It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 5:26 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 279 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:49 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
sinicalypse wrote:
So hey 8000/800000 documents released-- have we found out if they're rounding up the Jews yet? Kids need to sleep at night!

(Also lol they wanted to have a memetic warfare Dept! HA! memes!)


There has been a significant increase in crimes and vandalism of Jewish property. There are definitely reasons for them to be concerned.


Has this been confirmed? Not sure if it has increased or if it's been covered more.


The numbers are always high but there has been an uptick. The president says that liberal groups are committing these crimes and trying to make him look bad.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:51 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
long time guy wrote:
If Obama ordered it then prove it. Obama would be in violation of the law if he did and thus should go to jail. The problem with Trump is that he makes too many baseless accusations and for some odd reason you provide credibility for it. This shouldn't be entertained without proof. Trump's word isn't enough. He is a known liar that lies about everything. If he is telling the truth on this then fine but his track record suggests that this is but another one of his false claims.


I'm just pointing out that according to what you just said, if there is all of this intelligence on Trump it would have had to have been ordered by Obama.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 1:55 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Obama ordered it then prove it. Obama would be in violation of the law if he did and thus should go to jail. The problem with Trump is that he makes too many baseless accusations and for some odd reason you provide credibility for it. This shouldn't be entertained without proof. Trump's word isn't enough. He is a known liar that lies about everything. If he is telling the truth on this then fine but his track record suggests that this is but another one of his false claims.


I'm just pointing out that according to what you just said, if there is all of this intelligence on Trump it would have had to have been ordered by Obama.


Do you think Obama committed a felony? Do you believe that the president has proof? If not do you believe that the president lied?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23560
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Nas wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
sinicalypse wrote:
So hey 8000/800000 documents released-- have we found out if they're rounding up the Jews yet? Kids need to sleep at night!

(Also lol they wanted to have a memetic warfare Dept! HA! memes!)


There has been a significant increase in crimes and vandalism of Jewish property. There are definitely reasons for them to be concerned.


Has this been confirmed? Not sure if it has increased or if it's been covered more.


The numbers are always high but there has been an uptick. The president says that liberal groups are committing these crimes and trying to make him look bad.


But antisemitic crimes are actually at the lowest point they've been (664 in 2015) in the last 10 years (1106 in 1996). It's safer than it's ever been to be Jewish. Isn't that how that works?


Last edited by Juice's Lecture Notes on Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Nas wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Nas wrote:
There has been a significant increase in crimes and vandalism of Jewish property. There are definitely reasons for them to be concerned.


Has this been confirmed? Not sure if it has increased or if it's been covered more.


The numbers are always high but there has been an uptick.

Chet Coppock wrote:
Not high enough.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:11 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Obama ordered it then prove it. Obama would be in violation of the law if he did and thus should go to jail. The problem with Trump is that he makes too many baseless accusations and for some odd reason you provide credibility for it. This shouldn't be entertained without proof. Trump's word isn't enough. He is a known liar that lies about everything. If he is telling the truth on this then fine but his track record suggests that this is but another one of his false claims.


I'm just pointing out that according to what you just said, if there is all of this intelligence on Trump it would have had to have been ordered by Obama.


Do you think Obama committed a felony? Do you believe that the president has proof? If not do you believe that the president lied?


I don't think the president has control of the intelligence community.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Obama ordered it then prove it. Obama would be in violation of the law if he did and thus should go to jail. The problem with Trump is that he makes too many baseless accusations and for some odd reason you provide credibility for it. This shouldn't be entertained without proof. Trump's word isn't enough. He is a known liar that lies about everything. If he is telling the truth on this then fine but his track record suggests that this is but another one of his false claims.


I'm just pointing out that according to what you just said, if there is all of this intelligence on Trump it would have had to have been ordered by Obama.


Do you think Obama committed a felony? Do you believe that the president has proof? If not do you believe that the president lied?


I don't think the president has control of the intelligence community.


