| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| New Sports Book - Similar to "Freakonomics" https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=54677 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Ugueth Will Shiv You [ Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | New Sports Book - Similar to "Freakonomics" |
I received this press release the other day from Crown Archtype Publishing on an upcoming book they want me to review. I think it sounds fantastic: EQUAL PARTS FREAKONOMICS, MONEYBALL, AND “MYTHBUSTERS”, THIS BOOK WILL FOREVER CHANGE OUR PERSPECTIVE ON SPORTS SCORECASTING THE HIDDEN INFLUENCES BEHIND HOW SPORTS ARE PLAYED AND GAMES ARE WON For as often as sports are held up as a metaphor for life, the reverse is also true. Life explains sports. The same human behavior and psychology that underscore our daily lives also applies to athletes, coaches and owners. Tiger Woods misses putts for the same reason your broker may have missed the Google IPO. Refs miss calls for the same reason some parents don't inoculate their kids. Coaches punt on fourth down for the same reason patrons blindly order the Blue Plate Special at the corner diner. “SCORECASTING: The Hidden Influences Behind How Sports Are Played and Games Are Won”, by Tobias J. Moskowitz and L. Jon Wertheim (Crown Archetype, On-Sale January 25, 2011) digs into the behavioral dynamics and then delivers readers from the sports clichés and misstatements that have dominated for decades. Leave your anecdotal evidence at the door. Emotion means little here. With a combination of first-rate analysis and first-rate storytelling, Moskowitz (a University of Chicago Booth School of Business finance professor) and Wertheim (a writer at Sports Illustrated), assess the most deeply-rooted “truisms” that haunt the games we love. Does defense truly win championships? Is there really such a thing as momentum in sports? Does icing the kicker work? Are the Chicago Cubs cursed? Can you really quantify the subjective aspects of sports, like officiating? Moskowitz and Wertheim challenge all those sports clichés that we accept as articles of faith. Test the unconventional strategies. Reveal the hidden influences. Mine the relevant data. Moskowitz and Wertheim go beyond the numbers to explore the biases and brain functions that affect nearly every pitch, pass and penalty. SCORECASTING introduces readers to omnipresent game-changers like “hindsight bias”, “loss aversion”, “omission bias”, “ref bias” and our deepest desires to conform to the group. SCORECASTING confirms what has long been assumed. Consider: * Officials are biased…but not for the reasons you think. * The key to long-term focus and creative play: job security. * Luck doesn’t make us smarter or dumber, only lucky or unlucky. * There’s no I in team, but there is one in elite player. You better have one or more if you want a title. * Using all four downs in football is still considered sports heresy. Wrongly, but everyone punts, right? * Tiger Woods is, in fact, mortal—and for reasons having nothing to do with Thanksgiving of 2009. It also breaks new ground that is as controversial as it is statistical accurate, like: * Why the home field advantage really exists. * Why the first pick in the entire NFL draft is worth less than the first pick in the second round. * Why umpire-monitoring technology is wrecking home field advantage in baseball. * Why players and coaches are plagued by the compulsion to avoid losses at the expense of acquiring gains. * Why cold weather teams are no more likely to win at home when the weather is brutally cold, nor are warm. weather teams more likely to win at home when the temperature is awfully hot. * Why the strike zone on 3-0 pitches is 188 square inches larger than it is on 0-2 counts. * Why the Cubs are actually less unlucky than the average team in baseball. * Why momentum doesn’t exist in sports. If we question the conventional wisdoms in sports and master the empirical data, we will have predictability where there was none before. The authors prove time and time again, that teams ignore data and human behavior at their own peril. SCORECASTING will quite simply change the way we look at sports. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New Sports Book - Similar to "Freakonomics" |
SCORECASTING....is that how that chick got on the overnight shift on the Score? |
|
| Author: | Ugueth Will Shiv You [ Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New Sports Book - Similar to "Freakonomics" |
Received my copy in the mail the other day. Fairly interesting read to this point. Most of what has been presented is common sense, but having actual data on many items is noteworthy. For example, everyone knows that, on a 3-0 count, an MLB umpire's strike zone increases. According to a study done for the book, this "increase" is rather substantial; approximately 29% larger. Likewise, the strike zone will decrease by a considerable amount on an 0-2 count. |
|
| Author: | Ed_from_Lisle [ Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New Sports Book - Similar to "Freakonomics" |
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote: Likewise, the strike zone will decrease by a considerable amount on an 0-2 count. Except when Soriano is at the dish. |
|
| Author: | Ugueth Will Shiv You [ Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New Sports Book - Similar to "Freakonomics" |
Another interesting tidbit: NBA referee's are more likely to call a foul on a player with a low number of fouls as opposed to "favoriting a star player". In order words, if Kobe Bryant and Chris Duhon were diving for a loose ball and a foul is called, the player with less fouls has a substantially higher (more than 60%) chance at being called for the foul; it has nothing to do with "star bias". The overall basis of the book seems to be that officials do as much as they possibly can to not impact the outcome of a play/game if they can help it. Calling a sixth foul on a basketball player or calling a third-strike on a "star" hitter goes against this understanding. Therefore, officials are less likely to make the call in these situations. |
|
| Author: | Ed_from_Lisle [ Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New Sports Book - Similar to "Freakonomics" |
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote: Another interesting tidbit: NBA referee's are more likely to call a foul on a player with a low number of fouls as opposed to "favoriting a star player". In order words, if Kobe Bryant and Chris Duhon were diving for a loose ball and a foul is called, the player with less fouls has a substantially higher (more than 60%) chance at being called for the foul; it has nothing to do with "star bias". The overall basis of the book seems to be that officials do as much as they possibly can to not impact the outcome of a play/game if they can help it. Calling a sixth foul on a basketball player or calling a third-strike on a "star" hitter goes against this understanding. Therefore, officials are less likely to make the call in these situations. Except when Soriano is at the dish. |
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Wed Jan 26, 2011 6:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: New Sports Book - Similar to "Freakonomics" |
Anything in there about winning the coin flip and kicking off to the Packers? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|