It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 6:54 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
First let me explain what a prediction is for these purposes. EXAMPLE: Hawks will win in 5 games.

You can delve further into how, will every game be a shootout? will Kane? Saad? Sharp? have big series? Etc

If you Bernstein it up and tell me eveything that will happen, but choose not to walk the fine line of a prediction, because thats not right or you dont do that, I will just delete your supports that lead to no conclusion.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 11:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Hawks in 6.

Cant wait to see the cup skate at the UC.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 11:46 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Blackhawks in 5.

Toews will win the consmite even though Keith will have deserved it. Because the voters love Toews more. Toews is playing well. I just think Keith deserves it more to this point. And I don't think it will change after this series.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
Hawks'll win in 5.

I'll say only one game'll go in OT, which they'll lose.

Their one loss will come @ the UC, game 3.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12559
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Hawks in 6.

Meatpants will attempt to steal another marshpeg, but will not be successful.

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Hawks in 6. Things are very fluid at the moment, however. Optics are pretty good at this point.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Hawks Sweep
Kieth gets the MVp even though as much as you guys are heaping the praise on him Kane is showing how valuable he is.

There are at least 3 questionable calls against the Hawks showing once again the NHL hates them.

Game winning goals are by
#1 Toews
#2 Sharp
#3 Seabrook
#4 as usual Kane

No OT in the series.

No shenanigans by fans after the first at home cup victory.
At least 3 F bombs caught after the Victory either in locker room interviews or at the parade, speaking of the parade. Rham moves it to go past Obamas house and inserts the Jackie Roberson kids into it to bring more harmony.

$ arrests made at the parade for disordery although they all involve guns that will be tried to be kept quiet

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57226
Hawks in 7. I think Tampa is better than some are giving them credit for.

I expect a series similar to the Ducks series. Wouldn't surprise me to see Tampa up 3-2 and the Hawks having to dig deep to pull out the last 2 games.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Hawks in 6.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Curious Hair wrote:
Hawks in 6.


Thata Boy!

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 2:18 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65747
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Yeah. I'm thinking Hawks in 6.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Hawks in 5, gonna have 1 game let down...

But have to admit, concerned that EVERYONE giving the Easy win call!

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
bigfan wrote:
Hawks in 5, gonna have 1 game let down...

But have to admit, concerned that EVERYONE giving the Easy win call!


The Bolts are the kind of speedy little team that gives the Hawks fits (Oilers, Avs), but if these guys could get through Anaheim and Nashville, I gotta say they finish it off.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
Hawks in 6. 1 OT game 1.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19366
Hawks in 5. Lose game one and win game two in OT.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:57 am
Posts: 20709
Location: Westmont
pizza_Place: Tony Weed's
1039 Oliver Ave, Aurora
(630) 892-2772
Hawks in 6.

Split Game 1+2. Hawks win 3+4 at home. Lose 5 @ Tampa. Win on home ice in 6.

_________________
CSFMB: Home of the small minded
Beardown wrote:
I'm declaring a victory without research.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:57 am
Posts: 20709
Location: Westmont
pizza_Place: Tony Weed's
1039 Oliver Ave, Aurora
(630) 892-2772
bigfan wrote:
Hawks in 5, gonna have 1 game let down...

But have to admit, concerned that EVERYONE giving the Easy win call!

Well, let's look at Tampa's path to the Cup final. Take Red Wings to a Game 7 in round 1. Montreal decides to play goon hockey in round 2. Rangers supposed "better" D from last year, yet Tampa hung 6 on Lundquist in Game 2 and 3.

Hawks would have mashed those East teams. Tampa would not have had it so easy with the Nashville-Minnesota-Anaheim route.

_________________
CSFMB: Home of the small minded
Beardown wrote:
I'm declaring a victory without research.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Curious Hair wrote:
Hawks in 6.


God only knows the amount of cutting that you're going to have to do to yourself after saying such a thing.

Gonna be a blood bath at the CH house.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 4:29 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
bigfan wrote:
Hawks in 5, gonna have 1 game let down...

But have to admit, concerned that EVERYONE giving the Easy win call!


Nah. Don't be. Hawks got this. This is one of those times where everybody is right.

Hawks are -140 to win the series. Go heavy. I am.

Vegas is gonna get killed. Relatively speaking. The public doesn't bet the NHL like they do the NFL. But they're gonna lose. Gotta believe 90% of the money will be on the Hawks.