That isn't what I asked you. Feel free to answer my questions.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Obama ordered it then prove it. Obama would be in violation of the law if he did and thus should go to jail. The problem with Trump is that he makes too many baseless accusations and for some odd reason you provide credibility for it. This shouldn't be entertained without proof. Trump's word isn't enough. He is a known liar that lies about everything. If he is telling the truth on this then fine but his track record suggests that this is but another one of his false claims.


I'm just pointing out that according to what you just said, if there is all of this intelligence on Trump it would have had to have been ordered by Obama.


If it weren't ordered by Obama then the guy would have been fired. Unfortunately Obama isn't the President but Trump is which means the guy still would have to be fired. There really isn't a such thing as a Rogue CIA Director. They take their marching orders from whomever the President happens to be. The President will express plausible deniability but that doesn't mean he is telling the truth.


The problem again is that it hasn't been proven too be true. Trump's word isn't enough for me maybe it is for you.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:24 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Obama ordered it then prove it. Obama would be in violation of the law if he did and thus should go to jail. The problem with Trump is that he makes too many baseless accusations and for some odd reason you provide credibility for it. This shouldn't be entertained without proof. Trump's word isn't enough. He is a known liar that lies about everything. If he is telling the truth on this then fine but his track record suggests that this is but another one of his false claims.


I'm just pointing out that according to what you just said, if there is all of this intelligence on Trump it would have had to have been ordered by Obama.


Do you think Obama committed a felony? Do you believe that the president has proof? If not do you believe that the president lied?


I don't think the president has control of the intelligence community.


That isn't what I asked you. Feel free to answer my questions.


I have no idea about your first question. No to your second.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:28 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If Obama ordered it then prove it. Obama would be in violation of the law if he did and thus should go to jail. The problem with Trump is that he makes too many baseless accusations and for some odd reason you provide credibility for it. This shouldn't be entertained without proof. Trump's word isn't enough. He is a known liar that lies about everything. If he is telling the truth on this then fine but his track record suggests that this is but another one of his false claims.


I'm just pointing out that according to what you just said, if there is all of this intelligence on Trump it would have had to have been ordered by Obama.


Do you think Obama committed a felony? Do you believe that the president has proof? If not do you believe that the president lied?


I don't think the president has control of the intelligence community.


That isn't what I asked you. Feel free to answer my questions.


I have no idea about your first question. No to your second.


I asked you what do you think. I didn't ask you what do you know. Your reluctance to answer a few simple questions once again confirms what all of us know. No need answer.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:53 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nas wrote:
I asked you what do you think. I didn't ask you what do you know. Your reluctance to answer a few simple questions once again confirms what all of us know. No need answer.


I don't have a baseless opinion. Isn't that what you criticize Trump for?

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:58 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
I asked you what do you think. I didn't ask you what do you know. Your reluctance to answer a few simple questions once again confirms what all of us know. No need answer.


I don't have a baseless opinion. Isn't that what you criticize Trump for?


You have a lot of opinions. Thanks!

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
No one seems to want to acknowledge that they support him, alas Hitler. To hear people on here tell it the only reason the albatross that is Trump was elected is because he had the good fortune of running against Hillary. No one supports him yet everyone supports him. Hyperbole being used in both instances but the fact of the matter is that the goof could have been stopped by simply not voting for him. Take Hillary out of the equation and he still easily dispatched with the rest of the field.


Its time to really address the Hitler stuff too. If Trump had the ability to be a damn totalitarian there is no doubt that he would. The fact that America has systems in place to prevent it doesn't negate who he happens to be. The asshole implemented the soon to be illegal Muslim ban as soon as he took office. He also scolded the media about the coverage of him. He has attempted to neuter the intelligence communities on numerous occasions. He has ran the Presidency as an autocrat from the moment he took office. Hitler was more than the Holocaust. He had a governing style too and it was no different than any other run of the mill dictator.

Trump has sought to undermine every established institution in this country. That is standard totalitarian practice. Play with it if you like.


Why would this be a bad thing? You said the CIA is out of control.



No they aren't. A properly functioning CIA takes its instructions from the President. Rogue operating Directors are typically whacked. That is what is lost in this. The CIA doesn't operate as a separate entity. They take their marching orders from the President. If he isn't on board then heads roll. That has been the history of how it has operated.


