It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 5:54 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23562
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Correcting you on your shear lack of knowledge of the legislative process isn't substance? And for those scoring at home, I'm pretty sure you have dropped a few more "F" bombs than myself.


Stop equivocating. Was the bill that wasn't called crafted by Trump's White House or by Congressional Republicans or maybe by Zeke Emanuel?


The inevitable response to this will be Caller Bob's third or fourth "BUT OBAMA..." in this thread recently. Pretty funny how quickly people run to that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
It was Donald Trump's bill. Should I write that in crayon for you?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Caller Bob wrote:
It was Donald Trump's bill. Should I write that in crayon for you?



If you do, please remember that "government" has a two "n"s in it.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Correcting you on your shear lack of knowledge of the legislative process isn't substance? And for those scoring at home, I'm pretty sure you have dropped a few more "F" bombs than myself.


Stop equivocating. Was the bill that wasn't called crafted by Trump's White House or by Congressional Republicans or maybe by Zeke Emanuel?


The inevitable response to this will be Caller Bob's third or fourth "BUT OBAMA..." in this thread recently. Pretty funny how quickly people run to that.


"But every other POTUS got a honeymoon!....," that's ok? Pick a lane...pick a lane...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23562
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Correcting you on your shear lack of knowledge of the legislative process isn't substance? And for those scoring at home, I'm pretty sure you have dropped a few more "F" bombs than myself.


Stop equivocating. Was the bill that wasn't called crafted by Trump's White House or by Congressional Republicans or maybe by Zeke Emanuel?


The inevitable response to this will be Caller Bob's third or fourth "BUT OBAMA..." in this thread recently. Pretty funny how quickly people run to that.


"But every other POTUS got a honeymoon!....," that's ok? Pick a lane...pick a lane...


Except you're the one saying Trump doesn't deserve a "honeymoon", while insisting that the healthcare bill be placed squarely on Trump just like ACA was Obama. It is you who is deviating from lane to lane when it suits you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Correcting you on your shear lack of knowledge of the legislative process isn't substance? And for those scoring at home, I'm pretty sure you have dropped a few more "F" bombs than myself.


Stop equivocating. Was the bill that wasn't called crafted by Trump's White House or by Congressional Republicans or maybe by Zeke Emanuel?


The inevitable response to this will be Caller Bob's third or fourth "BUT OBAMA..." in this thread recently. Pretty funny how quickly people run to that.


"But every other POTUS got a honeymoon!....," that's ok? Pick a lane...pick a lane...


Except you're the one saying Trump doesn't deserve a "honeymoon", while insisting that the healthcare bill be placed squarely on Trump just like ACA was Obama. It is you who is deviating from lane to lane when it suits you.


Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but can you explain how that is inconsistent?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23562
pizza_Place: Giordano's
leashyourkids wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Correcting you on your shear lack of knowledge of the legislative process isn't substance? And for those scoring at home, I'm pretty sure you have dropped a few more "F" bombs than myself.


Stop equivocating. Was the bill that wasn't called crafted by Trump's White House or by Congressional Republicans or maybe by Zeke Emanuel?


The inevitable response to this will be Caller Bob's third or fourth "BUT OBAMA..." in this thread recently. Pretty funny how quickly people run to that.


"But every other POTUS got a honeymoon!....," that's ok? Pick a lane...pick a lane...


Except you're the one saying Trump doesn't deserve a "honeymoon", while insisting that the healthcare bill be placed squarely on Trump just like ACA was Obama. It is you who is deviating from lane to lane when it suits you.


Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but can you explain how that is inconsistent?


Trump doesn't get a honeymoon, despite previous Presidents getting one (ignoring historical precedent), whereas the bill attempting to repeal and replace the ACA is "Trump's bill", just like the ACA was "Obama's bill [later: Obamacare]" (observing historical precedent). Either Trump should get a honeymoon, or the latest attempt at a legislative healthcare initiative isn't on him or "his".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Correcting you on your shear lack of knowledge of the legislative process isn't substance? And for those scoring at home, I'm pretty sure you have dropped a few more "F" bombs than myself.


Stop equivocating. Was the bill that wasn't called crafted by Trump's White House or by Congressional Republicans or maybe by Zeke Emanuel?


