Banning users won't solve anything. I am not in agreement with posting garbage for the sole purpose of stirring up shit and arguments, but banning users will just turn into one big snowball effect.

Hold on, I am still laughing at this A hole!!!!!!!!!!

I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?

So let me get this right: You contacted a website to complain that "the wrong picture of a dick" was shown?

Wow, you truly are an idiot, and I think I've probably lost a few brain cells along the way for going back and forth with you for the past few minutes.

Except CGS keeps the insanity contained to the board.

She isn't weirding people out at parties, freaking peoples wives out and stalking other posters through the U.S. mail system. That shit is wack, crosses the line and to defend it is dumb.

We are just playing into his hand, but yeah, I wouldn't mind him gone.

lot of nuggets hidden in these old threads

I predict, if left unchecked, that this eventually leads to a "board split" where a secondary board is created by someone else and 33% of the people leave both boards, some post on both, but most people go to one or the other. This happens in a lot of online communities when the experience gets too annoying. The reason it hasn't happened here is that the sheer numbers of people on the board are not enough to make it easy as it is in a community of thousands.

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

Nailed it.

missing the 33% and if one person leaves and posts as 23 different people in one place having conversations with himself, is it really a board or is it a piece of evidence in his eventual manslaughter trial?

Yeah, I missed this one the first time around. This is Penske File material to kick off the day.

That was a math error. I meant .33%.

Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)

I'm against banning anyone. I know I've rubbed people the wrong way (I know what thread that will be in) many times. I don't think it's good to start banning people because we don't like them or they're annoying. Something tells me he would continue posting anyway.

Great post my friend.

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

MOST PEOPLE HERE DON'T FUCKING LIKE YOU and THIS BOARD WOULD BE SO MUCH BETTER OF A PLACE WITHOUT YOU AROUND.

That's not group think you dumb son of a bitch.

I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?

This is the best Chicago Sports Fan Message Board there is.

If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.

missing the 33% and if one person leaves and posts as 23 different people in one place having conversations with himself, is it really a board or is it a piece of evidence in his eventual manslaughter trial?

I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.

Well good luck with that. Everyone knows that the only way to get banned is to personally piss off BigFan and Panthro isn't running any contests so that's not going to happen.

rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

RPB is right. You suck.

Damn.

Chris really has a hard-on for hating Panther.

Julie Newmar without a doubt

lot of nuggets hidden in these old threads

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that he has pictures of a shirtless Brad Pitt tacked up on the walls of his mancave.