Faulk is back for the Canes. The Hawks couldn't beat them without their best player, not sure I wanna see how they do against them with him.
Hawks have played 41/82 and logged 53 points. The pace would be 106, obviously, but with the Hawks' third-quarter blues (and fourth, for that matter) it'll probably be closer to an even 100. Oddly enough, they went the whole first half without a single game against Minnesota, who has three or four games in hand and is technically ahead of the Hawks in terms of points above .500.
How would you grade everyone to this point?
A: Crawford, Panarin, Anisimov, Hossa -- they've done everything asked of them and more. Without these guys we're sixth in the division. Hossa's renaissance has probably been my favorite part of this season.
B: Kane, Keith, Darling, Hjalmarsson, Hartman -- Kane's production was never going to match last year but he still feels like he should be doing a little more. Keith has lost a step and I hope he's merely pacing himself, but he's still one of the best defensemen in the league. Darling stepped in terrifically during Crawford's injury but let's not allow ourselves to forget a few stinkers he's had along the way. Hammer remains an extremely valuable defenseman. Hartman has been a pleasant surprise though his point production is still lower than it ought to be at a 30-point pace. We need more from him but I feel good about getting it.
C: van Riemsdyk, Seabrook, Campbell, Panik, Kruger, Rasmussen, Hinostroza -- Seabs has been pretty bad on the defensive side as of late, point production notwithstanding, with the end result being incommensurate with his cap hit. TVR is neither as good as supporters want him to be nor as bad as Fels and McClure want him to be. At this point he's ideally a #7 whose mistakes and lack of speed can be mitigated simply by keeping his exposure down; it's to be hoped Kempny's emergence starts doing just that. Campbell seems to be miscast with anyone but Hjalmarsson. Kruger does what he does on defense but his offensive black hole is getting harder and harder to tolerate with our lack of secondary scoring. Rasmussen's not bad for a 13th. Hinostroza has some tools but I'm still not sold.
D: Toews -- "D" is below average and that's what Toews is. He's 12th in point shares at 1.7, less than Hartman, barely more than Panik and van Riemsdyk. He's been a pot-addled piece of shit all year and it's hard to see it ever getting better. He's become uncreative on offense, tentative on defense, and overall a huge disappointment as anything but a team mascot. Maybe his linemates haven't been ideal but that's something he and his agent should have discussed before making him the highest-paid hockey player on Earth and a burden to the people whose job it is to furnish said linemates. He's now on pace for 43 points, OOOOOOOOOOH, he'll need way more than 24 in the next 41 to keep the Hawks in first because those goals sure as shit aren't coming from our bottom six. F: Desjardins, Tootoo -- zero points scored between them with negative point shares. Their existence does make the team worse. One or both needs to be gone. Inc.: Forsling, Schmaltz, Motte, Kero -- they're either in or have been in Rockford, Forsling just went down today
_________________ Molly Lambert wrote: The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.
|