeah so ummm, the Ducks can fuck off back to Anaheim. Color me unimpressed.


Yeah they didn't look like the greatest team in hockey. I would play them 7 times and take our chances.

_________________
Elections have consequences.
Top
 Profile  
 
Curious Hair
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 10:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57240
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Um, if that team didn't impress you, which ones would? Their #4 center has 35 points in 50 games.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.
Top
 Profile  
 
badrogue17
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 39076
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
Um, if that team didn't impress you, which ones would? Their #4 center has 35 points in 50 games.
What did they do tonight that was impressive besides be shutout for 54 minutes? That's great news for their # 4 center though. Give him a raise. Nothing they showed tonight leads me to believe they aren't imminently beatable in the playoffs.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Last edited by badrogue17 on Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41185
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I didn't say they were not good CH? I said I will take our chances in 7 games.

_________________
Elections have consequences.
Top
 Profile  
 
Curious Hair
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57240
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
badrogue17 wrote:
What did they do tonight that was impressive besides be shutout for 54 minutes?

Great combination of speed, power, and depth. Perry had a few great chances. Hiller was strong. I would say their biggest weakness is that they still take too many penalties, and some of them are downright dumb, like Getzlaf bitching out a ref while his team already down a man. If they play smart, they'll be hard to stop.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.
Top
 Profile  
 
pittmike
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41185
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Curious Hair wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
What did they do tonight that was impressive besides be shutout for 54 minutes?

Great combination of speed, power, and depth. Perry had a few great chances. Hiller was strong. I would say their biggest weakness is that they still take too many penalties, and some of them are downright dumb, like Getzlaf bitching out a ref while his team already down a man. If they play smart, they'll be hard to stop.


If

_________________
Elections have consequences.
Top
 Profile  
 
RFDC
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57851
Woooooahhhhhhh

CH informed us all that Hawks were incapable of beating the Ducks.

Surely this result is wrong.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.
Top
 Profile  
 
Hockey Gay
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Ducks are overrated overachievers, have been for 2 years now, don't worry about them.

Worry about the Blues.
Top
 Profile  
 
Kirkwood
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2014 11:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Sky is falling CH indicates great things. It's when he believes in the Hawks we should worry.
Top
 Profile  
 
Scorehead
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 1:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
The Blackhawks are the best & most talented team in the NHL. The Ducks had a few good weeks. Let me know when they win 2 Stanley Cups in 4 years.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan
Top
 Profile  
 
Kirkwood
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 2:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Scorehead wrote:
The Blackhawks are the best & most talented team in the NHL. The Ducks had a few good weeks. Let me know when they win 2 Stanley Cups in 4 years.

Fucking dammit. We're fucked. Well it was fun while it lasted. Piss.
Top
 Profile  
 
badrogue17
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 39076
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Look Im not the most pollyannic ( is that even a word ? ) about the Blackhawks and there are flaws in their game no doubt but I haven't seen a team this year that they've played that they can't beat . Those teams are the chasers, not the Blackhawks. Even in this recent little " slump" its not like they're getting blown off the ice . They're losing in o.t. and shootouts. Im not going to panic about that. Im pretty sure both the almighty Ducks and powerhouse Blues are going to hit their own little wall before the season ends. Both me and Wanny think they'll be fine.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.
Top
 Profile  
 
Curious Hair
 Post subject: Re: Quack quack 12/17
PostPosted: Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57240
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Ducks just beat the Blues tonight, incidentally. Mirror image of last night's game, went up 3-0, won it 3-2.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BLACKHAWKS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group