The inevitable response to this will be Caller Bob's third or fourth "BUT OBAMA..." in this thread recently. Pretty funny how quickly people run to that.


"But every other POTUS got a honeymoon!....," that's ok? Pick a lane...pick a lane...


Except you're the one saying Trump doesn't deserve a "honeymoon", while insisting that the healthcare bill be placed squarely on Trump just like ACA was Obama. It is you who is deviating from lane to lane when it suits you.


I did not say that. My "tongue in cheek" comment of "I guess BO doesn't own Obamacare"... I thought indicated that. Trump owns this bill, just like BO owned Obamacare.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23562
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Correcting you on your shear lack of knowledge of the legislative process isn't substance? And for those scoring at home, I'm pretty sure you have dropped a few more "F" bombs than myself.


Stop equivocating. Was the bill that wasn't called crafted by Trump's White House or by Congressional Republicans or maybe by Zeke Emanuel?


The inevitable response to this will be Caller Bob's third or fourth "BUT OBAMA..." in this thread recently. Pretty funny how quickly people run to that.


"But every other POTUS got a honeymoon!....," that's ok? Pick a lane...pick a lane...


Except you're the one saying Trump doesn't deserve a "honeymoon", while insisting that the healthcare bill be placed squarely on Trump just like ACA was Obama. It is you who is deviating from lane to lane when it suits you.


I did not say that. My "tongue in cheek" comment of "I guess BO doesn't own Obamacare"... I thought indicated that. Trump owns this bill, just like BO owned Obamacare.


That's what I said...your inconsistency here is not affording Trump a honeymoon in accordance with historical [Presidential] precedent, while observing the ritual of placing major legislative initiatives at the feet of the President calling for them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Obama endorsed the name "Obamacare" publicly. MANY agree that was a mistake by him. Both Obamacare and the GOP alternative are trash anyways I dont see why people get so freaked out by it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
leashyourkids wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but can you explain how that is inconsistent?


Trump doesn't get a honeymoon, despite previous Presidents getting one (ignoring historical precedent), whereas the bill attempting to repeal and replace the ACA is "Trump's bill", just like the ACA was "Obama's bill [later: Obamacare]" (observing historical precedent). Either Trump should get a honeymoon, or the latest attempt at a legislative healthcare initiative isn't on him or "his".


Well, what if it was a success?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
That's what I said...your inconsistency here is not affording Trump a honeymoon in accordance with historical [Presidential] precedent, while observing the ritual of placing major legislative initiatives at the feet of the President calling for them.


If ACA had been rushed through in BO"s first 100 days, you can bet he would have got roasted in this "honeymoon" period.

Now, someone with a favorable opinion of BO would say that he carefully took his time with the bill so it would be successful in the house and senate, I fall in this category.... Critics of BO and other(POTUS')will say they purposely didn't take a hard line on anything in their 1st 100 days to avoid such criticism.(Don't agree, but I understand this argument, it's checking down for a 10 yard pass on 3 and 15)

In Trump's case, the hastley made healthcare bill(I think that's a pretty nonpartisan take to call it that) doesn't make him exempt in any "honeymoon" period. It was purposely rushed because of his asinine campaign promises.

I don't see this as a double standard at all.


Last edited by Caller Bob on Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23562
pizza_Place: Giordano's
leashyourkids wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but can you explain how that is inconsistent?


Trump doesn't get a honeymoon, despite previous Presidents getting one (ignoring historical precedent), whereas the bill attempting to repeal and replace the ACA is "Trump's bill", just like the ACA was "Obama's bill [later: Obamacare]" (observing historical precedent). Either Trump should get a honeymoon, or the latest attempt at a legislative healthcare initiative isn't on him or "his".


Well, what if it was a success?


