It is currently Mon Mar 31, 2025 6:12 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 33526
pizza_Place: What??
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Rob Manfred is hell bent on keeping the Rays in Florida for a similar reason that Gary Bettman was hell bent on keeping the Coyotes in Phoenix: TV market. Stories are starting to leak that although Manfred cannot force a sale, he can and will make life very difficult on Stu and coerce him to sell. There are two interested owners groups, one with Joe Molloy (who was a longtime Yankee minority owner who was the control person when George Steinbrenner was suspended) and one with Barry Larkin that wants to build in Orlando. And Manfred probably has a sufficient number of owners to block a relocation, as they want to save Nashville for the massive expansion entry fee.

The owner's statement might as well said, "I'm selling." He lost all goodwill with St. Pete. And MLB will withhold revenue sharing if he doesn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 8:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 6:24 pm
Posts: 373
pizza_Place: State Line
Nashville sort of ironically is becoming what Tampa-St. Pete was 30-35 years ago. The threat of relocating there probably already got the Brewers upgrades to AmFam Field, and will probably wind up getting the Rays and Sox new stadium deals to stay put. But ultimately they're not going to be able to resist the expansion cash grab, and "more jobs" can be a bargaining chip in the labor war that's coming.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10983
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Nardi wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
Rob Manfred is hell bent on keeping the Rays in Florida for a similar reason that Gary Bettman was hell bent on keeping the Coyotes in Phoenix: TV market. Stories are starting to leak that although Manfred cannot force a sale, he can and will make life very difficult on Stu and coerce him to sell. There are two interested owners groups, one with Joe Molloy (who was a longtime Yankee minority owner who was the control person when George Steinbrenner was suspended) and one with Barry Larkin that wants to build in Orlando. And Manfred probably has a sufficient number of owners to block a relocation, as they want to save Nashville for the massive expansion entry fee.

The owner's statement might as well said, "I'm selling." He lost all goodwill with St. Pete. And MLB will withhold revenue sharing if he doesn't.

What I've learned in the 5 months I've lived in FL is that downtown St. Pete kicks ass. The stadium is not far from a vibin' downtown scene. If the Rays are staying in the area, it's the correct location. Much to my surprise, the team appears to be well supported in terms of merch....not easy, given the volume of transplants here.

The stadium deal that was in place had milestone deliverables required along the way. It appears Stu didn't have the cashflow to meet was due now and dragged his feet announcing he can hold up the Rays end of the deal. Curious is correct, though, he's hired competent baseball people to operate well with little money. I like the comparison to the "East Coast A's". I wish the Marlins were a decent team, as that might provide an indication as to what attendance would like in a new stadium with a quality product on the field. Maimi sure appears to be very White Sox in a nature that no one is showing up with a garbage team.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57200
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
From what I can tell, the Marlins never really recovered from the one-two punch of that weird Ozzie Guillen season and their books leaking, which showed that while they were begging for a new stadium, they were pocketing revenue sharing. They totally botched the landing in downtown Miami and destroyed the entire notion of the New Stadium Bump.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 33526
pizza_Place: What??
Curious Hair wrote:
From what I can tell, the Marlins never really recovered from the one-two punch of that weird Ozzie Guillen season and their books leaking, which showed that while they were begging for a new stadium, they were pocketing revenue sharing. They totally botched the landing in downtown Miami and destroyed the entire notion of the New Stadium Bump.

Bingo. It's filtered everywhere. I think even Las Vegas might collapse. This A's guy is just a big of a pain in the ass as the Tampa guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57200
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
BigW72 wrote:
What I've learned in the 5 months I've lived in FL is that downtown St. Pete kicks ass. The stadium is not far from a vibin' downtown scene. If the Rays are staying in the area, it's the correct location.

You live there and I don't, but the line on why the Rays have had such poor attendance even in the good times has always been that St. Petersburg is too inconvenient to drive to for most people on the Tampa side of the water. Maybe that's true, maybe it's not, but the gate numbers against the surprisingly solid TV ratings would certainly bear that out. I don't think it's the right spot. I think it might have to be Orlando, where the Rays were farming out home games for a few years in the late 2000s.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 6:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25032
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Sounds like another fun weather event down south tomorrow that will fuck up insurance companies some more.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 7:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57200
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
KDdidit wrote:
Sounds like another fun weather event down south tomorrow that will fuck up insurance companies some more.

