http://www.hockey-reference.com/teams/CHI/2017.htmlSort the roster by point shares, a hockey approximation of baseball's win shares. Obviously, Panarin and Crawford are responsible for a great deal of the team's success. Tootoo and Desjardins have subtracted points from the Hawks. (So has Schmaltz, but he's young and already got optioned down.) Relative Corsi For has Desjardins at a damningly low -8.9.
Here's Second City Hockey on how awful Desjardins has been:Quote:
Notice that literally every single one of them does better away from Desjardins. For some of them, like Niklas Hjalmarsson, that benefit is minor. But if you look at guys like Brent Seabrook, Michal Kempny, Nick Schmaltz, and Dennis Rasmussen, it’s a tale of two worlds. When those guys are with Desjardins, the results have been terrible. Otherwise, they’ve been quite good.
And possession-driving is a key part of Desjardins’ game given that he’s a poor finisher, as anyone could tell from his career 0.17 points per game average. He’s always been a fine defensive player who fits best on teams already loaded with offensive talent like the Sharks and the 2014-15 Blackhawks.
But this edition of the Blackhawks doesn’t have nearly as much offensive firepower up and down the lineup, and it makes it harder to justify playing Desjardins. It’s one thing to have Desjardins in the lineup when the bottom six also includes Patrick Sharp, Antoine Vermette, Teuvo Teravainen, and Andrew Shaw. It’s another when those guys are replaced with Dennis Rasmussen, Jordin Tootoo, and a couple rookies.
Tootoo and van Riemsdyk get all the shit for being bad but Desjardins has quietly been the worst player on the team. Sucks, because he was a nice complementary player in 2015, but this is wretched. When Schmaltz, who is tearing it up in Rockford, is ready to come back, it should be at the expense of Desi's roster spot.
_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.