That sounds like something you should ask CB, I'm commenting on the inconsistency of his logic.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18498
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
[ Stop equivocating. Was the bill that wasn't called crafted by Trump's White House or by Congressional Republicans or maybe by Zeke Emanuel?[/quote]

The inevitable response to this will be Caller Bob's third or fourth "BUT OBAMA..." in this thread recently. Pretty funny how quickly people run to that.[/quote]

"But every other POTUS got a honeymoon!....," that's ok? Pick a lane...pick a lane...[/quote]

Except you're the one saying Trump doesn't deserve a "honeymoon", while insisting that the healthcare bill be placed squarely on Trump just like ACA was Obama. It is you who is deviating from lane to lane when it suits you.[/quote]

I did not say that. My "tongue in cheek" comment of "I guess BO doesn't own Obamacare"... I thought indicated that. Trump owns this bill, just like BO owned Obamacare.[/quote]

That's what I said...your inconsistency here is not affording Trump a honeymoon in accordance with historical [Presidential] precedent, while observing the ritual of placing major legislative initiatives at the feet of the President calling for them.[/quote]
There is no other President that had promised the American people so much to be done in so little time....Build the Wall...Defeat Isis.....Immigration ban...Repeal and Replace Obama Care....Pipeline being made of American Steel....and hasn't done a mother fuckin one of them. Honeymoon denied.....if this us his way of makin 'Merica great again we are fucked

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but can you explain how that is inconsistent?


Trump doesn't get a honeymoon, despite previous Presidents getting one (ignoring historical precedent), whereas the bill attempting to repeal and replace the ACA is "Trump's bill", just like the ACA was "Obama's bill [later: Obamacare]" (observing historical precedent). Either Trump should get a honeymoon, or the latest attempt at a legislative healthcare initiative isn't on him or "his".


Well, what if it was a success?


That sounds like something you should ask CB, I'm commenting on the inconsistency of his logic.


If the bill passed the house and senate, (which shouldn't have been hard considering the guy sold to us in November as the ultimate deal-maker, couldn't make a deal with a Republican Congress), then, you have to give him a "political win" and see how the bill plays out when enacted in law.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
The clearly biased CNN wrote:
"Some members wanted to talk about the policy aspect of the bill, and that wasn't something he wanted to talk about," said a Freedom Caucus member who was in the room. "He wanted to talk about the big picture."
"I got the sense that he had delegated a lot of the specifics to White House personnel and/or Paul Ryan and/or house leadership, and he was going to support whatever they came up with regardless of good or bad, as long as it was some kind of repeal and replacement," said the caucus member, who asked not to be quoted by name in order to talk freely about the private meeting.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23562
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Except every part of that--save for, maybe, "inflammatory rhetoric"--can describe candidacies of MANY who ultimately got an extended period of time during which the media treated them with kid gloves, a honeymoon, if you will.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Killer V wrote:
The clearly biased CNN wrote:
"Some members wanted to talk about the policy aspect of the bill, and that wasn't something he wanted to talk about," said a Freedom Caucus member who was in the room. "He wanted to talk about the big picture."
"I got the sense that he had delegated a lot of the specifics to White House personnel and/or Paul Ryan and/or house leadership, and he was going to support whatever they came up with regardless of good or bad, as long as it was some kind of repeal and replacement," said the caucus member, who asked not to be quoted by name in order to talk freely about the private meeting.


One would think the "ultimate deal maker" would have got involved at that point? No? I don't care how rough the seas are, bring the ship home


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Inflammatory rhetoric is relative.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Except every part of that--save for, maybe, "inflammatory rhetoric"--can describe candidacies of MANY who ultimately got an extended period of time during which the media treated them with kid gloves, a honeymoon, if you will.


I'd like to know which ones struck out on a major bill, so early, with their own party controlling the house. I know ,I know, it's coming..."But the freedom caucus!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Except every part of that--save for, maybe, "inflammatory rhetoric"--can describe candidacies of MANY who ultimately got an extended period of time during which the media treated them with kid gloves, a honeymoon, if you will.


Well, like JORR likes to fall back on, no other president has ever "sounded" like Trump. JORR reads that as "common man speak," but I refer to the constant, blatant, instantly proven lying to the American people. He coined "fake News" and "alternative facts." He declared the media was an enemy. Cause and effect.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Killer V wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Except every part of that--save for, maybe, "inflammatory rhetoric"--can describe candidacies of MANY who ultimately got an extended period of time during which the media treated them with kid gloves, a honeymoon, if you will.


Well, like JORR likes to fall back on, no other president has ever "sounded" like Trump. JORR reads that as "common man speak," but I refer to the constant, blatant, instantly proven lying to the American people. He coined "fake News" and "alternative facts." He declared the media was an enemy. Cause and effect.


