It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:50 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
You really don't get the difference? There's a reason why air travel is so highly regulated. I don't want discussing bombs banned in my local tavern, but you damn sure better not have that conversation the next time you're reclining in your pajamas on a 727.
This post avoids the point that you are shifting responsibility to others(don't dress a certain way and don't recline) but in the other you are doing what you need to do in order to avoid it.


When you buy a ticket for the seat next to me and come on the flight dressed like a fucking savage, I can't avoid it. That's the point.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think Rick is suggesting that it follows logically then that if there is such demand for non-reclining flights, they should be popping up. Obviously there is a demand. But the amount of flights are limited. There are different factors than there are with bars/restaurants.
No. The point is about how you are shifting responsibility. You are willing to avoid smokers, going so far as to making it much easier for them to smoke next to you by lifting the ban on smoking, but you aren't willing to avoid the issue of reclining seats in any way whatsoever.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
When you buy a ticket for the seat next to me and come on the flight dressed like a fucking savage, I can't avoid it. That's the point.
I understand that it isn't a perfect example to your irrational stance on shorts, but it runs against your thoughts on reclining of seats.

However, in regards to your thoughts on the dress code, I will view myself as the smoker in this situation. My comfort in being able to wear shorts is more important than your comfort in being able to not be next to me in shorts. Isn't that basically your rationale for being against the smoking ban?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think Rick is suggesting that it follows logically then that if there is such demand for non-reclining flights, they should be popping up. Obviously there is a demand. But the amount of flights are limited. There are different factors than there are with bars/restaurants.
No. The point is about how you are shifting responsibility. You are willing to avoid smokers, going so far as to making it much easier for them to smoke next to you by lifting the ban on smoking, but you aren't willing to avoid the issue of reclining seats in any way whatsoever.


I have a choice to avoid smokers. I have no choice in avoiding you reclining in your sweatpants and flip flops.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:32 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
This thread has really increased my enthusiasm for euthanasia.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
When you buy a ticket for the seat next to me and come on the flight dressed like a fucking savage, I can't avoid it. That's the point.
I understand that it isn't a perfect example to your irrational stance on shorts, but it runs against your thoughts on reclining of seats.

However, in regards to your thoughts on the dress code, I will view myself as the smoker in this situation. My comfort in being able to wear shorts is more important than your comfort in being able to not be next to me in shorts. Isn't that basically your rationale for being against the smoking ban?


This is all about your comfort. The fact that you feel you should be allowed to dress like you're in your bedroom has led you to the next conclusion, that you should be allowed to put your head in my lap. It's all part and parcel of the same "Hooray for me! The hell with you!" culture. Like Favre Fan said, if you don't like it, FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I have no choice in avoiding you reclining in your sweatpants and flip flops.
False. Not only are there seats where the person in front of you can't recline on basically every airplane, but they now have economy comfort seats that render the whole issue completely meaningless as there is easily enough legroom for the person in front of you to recline and for you to be just as comfortable.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is all about your comfort. The fact that you feel you should be allowed to dress like you're in your bedroom has led you to the next conclusion, that you should be allowed to put your head in my lap. It's all part and parcel of the same "Hooray for me! The hell with you!" culture. Like Favre Fan said, if you don't like it, FUCK YOU!!!!!!!!!!
So why are you against the smoking ban in restaurants? It sounds like a pretty good countermeasure to the "Hooray for me! The hell with you!" culture.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:43 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Image

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:44 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Image

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Not exactly. I think if a man wants to open an establishment that allows smoking, that should be his business. I won't be one of his customers. That's a free market issue if ever there was one.


As usual I am in lockstep with JORR on this one.

Dont get me started on seatbelts...

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30331
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Not exactly. I think if a man wants to open an establishment that allows smoking, that should be his business. I won't be one of his customers. That's a free market issue if ever there was one.


As usual I am in lockstep with JORR on this one.

Dont get me started on seatbelts...

So I am assuming you don't think they should be required, what about for children?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Hawg Ass wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Not exactly. I think if a man wants to open an establishment that allows smoking, that should be his business. I won't be one of his customers. That's a free market issue if ever there was one.


As usual I am in lockstep with JORR on this one.

Dont get me started on seatbelts...

So I am assuming you don't think they should be required, what about for children?


I certainly think that carseats for young children are a good idea. I wear my seatbelt and I make my kids wear theirs. I dont think it's something that police should be enforcing though.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30331
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Not exactly. I think if a man wants to open an establishment that allows smoking, that should be his business. I won't be one of his customers. That's a free market issue if ever there was one.


As usual I am in lockstep with JORR on this one.