The true Stanley Cup final was Hawks vs. Ducks. Do to geography, they have to play another round. This is just recreation time for the Blackhawks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 5:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Here's something interesting: a Stanley Cup bracket prediction made by picking the winner of every regular-season series. Regular season doesn't matter! If you had done that up to this point, the only one you would have gotten wrong was Montreal-Ottawa -- and Chicago-Tampa, of course. Kinda crazy that the NHL ran this big NCAA-ripoff promotion and all you had to do was pick who won head-to-head and figure that the Sens would crap the horseshoe out of their ass.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 5:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38683
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Beardown wrote:
bigfan wrote:
Hawks in 5, gonna have 1 game let down...

But have to admit, concerned that EVERYONE giving the Easy win call!


Nah. Don't be. Hawks got this. This is one of those times where everybody is right.

Hawks are -140 to win the series. Go heavy. I am.

Vegas is gonna get killed. Relatively speaking. The public doesn't bet the NHL like they do the NFL. But they're gonna lose. Gotta believe 90% of the money will be on the Hawks.

The true Stanley Cup final was Hawks vs. Ducks. Do to geography, they have to play another round. This is just recreation time for the Blackhawks.

Nuh-uh. This is going to be a helluva lot closer than people think. Hawks in 7

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
Hawks sweep. Tampa thinks hard about not even showing for game 4

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 6:31 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65747
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
For series wagering, I see only Hawks -160. I just bought a $25 ticket for that.
That's heavy.
Almost not worth wagering, but I put in a bit just for funsies.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 6:36 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Darkside wrote:
For series wagering, I see only Hawks -160. I just bought a $25 ticket for that.
That's heavy.
Almost not worth wagering, but I put in a bit just for funsies.


Really? I got it at -140 earlier today. I go through a private internet book. But he takes the odds based on what others are doing. It's 160 now? That shows you that people are pounding the Hawks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 6:53 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Oh yeah. It's now -155 though mine. Glad I got it in early.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 6:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10102
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
The part of me that uses a brain thinks "Hawks in 6." Our best players are better than their best players. But, the part of me that saw the Hawks absolutely shit the bed in Tampa in February in person thinks "Bolts in 7." The Hawks looked like they were in quicksand the entire game. And of course, my heart thinks "Hawks in 5."

So I'm going average it all out and predict "Hakws in 7." Captain Serious won't let them lose, and there will be a shitload of Blackhawks fans in the stands in Tampa. The night I was there, about 40% of the upper deck was wearing Hawks' gear.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 6:59 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
The part of me that uses a brain thinks "Hawks in 6." Our best players are better than their best players. But, the part of me that saw the Hawks absolutely shit the bed in Tampa in February in person thinks "Bolts in 7." The Hawks looked like they were in quicksand the entire game. And of course, my heart thinks "Hawks in 5."

So I'm going average it all out and predict "Hakws in 7." Captain Serious won't let them lose, and there will be a shitload of Blackhawks fans in the stands in Tampa. The night I was there, about 40% of the upper deck was wearing Hawks' gear.


You're using a February game as a barometer for a Stanly Cup Final? Don't do that. Or if you do, don't gamble.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55933
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
The Bolts game they lost 4-0 was after Kane's injury but just before the Desjardins/Vermette acquisitions. It's hard to call it representative of much. The game the Hawks lost in November was a shootout loss, Bishop went 37/39, probably because the Hawks flung too many perimeter softies at him. That's not representative of much, either, but you still gotta get in on Bishop and get him moving.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Bishop gave up 5 or more goals in 3 of the games against the Rangers. I expect the Hawks to light him up at least a couple of times.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 31, 2015 7:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38683
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
From the Sun Times…

Not only ]is NHL commissioner Gary Bettman not celebrating the continued success of the Blackhawks — despite the obvious impact a championship team in the market the size of Chicago has on the league — he’s almost officially against it.

“Competitive balance is what we think is paramount,” Bettman said last week in Chicago. “The fact that seven teams are in the playoffs who weren’t in the playoffs last year … the fact that if you’re a fan of any team you have hope going into the season that your team can compete. That’s what it’s all about. That’s why having the right system was so important to us.”

By advancing to their fifth conference final in seven years and now their third Stanley Cup final in six years, the Hawks are almost mocking Bettman’s vision of NHL parity.


On the one hand, the salary cap threatens the Hawks’ magnificent run of postseason success — as soon as next season. But for now, with Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane in their prime and signed for the next eight seasons, challengers like the Wild, Predators and even the Ducks have to be wondering just how big the hump is they have to get over.

All three had their best chance in years to beat the Blackhawks, and all three failed for the same, daunting reason — the Blackhawks not only have premier talent with staying power, but also an ability to raise their game to meet any challenge.