I thought he was done after the "John-McCain /Captured" comments, but he survived that.
Common man speak = dumb/white trash/uneducated


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23562
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Except every part of that--save for, maybe, "inflammatory rhetoric"--can describe candidacies of MANY who ultimately got an extended period of time during which the media treated them with kid gloves, a honeymoon, if you will.


I'd like to know which ones struck out on a major bill, so early, with their own party controlling the house. I know ,I know, it's coming..."But the freedom caucus!"


Are we still talking about a honeymoon period, or not? This seems like you've added a third lane, in the opposite direction.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Except every part of that--save for, maybe, "inflammatory rhetoric"--can describe candidacies of MANY who ultimately got an extended period of time during which the media treated them with kid gloves, a honeymoon, if you will.


I'd like to know which ones struck out on a major bill, so early, with their own party controlling the house. I know ,I know, it's coming..."But the freedom caucus!"


Are we still talking about a honeymoon period, or not? This seems like you've added a third lane, in the opposite direction.


Can you cite a POTUS, that had a major bill fail(not even up for vote) in his first 100 days when his own party controlled the house? I cannot name one off the top of my head. Hence why this is:

A) Unprecedented
B) Immune from a "honeymoon period"
C) Fair game


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Killer V wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Except every part of that--save for, maybe, "inflammatory rhetoric"--can describe candidacies of MANY who ultimately got an extended period of time during which the media treated them with kid gloves, a honeymoon, if you will.


Well, like JORR likes to fall back on, no other president has ever "sounded" like Trump. JORR reads that as "common man speak," but I refer to the constant, blatant, instantly proven lying to the American people. He coined "fake News" and "alternative facts." He declared the media was an enemy. Cause and effect.


Trump's major lies aren't much different than those of other presidents, e.g. "Read my lips..." or "If you like your doctor..." But he also lies about picayune nonsense like his inauguration or his tiny hands.

Also, he didn't coin the term "fake news". That was Hillary who used it as another excuse as to why she lost. Trump has merely co-opted it.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:20 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Caller Bob wrote:
Killer V wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Except every part of that--save for, maybe, "inflammatory rhetoric"--can describe candidacies of MANY who ultimately got an extended period of time during which the media treated them with kid gloves, a honeymoon, if you will.


Well, like JORR likes to fall back on, no other president has ever "sounded" like Trump. JORR reads that as "common man speak," but I refer to the constant, blatant, instantly proven lying to the American people. He coined "fake News" and "alternative facts." He declared the media was an enemy. Cause and effect.


I thought he was done after the "John-McCain /Captured" comments, but he survived that.
Common man speak = dumb/white trash/uneducated


What is "white trash"?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Why should anyone give a shit about the mainstream media unless they are reporting outright falsehoods. If you want favorable headlines then stop picking fights and lying your ass off as if you were still some celebrity dipshit running a shitty reality show.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Killer V wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Any historical precedent of a honeymoon period was forfeited when he ran a campaign based on immediate action(defined timelines) with irrational promises and inflammatory rhetoric.


Except every part of that--save for, maybe, "inflammatory rhetoric"--can describe candidacies of MANY who ultimately got an extended period of time during which the media treated them with kid gloves, a honeymoon, if you will.


Well, like JORR likes to fall back on, no other president has ever "sounded" like Trump. JORR reads that as "common man speak," but I refer to the constant, blatant, instantly proven lying to the American people. He coined "fake News" and "alternative facts." He declared the media was an enemy. Cause and effect.


I thought he was done after the "John-McCain /Captured" comments, but he survived that.
Common man speak = dumb/white trash/uneducated


What is "white trash"?

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fake News
PostPosted: Mon Mar 27, 2017 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Killer V wrote:

Well, like JORR likes to fall back on, no other president has ever "sounded" like Trump. JORR reads that as "common man speak," but I refer to the constant, blatant, instantly proven lying to the American people. He coined "fake News" and "alternative facts." He declared the media was an enemy. Cause and effect.


This.

Every other President in my lifetime has been granted a honeymoon period because they knew what they didn't know and didn't come out of the gate swinging wildly at everyone from the press to the Intelligence community to tv game how hosts.

There is no doubt that Trump has been treated differently. Because he acts different.

It may not be fair, but you reap what you sow in some cases.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 156 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group