They have reinsurance.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2025 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:25 am
Posts: 1148
Location: Houston, Texas
pizza_Place: Sam’s - Oglesby, IL
Curious Hair wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
What I've learned in the 5 months I've lived in FL is that downtown St. Pete kicks ass. The stadium is not far from a vibin' downtown scene. If the Rays are staying in the area, it's the correct location.

You live there and I don't, but the line on why the Rays have had such poor attendance even in the good times has always been that St. Petersburg is too inconvenient to drive to for most people on the Tampa side of the water. Maybe that's true, maybe it's not, but the gate numbers against the surprisingly solid TV ratings would certainly bear that out. I don't think it's the right spot. I think it might have to be Orlando, where the Rays were farming out home games for a few years in the late 2000s.


It is inconvenient to get there. A friend who used to live in Orlando (now lives in St. Pete) hated the drive so he rarely went to games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2025 9:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30999
KDdidit wrote:
Sounds like another fun weather event down south tomorrow that will fuck up insurance companies some more.

Should they move?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Sun Mar 16, 2025 11:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25032
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Insurance companies?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2025 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10983
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
The Division wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
What I've learned in the 5 months I've lived in FL is that downtown St. Pete kicks ass. The stadium is not far from a vibin' downtown scene. If the Rays are staying in the area, it's the correct location.

You live there and I don't, but the line on why the Rays have had such poor attendance even in the good times has always been that St. Petersburg is too inconvenient to drive to for most people on the Tampa side of the water. Maybe that's true, maybe it's not, but the gate numbers against the surprisingly solid TV ratings would certainly bear that out. I don't think it's the right spot. I think it might have to be Orlando, where the Rays were farming out home games for a few years in the late 2000s.


It is inconvenient to get there. A friend who used to live in Orlando (now lives in St. Pete) hated the drive so he rarely went to games.

It is inconvenient from the North and from Inland, but from the south where I live, it's a great location. Buccaneers and Lightning play in downtown Tampa and that probably serves as a better overall location. But for me....it's worse.

I was just at the downtown Tampa Riverwalk area over the weekend and it's a nice spot. Not sure if the Rays had any land opportunity there I do suppose that would serve them better than St. Pete.

I don't know enough about Orlando other than it being a big convention area and then Disney.....I hate Orlando. No idea if they could support the Rays any better than Tampa / St. Pete. I think Tampa / St. Pete is a better option, but that's just my opinion.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2025 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57200
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
BigW72 wrote:
I was just at the downtown Tampa Riverwalk area over the weekend and it's a nice spot. Not sure if the Rays had any land opportunity there I do suppose that would serve them better than St. Pete.


The plan was for them to build on some industrial blight between the Channel District and Ybor City. 4th/Channelside, I think. Then, it just didn't happen for some reason, probably Sternberg not having the money.

If they can get that back on track, that would probably be the best option. The Bolts have no trouble drawing.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2025 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:25 am
Posts: 1148
Location: Houston, Texas
pizza_Place: Sam’s - Oglesby, IL
BigW72 wrote:
The Division wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
What I've learned in the 5 months I've lived in FL is that downtown St. Pete kicks ass. The stadium is not far from a vibin' downtown scene. If the Rays are staying in the area, it's the correct location.

You live there and I don't, but the line on why the Rays have had such poor attendance even in the good times has always been that St. Petersburg is too inconvenient to drive to for most people on the Tampa side of the water. Maybe that's true, maybe it's not, but the gate numbers against the surprisingly solid TV ratings would certainly bear that out. I don't think it's the right spot. I think it might have to be Orlando, where the Rays were farming out home games for a few years in the late 2000s.


It is inconvenient to get there. A friend who used to live in Orlando (now lives in St. Pete) hated the drive so he rarely went to games.

It is inconvenient from the North and from Inland, but from the south where I live, it's a great location. Buccaneers and Lightning play in downtown Tampa and that probably serves as a better overall location. But for me....it's worse.

I was just at the downtown Tampa Riverwalk area over the weekend and it's a nice spot. Not sure if the Rays had any land opportunity there I do suppose that would serve them better than St. Pete.

