Here's what I don't like about these kinds of reports on these studies...
Quote:
The study of 455 Californian men found those who had smoked pot were twice as likely to have been diagnosed with testicular germ cell tumors, the most common form of testicular cancer in men younger than 35.
So I'm thinking they do about 50% that smoke pot, and 50% that don't? So about 230 on either side.
Quote:
The National Cancer Institute estimates more than 8,500 men will be diagnosed with testicular cancer in 2012. About 360 of them will die from it.
So this is saying across the board - including older than 35 years old - they see about 8.5k that are diagnosed per year. So over 20 years, you are seeing 170,000 cases (in the US?) Out of 170 million males (approx) for a total of 0.001% chance? And they've been able to determine that they are twice as likely to get it which means you have at least three guys with cancer out of the 455?
Well, apparently, they don't do the study that way -- they pull people that already have testicular cancer (163 of them) and pull people that don't have testicular cancer (292) and then see what they smoked. And then this expert goes on to say it could be due to other lifestyle habits that those that smoke pot tend to do as opposed to those who don't, and that there really isn't sufficient analysis on the whole thing in general. But he thinks it is important to note... and the expert is the one who administered the first study (and is looking for credit for establishing this connection - a connection which he admits is not conclusive.)