chaspoppcap wrote:
When you get hurt on the job at the City of Chicago you have to take drug tests. I had to for 2 years until my case was settled. Common tactic to trip you up,just like I.G. following you around taking pictures making sure you are not doing shit you are not supposed too.
That doesn't sound right. I could see you having to take one right after your accident, especially if you were driving the truck. I don't see how it would be legal to continue testing you, after you pissed clean. AFAIK, and somebody can correct me if I am wrong, assistance comes from the state, not the city. Illinois does not drug test welfare/disability applicants, that I do know for sure. Maybe one of the board lawyers can clear this up.
This isn't at all like an insurance company having a private investigator follow somebody around with a camera, hoping to catch them doing something. That's another bad analogy.
Your "disability, baby" (I'll bet you wish you could un-ring that bell) story has been vague, and has changed MANY times over the years. Of course, that is your right to not share, but it does open things up for speculation. I have seen posters suggest that you were drunk and crashed the truck, and another say that you were drunk and you fell of the truck. The cat is already out of the bag. Why not set the record straight, and end the speculation?
chaspoppcap wrote:
Ill let this drop because as usual when you are cornered into a position you are unwilling to answer it is to deflect to someone else.
You're going to let this drop? You have me cornered? I'm deflecting?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2347e/2347ebc0b7577f6bf259c9d833e0475bb719a9c1" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Yeah, no.
Nobody on this board cries about being picked on, more than you do. I know that you went to bigfan several times to complain about me. However, none of that stops you from firing away at people. You recently announced to the board that you were new and improved, and even sent me a PM complaining that "I haven't given you credit for your fine work", whatever that means. Out of nowhere, you called me a "fucking hypocrite" because I didn't call out LTG for saying something something, HURR DURR. Then you accused Peeps of "fucking posting and running" after he posted something that completely destroyed your previous post. In another completely unprovoked gesture, you made sure to correct a poster's spelling of McNown to McClown. Then today, you accuse me of "being judgmental as usual" just because my argument made sense, and yours didn't. I'm still waiting for you to explain how I was judgmental in any of my posts today. Forgive me for not believing that these are just jokes. It's hard to give the benefit of the doubt to a guy who has a long history of rage posting.
Chas, a few years back, you asked me if we could have a peace treaty. I immediately accepted. Since then, I have not made fun of you in any way. I have kept up my end of the deal, despite your MANY potshots. In this discussion, I didn't make fun of you, I didn't judge you, nor did I point out your spelling and grammar errors. Baby McNown hasn't been making fun of you, either. And for as many bombs as you throw at LTG, I would say that he goes pretty easy on you. You can't have it both ways. Either you are going to run with the dogs, or you stay on the porch.
chaspoppcap wrote:
Um I agree with you on almost every point ,except that repeat attendees should be forced to go to longer and stricter programs. Why is that a bad thing?
I am not saying jail,that was a wrong thing to say.
That's not at all what you said. Not even close. You said rehab shouldn't be permanent, which can only be taken to mean that after a few missteps, they go to jail. Then you said that I wanted to "throw money at the problem", yet now you seem to be in agreement with me that some people might need long rehab stints. You had several posts to clear that up.