I don't know enough about Orlando other than it being a big convention area and then Disney.....I hate Orlando. No idea if they could support the Rays any better than Tampa / St. Pete. I think Tampa / St. Pete is a better option, but that's just my opinion.



I agree with this take. And I agree that St. Pete is an awesome city. Actually heading that way this weekend for a friend's 60th birthday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2025 12:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57200
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Orlando is a soulless expanse with almost St. Louis-level humidity. I don't particularly care for it. But it'd probably be better than building a brand-new publicly funded stadium in St. Pete.

Some of that Spanish-influenced architecture around Tampa is pretty neat. I'd love to see a park incorporate some of that.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33480
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
I enjoyed the Cubs in Tampa (St Pete) last year. The stadium sucked, but we were walking distance from it and found lots of fun places to hang out.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10983
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
I will definitely go to a Rays game this year with them playing at George Steinbrenner field....rarely get a chance to see MLB at such a small stadium.

Near the Channel district is a total win....in the end it would have come down to St. Pete offering more public money. That's dead. I am pretty sure they're going to strong-arm Stu to sell the team. He is Michael McCaskey level egg on his face for screwing up stadium deals.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25032
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
I went to a Rays game in 2010 and the stadium power went out in a thunderstorm before first pitch and it started late. Welp, there's my Rays story.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 9:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 39038
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
KDdidit wrote:
I went to a Rays game in 2010 and the stadium power went out in a thunderstorm before first pitch and it started late. Welp, there's my Rays story.


How was it?

Watching a game on TV there was like watching a game years ago in the old Kingdome, just awful.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 10:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25032
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
As a one time stadium visit it was okay. Easy to get to, close parking, reasonably priced, and good views. If I was a Rays fan I'd be disappointed with it though. It's got that dome thing where even with all the lights it never seems bright enough. It reminded me of when I was in college and our team was playing in the Metrodome. We got there before the game and University of Minnesota was finishing their game. As a college kid it looked amazing, like it did on TV with the hefty bags in the outfield and you could visualize Jack Morris going up against Smoltz in game 7 of the WS. Their game ended and they literally turned off half the lights for our crappy NAIA team's game and it was far less magical. Tropicana Field felt like a game with 1/2 the lights off.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Wed Mar 19, 2025 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57200
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
BigW72 wrote:
I am pretty sure they're going to strong-arm Stu to sell the team. He is Michael McCaskey level egg on his face for screwing up stadium deals.


Like the McCaskeys, he just doesn't have the money, but unlike the NFL, doesn't have mammoth national revenue streams.

He bought the team in, what, 2007, I think? Maybe late 2006? I'm going to look it up now: okay, $200MM for a 48% stake in May '04. I didn't realize it was that long before the rebrand. Good that I did all that stream-of-consciousness so you didn't think I knew it without googling. The point is that he's a relic of when Some Guys could get together and buy a low-end professional sports team at what is now considered a modest sum. (The owner of the Lightning straight-up got away with robbery.) The Rays' value has almost sextupled since then, but I doubt the rest of his portfolio has, which even I know must present some problems when he needs money to build a stadium. He's B.C.: Before Clippers.

Basically, you need to be an oligarch to own a team these days. Or just inherit ione. Not that I'm saying "pity the mere multi-millionaire" here, but it's clear that Some Guys can't keep up anymore.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 6:24 pm
Posts: 373
pizza_Place: State Line
Seacrest wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
I went to a Rays game in 2010 and the stadium power went out in a thunderstorm before first pitch and it started late. Welp, there's my Rays story.


How was it?

Watching a game on TV there was like watching a game years ago in the old Kingdome, just awful.


Also reminds me of the dome in St. Louis that became the most depressing and dull place in the world to watch a game from as soon as Warner, Faulk and Bruce were gone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Milton
PostPosted: Thu Mar 20, 2025 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57200
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Curious Hair wrote:
The point is that he's a relic of when Some Guys could get together and buy a low-end professional sports team at what is now considered a modest sum. (The owner of the Lightning straight-up got away with robbery.)


To wit: the Celtics, who are a tenant of the Bruins, just sold for $6.1 billion.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group