Ducks goaltender Frederik Andersen was their latest victim and best illustration of what the Hawks are all about. In the first three games of the Western Conference final, Andersen looked indomitable — better than any goaltender against the Hawks in a playoff series since Mike Smith in 2012. Andersen had a .957 save percentage and a 1.27 goals-against average as the Ducks took a 2-1 series lead. When the Great Dane stymied the Great Kane in Game 1 on a scoring opportunity Patrick Kane usually capitalizes on, it looked like a sign the Hawks had met their match.

But three games later, the Hawks irrepressible will and the uncanniness of Jonathan Toews reduced Andersen to just another overwhelmed goaltender. With Toews’ two goals in the final 1:50 of regulation in Game 5 prying open the door, the Hawks scored 18 goals on Andersen in the final four games — an .844 save percentage and 4.15 goals-against average.


“They were good all over the place,” Ducks forward Andrew Cogliano said after the Hawks’ 5-3 victory in Game 7 on Saturday night. “I thought they made some good adjustments in their zone. They were cutting our cycles off. We were trying to get pucks behind the net and they were doing a good job of getting in the way and breaking out clean.”

That’s what the Hawks do. They take your best shot, react and respond. They lived up to their reputation as a team that picks up steam. After falling behind 2-1 in the series, they won three of the final four games — the only loss in overtime after Toews’ two-goal calling card. So in Games 1-3 of the playoffs under Joel Quenneville, the Hawks are 29-28; in Games 4-7 they are 40-14. Nobody in the NHL is even close to that.





“I think they showed what kind of team they are,” Cogliano said. “Their leaders — Jonny [Toews] had a great game and those guys are the key to their team. They were making plays — making plays all night, really.”

If Bettman’s vision of the NHL in the salary-cap era proves true, what the Hawks are doing could prove to be more special than we know. Even the recent contenders are struggling to keep up. The Bruins, who won the Cup in 2011 and lost to the Hawks in the Final in 2013, did not even make the playoffs this year. The Kings, who won the Cup in 2012 and 2014 and are the only team on the Hawks’ level of mental toughness and resilience, failed to make the playoffs as well. The Penguins have won four playoff series in six years since winning the Cup in 2009.

Mike Babcock bailed on the Red Wings — formerly the NHL’s gold standard but now first-round losers the past two seasons with only three playoff series victories in the past six years. The underachieving Blues had to think about it before re-hiring Ken Hitchcock, an accomplished coach. Not even Barry Trotz could keep Alex Ovechkin and the Capitals from being the Capitals. Playoff losses to the Hawks have Wild and Ducks fans wondering if Mike Yeo and Bruce Boudreau — two more pretty accomplished coaches — are the right guy for the job.

Even the Hawks’ biggest mis-step in the seven-year playoff run — losing Game 7 at home to the Kings in last year’s Western Conference final — might be more impressive than you think. Reaching the conference final after the short-summer of a Cup champion has proven to be difficult. Only the 2009 Red Wings — who reached the Cup Final after winning it all in 2008 — gone further.

When the Kings reached the conference final in 2013 — losing to the Hawks in five games — as defending champions, they had the benefit of a long offseason because of the lockout. Without that benefit after winning the Cup last year, they couldn’t even make the playoffs.

Though Quenneville disagrees, it seemed clear that the Hawks were running on fumes last year. They lost a lead 18 times in the postseason, including nine times in the conference final against the Kings. This year, a fresher team has lost the lead only seven times.

In four of the five games they’ve lost a lead, they’ve rallied to win. They never trailed in a sweep of the Wild, winning 1-0 in Game 3 on the road. When the Hawks lost 2-0 leads against the Kings last year, they lost both games. When they led 2-0 in Game 7 against the Ducks, they scored the next two goals and coasted to victory.

“Down a game a couple times in the series and we fought back,” Kane said after Game 7. “It speaks volumes about the character in this room and the leadership starting with the captain [Toews] — you get two goals right away.

“It’s pretty remarkable how he shows up in these games and seems to come through time after time. We have great leadership from Tazer to Sharpie [Patrick Sharp] to Duncs [Duncan Keith]. Duncs was unbelievable this series. And we kind of follow their lead and try to do the best we can.

In tougher circumstances, the Blackhawks are doing what the Ditka Bears could not — they are maxing out with a group of players that is special on several levels. And from Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane on down, they seem to know it and appreciate it. There’s still one step to go this season. There are no guarantees in Gary Bettman’s hockey world. But the way the Hawks are going, you’ve got to like their chances.

Ads by Adblade

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Last edited by badrogue17 on Sun May 31, 2015 7:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group