Dont get me started on seatbelts...

So I am assuming you don't think they should be required, what about for children?


I certainly think that carseats for young children are a good idea. I wear my seatbelt and I make my kids wear theirs. I dont think it's something that police should be enforcing though.

I don't think they should be able to pull you over for it, if they pull you over for another violation and you are not buckled then give me the $10 ticket. I and my son wear our seatbelts also.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43583
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Not exactly. I think if a man wants to open an establishment that allows smoking, that should be his business. I won't be one of his customers. That's a free market issue if ever there was one.


As usual I am in lockstep with JORR on this one.

Dont get me started on seatbelts...

So I am assuming you don't think they should be required, what about for children?


I certainly think that carseats for young children are a good idea. I wear my seatbelt and I make my kids wear theirs. I dont think it's something that police should be enforcing though.

For adults, they should be able to do what they want. But I agree with handing out tickets if parents don't buckle their children in. Kids are not capable of making the "no seatbelt" decision on their own.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Douchebag wrote:
For adults, they should be able to do what they want. But I agree with handing out tickets if parents don't buckle their children in. Kids are not capable of making the "no seatbelt" decision on their own.


Fair enough. I would support that.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Hawg Ass wrote:
I don't think they should be able to pull you over for it, if they pull you over for another violation and you are not buckled then give me the $10 ticket. I and my son wear our seatbelts also.


that's the way it used to be (not sure about the 10, ive never gotten one but always assumed it was a 50$ ticket)
now they can pull you over for just that

when i was watching Cops one time an officer flat out said they pull people over for minor things with the intention of searching for drugs/DUIs/etc (and in that scene he pulled someone over for a missing license plate light- that has to be the best one)

i mean its obviously the case, was just surprised to hear a cop flat out admit it on something that was going to be televised


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
I don't want to live in a country where I face a very minor fine for not doing something that is proven to give me a much better shot at surviving one of the leading causes of death in the country and the only downside is having to take the time to click a button when I want to get out. This country makes me sick.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't want to live in a country where I face a very minor fine for not doing something that is proven to give me a much better shot at surviving one of the leading causes of death in the country and the only downside is having to take the time to click a button when I want to get out. This country makes me sick.


It isnt that simple but I wouldnt expect you to think of anything but the pure black and white of any situation. Keep on Bricking.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Douchebag wrote:
For adults, they should be able to do what they want. But I agree with handing out tickets if parents don't buckle their children in. Kids are not capable of making the "no seatbelt" decision on their own.


Pretty much the kind of thinking that should apply nearly across the board, with the added caveat of so long as you don't infringe on or endanger someone else, doowutchyalike. How we got away from that as a nation is depressing.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't want to live in a country where I face a very minor fine for not doing something that is proven to give me a much better shot at surviving one of the leading causes of death in the country and the only downside is having to take the time to click a button when I want to get out. This country makes me sick.


It isnt that simple but I wouldnt expect you to think of anything but the pure black and white of any situation. Keep on Bricking.
This seems to be a common theme now. "It's not black and white" is a pretty bad answer.

Tell me what the downside is to wearing a seatbelt.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't want to live in a country where I face a very minor fine for not doing something that is proven to give me a much better shot at surviving one of the leading causes of death in the country and the only downside is having to take the time to click a button when I want to get out. This country makes me sick.


It isnt that simple but I wouldnt expect you to think of anything but the pure black and white of any situation. Keep on Bricking.
This seems to be a common theme now. "It's not black and white" is a pretty bad answer.

Tell me what the downside is to wearing a seatbelt.


I dont think there is a downside. I wear mine every day. I dont think the government needs to be involved beyond the limits of making car companies install them in vehicles. You do things that are unsafe for you everyday. If they dont affect others around you then why should you be stopped and harrassed about it. It's the babysitting aspect of our society. We are adults, give us the info and let us make the choice.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I used to agree with DB and Hanks sentiment


The problem is when you hear a story of a car going out of control because the guy was thrown from the car (if wearing seatbelt would have stayed in seat and could have avoided further damage)


This is especially important for big trucks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I dont think there is a downside. I wear mine every day. I dont think the government needs to be involved beyond the limits of making car companies install them in vehicles. You do things that are unsafe for you everyday. If they dont affect others around you then why should you be stopped and harrassed about it. It's the babysitting aspect of our society. We are adults, give us the info and let us make the choice.
A car is a special case though. Cars are now designed with the assumption that passengers will be wearing them. The danger to other cars from not wearing one may be small but it isn't zero either.

