Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

When the Founders wrote the Constitution, do you think they ever envisioned a media who would normalize trying to find reasons to impeach the president every minute of every day?

I think I’ve heard the 1st half of that thought in other arguments recently...hmm. What was it

Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.

When the Founders wrote the Constitution, do you think they ever envisioned a media who would normalize trying to find reasons to impeach the president every minute of every day?

It's been all over everybody's FB and twitter feed who isn't in hiding realizing that Dear Leader may be finally cooked.

When the Founders wrote the Constitution, do you think they ever envisioned a media who would normalize trying to find reasons to impeach the president every minute of every day?

You would ... well, everyone would ... do well to not cite something as believable and/or newsworthy because "it's been all over everybody's Facebook and Twitter feed(s)".

I think I’ve heard the 1st half of that thought in other arguments recently...hmm. What was it

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

Turn on any cable network, except for one, at any time of day, and they're frothing at the mouth over shit that has absolutely no bearing on what is going on.

https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2018/04/10/crime-fraud-exception-raises-questions-for-cohen-raid/?slreturn=20180311192550
Law.com ok for ya Juicy? I won't tell teacher I did your homework for ya.

Do you actually engage folks irl like some unjustifiably smug faux know-it-all 11th grader that's compensating for his parents not loving him enough and thus also his own self-loathing? Because that's the only reason I can think of that you can't have a conversation with people that take umbrage with even the most incidental points you offer.

Do you actually engage folks irl like some unjustifiably smug faux know-it-all 11th grader that's compensating for his parents not loving him enough and thus also his own self-loathing? Because that's the only reason I can think of that you can't have a conversation with people that take umbrage with even the most incidental points you offer.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

I'm starting to think some sort of hostage is behind the account, and the only way they can escape is to post on the internet in a manner that is likely to get the police to track down the I.P. address.

The one person I still see on rare occasion who acts like the right wing brigade does on here? Absofuckinglutely.

I also think that if you are choosing Juicy's impartiality, or for that matter that Leash didn't chime in with agreement just to be a smarmy asshole since I was involved, as a hill to die on you are making a poor decision.

Mine is sort of tongue-in-cheek.

I still loathe Trump, but what is this? Turn on any cable network, except for one, at any time of day, and they're frothing at the mouth over shit that has absolutely no bearing on what is going on. He is a vapid egomaniac, but that is not a valid reason for this shit. And the actual bad part is that some state Congress somewhere probably just passed legislation to allow putting rat poison in the water, but no one even hears about it.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

Rick felt dirty for agreeing with me so he took a shot at Bernie.

It reminds me of a simpler time when you, JORR, Curious Hair, and Tall Midget were all politically aligned.

I'm a big dumb shitlib baby

That is kind of weird, isn't it?

Maybe President Trump is forcing us all to challenge our assumptions and become better people.

It would be interesting if Bernie were President if we'd be looking into how he begged poor people to donate $10 instead of eat for a day and then bought a third house on a lake right after he declared he wasn't a Democrat any more.

That’s a pretty strange take...even for you.

WATCH: Alabama Football Players Pray For Donald Trump And His Staff At The White House




con video...
http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/11/alaba ... ite-house/

"muh leader is a great man"

The most famous lawyer in North America, who is above all reproach, Allan Deshowitz says The Duck got jobbed by Herr Mueller. (Read his book, “Trumped Up: How Criminalization of Political Differences Endangers Democracy.”)


(I thought McNitwit said he was faking it here. Seems dubious, eh? He really is crazy. Let's pray for him)

War Fucking Eagle!!

Does sound better than "Roll Tide".

I have to admit enjoying this incarnation more than his past efforts.

I have to admit enjoying this incarnation more than his past efforts.

When the Founders wrote the Constitution, do you think they ever envisioned a media who would normalize trying to find reasons to impeach the president every minute of every day?

The newspaper wars of the 1790s, in which Callender enlisted, were ferocious. “The golden age of America’s founding was also the gutter age of American reporting,” writes historian Eric Burns. Papers were partisan, not impartial. Editors attacked each other in the street, cursing each other with prolixity and backward-running sentences. They seemed to have the typesetting equivalent of unlimited minutes when it came to using insulting synonyms found in the thesaurus. Their enemies were “depraved,” “worthless,” “vile,” “intemperate,” and “wicked.” Accusations of drunkenness were frequent (and accurate) as were charges of corruption and debauchery.

Thomas Jefferson testified to the ugliness of the trade when he described what he looked for in a good editor. He lamented that such a person would have to:

This sounds just as high-minded as we’d expect from the author of the Declaration of Independence, but it’s blarney. Jefferson was fine with slander, feeding the public need for low entertainment and fact- free denunciations just as long as they were aimed at his rivals. He had no problem supporting or arranging to support newspapers that did just that.

Like today, in the age of our founders one person’s depravity and slander was another person’s fact. What Jefferson would have roared about, his rival Alexander Hamilton would have applauded as plain truth. Each side in the debates of the early republic thought they were the hero in the morality play of the infant republic.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_ ... homas.html