It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 1:32 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:48 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
bigfan wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
bigfan wrote:
Is he really better right now?

Is it because the preds went high on every shot and Darling might be better at blocking those just due to his size?

In game 1, I know Darling blocked everything, but he seemed to not gain control on many?

Need that guy from the COMMITTED INDIAN to answer my hockey questions!


Yes, he is better. Today marks the changing of the guard for the Blackhawks. Cro will have trade value and hopefully he'll play somewhere else next year and the Hawks can get a couple of good young players in return.


Uhmmm? Still good on this?


I think Crawford is good, but Darling is good too. AND DARLING IS CHEAPER. That's why you trade Crawford cuz the Hawks need cap space money. Toews and Kaners new money starts next year.

How long is darling under control before he is a free agent. Is it like baseball? How does this hockey shit work?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Being good is one thing...being able go wire to wire in a momentum changing semi final playoff game, thats the stones you pay for.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55929
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
bigfan wrote:
Being good is one thing...being able go wire to wire in a momentum changing semi final playoff game, thats the stones you pay for.

Agreed, but they still might have to trade him this summer. At least his value will be sky-high if he keeps this up.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:52 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Curious Hair, do the Hawks control Darling a few years before they have to pay him? I know he's older, but he's still a rookie, right?

Do they have arbitration and shit like that before free agency like in MLB.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Curious Hair wrote:
bigfan wrote:
Being good is one thing...being able go wire to wire in a momentum changing semi final playoff game, thats the stones you pay for.

Agreed, but they still might have to trade him this summer. At least his value will be sky-high if he keeps this up.

Having to trade him doesnt make Darling better, just more cap friendly...I understand , they think their defense is what makes a goalie better...and maybe they are right....but its one thing to come into a game down 3-0, but to shut out a team in a game 3 like that is damn big.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Scorehead wrote:
bigfan wrote:
Is he really better right now?

Is it because the preds went high on every shot and Darling might be better at blocking those just due to his size?

In game 1, I know Darling blocked everything, but he seemed to not gain control on many?

Need that guy from the COMMITTED INDIAN to answer my hockey questions!


Yes, he is better. Today marks the changing of the guard for the Blackhawks. Cro will have trade value and hopefully he'll play somewhere else next year and the Hawks can get a couple of good young players in return.


Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55929
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Beardown wrote:
Curious Hair, do the Hawks control Darling a few years before they have to pay him? I know he's older, but he's still a rookie, right?

Do they have arbitration and shit like that before free agency like in MLB.

He'll hit unrestricted free agency after his new contract expires because he'll be over 27. Cost control lasts through seven years of service or age 27, whichever comes first.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 9:59 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Curious Hair wrote:
Beardown wrote:
Curious Hair, do the Hawks control Darling a few years before they have to pay him? I know he's older, but he's still a rookie, right?

Do they have arbitration and shit like that before free agency like in MLB.

He'll hit unrestricted free agency after his new contract expires because he'll be over 27. Cost control lasts through seven years of service or age 27, whichever comes first.


When does his contract expire?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55929
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Summer of 2017. He was on a one-year deal this season and signed a two-year extension during the season. $587,500 cap hit for those two years. $6MM for Crawford.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:16 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Curious Hair wrote:
Summer of 2017. He was on a one-year deal this season and signed a two-year extension during the season. $587,500 cap hit for those two years. $6MM for Crawford.


Ok. Cool. Gotta trade Crawford to get that difference in money.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:21 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
I'm sure the Hawks would try to trade him to the East. Even take a little less over a Western Conference team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:38 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
The Hawks strategy should be to draft the best available goalie with their first rounder in this draft. Then dump Darling in 2 years when they have to pay him. Plug in the kid.

They didn't pay Antti Niemi after the first Cup. I thought that was Bownen's strategy. Find a goalie. Whomever. Never pay them big money when they are due. But he paid Crawford.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33809
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
I thought they were dumb to let nieme go at the time. And I don't get why they then paid Crawford a few years later.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55929
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Beardown wrote:
The Hawks strategy should be to draft the best available goalie with their first rounder in this draft. Then dump Darling in 2 years when they have to pay him. Plug in the kid.


First of all, they don't have a natural first-round or second-round pick. They traded the first for Vermette and the second for Timonen. (They have a compensatory 2nd from not signing Kevin Hayes.) Second, drafting goalies in the first round is very stupid. You pick them up in later rounds or sign them undrafted.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55929
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Spaulding wrote:
I thought they were dumb to let nieme go at the time. And I don't get why they then paid Crawford a few years later.

Niemi went to arbitration and San Jose broke the gentlemen's agreement and offer-sheeted Hjalmarsson so that we had to choose between one of the two. We chose right. They chose wrong.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:48 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
Curious Hair wrote:
Beardown wrote:
The Hawks strategy should be to draft the best available goalie with their first rounder in this draft. Then dump Darling in 2 years when they have to pay him. Plug in the kid.


First of all, they don't have a natural first-round or second-round pick. They traded the first for Vermette and the second for Timonen. (They have a compensatory 2nd from not signing Kevin Hayes.) Second, drafting goalies in the first round is very stupid. You pick them up in later rounds or sign them undrafted.


I guess you told me.

:oops:

You wait. One day I'll know hockey!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 11:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33809
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Curious Hair wrote:
Niemi went to arbitration and San Jose broke the gentlemen's agreement and offer-sheeted Hjalmarsson so that we had to choose between one of the two. We chose right. They chose wrong.


Yeah vaguely remember that. Didn't Niemi want 3M or something at the time? I love me some Hjalmar.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Darling?
PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55929
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Beardown wrote:
You wait. One day I'll know hockey!!!!

It's okay. The New York Islanders made the same mistake and they're an actual team, I think.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group