I'll use crosswalks as another example. Crosswalks, by all accounts, are a good thing to have that makes it safer. However, it restricts the "choice" of someone to run across 6 lanes of traffic. It is because there can be unintended consequences to this choice and the downside isn't worth giving up on the upside. Now, people do have the option of disobeying it, but they risk a relatively minor fine. It's not like we are putting seat belt violators in jail. They get a $25 ticket in Illinois.

The laws are also written in a way that puts liability in an accident on other drivers in the event of their negligence. Now, if we added in something that said that other drivers are never liable for any injury caused to a person who isn't wearing a seatbelt we may be getting closer to the point where the "decision" doesn't effect others.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
rogers park bryan wrote:
I used to agree with DB and Hanks sentiment


The problem is when you hear a story of a car going out of control because the guy was thrown from the car (if wearing seatbelt would have stayed in seat and could have avoided further damage)


This is especially important for big trucks


What? Someone gets thrown from a moving vehicle while it is still traveling at a high enough rate of speed with which to cause considerable damage? I'd like to read some of those stories.

Seems to me like it takes a major collision to cause you to be thrown from your vehicle and the momentum of your car is significantly slowed...A collision that would be extreme enough that even if you were strapped in you probably arent doing much defensive driving afterwards anyway.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30331
For those that don't wear them, how in the hell can you listen to that dinging that goes on until you put the belt on?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hank Scorpio wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I used to agree with DB and Hanks sentiment


The problem is when you hear a story of a car going out of control because the guy was thrown from the car (if wearing seatbelt would have stayed in seat and could have avoided further damage)


This is especially important for big trucks


What? Someone gets thrown from a moving vehicle while it is still traveling at a high enough rate of speed with which to cause considerable damage? I'd like to read some of those stories.

Seems to me like it takes a major collision to cause you to be thrown from your vehicle and the momentum of your car is significantly slowed...A collision that would be extreme enough that even if you were strapped in you probably arent doing much defensive driving afterwards anyway.

You should look into it. Ever see a truck out of control on a highway?

You dont have to be thrown outside the car. Poor wording on my part.

But if youre jolted out of driving position you might cause others more damage that you could have avoided if you were in your seat belt and could steer off

If you're saying there arent that many crashes that are hard enough to jolt someone out of a seat then Ill just say I disagree


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I dont think there is a downside. I wear mine every day. I dont think the government needs to be involved beyond the limits of making car companies install them in vehicles. You do things that are unsafe for you everyday. If they dont affect others around you then why should you be stopped and harrassed about it. It's the babysitting aspect of our society. We are adults, give us the info and let us make the choice.
A car is a special case though. Cars are now designed with the assumption that passengers will be wearing them. The danger to other cars from not wearing one may be small but it isn't zero either.

I'll use crosswalks as another example. Crosswalks, by all accounts, are a good thing to have that makes it safer. However, it restricts the "choice" of someone to run across 6 lanes of traffic. It is because there can be unintended consequences to this choice and the downside isn't worth giving up on the upside. Now, people do have the option of disobeying it, but they risk a relatively minor fine. It's not like we are putting seat belt violators in jail. They get a $25 ticket in Illinois.

The laws are also written in a way that puts liability in an accident on other drivers in the event of their negligence. Now, if we added in something that said that other drivers are never liable for any injury caused to a person who isn't wearing a seatbelt we may be getting closer to the point where the "decision" doesn't effect others.


I'm not good with the multiple quotes so lets take this in parts...

How is my car and my driving affected by you wearing a seatbelt? It isnt at all.



Crosswalks are not a good comparison at all. If I ran through the middle of the street, I am endangering other drivers. Crossing at a designated crosswalk is following the rules of the road. I'm not advocating driving on sidewalks or thru people's front yards.




The liability is on you because you caused the accident. Whether I am wearing a seatbelt doesnt matter. You caused an accident and you should be liable for the damage you caused.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92106
Location: To the left of my post
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Seems to me like it takes a major collision to cause you to be thrown from your vehicle and the momentum of your car is significantly slowed...A collision that would be extreme enough that even if you were strapped in you probably arent doing much defensive driving afterwards anyway.
There are accidents that wouldn't have even happened with a seatbelt. I'm sure we've all been in a highway situation where we had to slam on the brakes and the seatbelt locked and kept us from going forward. Without a seat belt you would have been in the steering wheel which makes it harder to drive. The same can be said when your car is sideswiped and the momentum is going to push you in either direction.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Hawg Ass wrote:
For those that don't wear them, how in the hell can you listen to that dinging that goes on until you put the belt on?


Be poor and don't own a car new enough to have that bullshit.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 264 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group