:lol:

Haven't read much on the history of the CIA I see.


No apparently you haven't.


Ike's outgoing speech as President is beware the Military Industrial complex. JFK says he wants to smash the CIA into a thousand pieces and is killed a month later. They did all sorts of covert anti-Castro stuff for decades without the president knowing. There are guys who are at the CIA for decades. You think they wait for orders from the president or reset every 4 years because a new guy is in office? This is only a quick snapshot of what we know. With their endless budgets who knows what they are up to.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
No one seems to want to acknowledge that they support him, alas Hitler. To hear people on here tell it the only reason the albatross that is Trump was elected is because he had the good fortune of running against Hillary. No one supports him yet everyone supports him. Hyperbole being used in both instances but the fact of the matter is that the goof could have been stopped by simply not voting for him. Take Hillary out of the equation and he still easily dispatched with the rest of the field.


Its time to really address the Hitler stuff too. If Trump had the ability to be a damn totalitarian there is no doubt that he would. The fact that America has systems in place to prevent it doesn't negate who he happens to be. The asshole implemented the soon to be illegal Muslim ban as soon as he took office. He also scolded the media about the coverage of him. He has attempted to neuter the intelligence communities on numerous occasions. He has ran the Presidency as an autocrat from the moment he took office. Hitler was more than the Holocaust. He had a governing style too and it was no different than any other run of the mill dictator.

Trump has sought to undermine every established institution in this country. That is standard totalitarian practice. Play with it if you like.


Why would this be a bad thing? You said the CIA is out of control.



No they aren't. A properly functioning CIA takes its instructions from the President. Rogue operating Directors are typically whacked. That is what is lost in this. The CIA doesn't operate as a separate entity. They take their marching orders from the President. If he isn't on board then heads roll. That has been the history of how it has operated.


:lol:

Haven't read much on the history of the CIA I see.


No apparently you haven't.


Ike's outgoing speech as President is beware the Military Industrial complex. JFK says he wants to smash the CIA into a thousand pieces and is killed a month later. They did all sorts of covert anti-Castro stuff for decades without the president knowing. There are guys who are at the CIA for decades. You think they wait for orders from the president or reset every 4 years because a new guy is in office? This is only a quick snapshot of what we know. With their endless budgets who knows what they are up to.



No major operation is ever conducted without the knowledge of the President. The Macro side is conducted under the direction of the president. Micro side isn't. The Covert Castro stuff was conducted by Eisenhower and Kennedy. The CIA wanted Kennedy dead because he sold them out with the Bay of Pigs. The Bay of Pigs perfectly illustrates what I am talking about.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
No major operation is ever conducted without the knowledge of the President. The Macro side is conducted under the direction of the president. Micro side isn't. The Covert Castro stuff was conducted by Eisenhower and Kennedy. The CIA wanted Kennedy dead because he sold them out with the Bay of Pigs. The Bay of Pigs perfectly illustrates what I am talking about.


The Bay of Pigs required military intervention that's why the president was involved. There were major operations being carried out without JFK's knowledge, which is why he said splinter it into a thousand pieces. Your statement no major operation... is simply a article of faith. You have zero way of knowing that.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
No major operation is ever conducted without the knowledge of the President. The Macro side is conducted under the direction of the president. Micro side isn't. The Covert Castro stuff was conducted by Eisenhower and Kennedy. The CIA wanted Kennedy dead because he sold them out with the Bay of Pigs. The Bay of Pigs perfectly illustrates what I am talking about.


The Bay of Pigs required military intervention that's why the president was involved. There were major operations being carried out without JFK's knowledge, which is why he said splinter it into a thousand pieces. Your statement no major operation... is simply a article of faith. You have zero way of knowing that.


Kennedy was aware of the Bay of Pigs operation. Did he know every minute detail? No but he was aware of the plan to overthrow Castro. He sanctioned it. He also knew that the CIA was training Cuban Exiles in one of the Latin American countries too. He wanted the CIA destroyed because of the embarrassment caused by it. He wanted them gone because they failed and he believed that they were useless. It had nothing to do with being ignorant regarding the operation.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
long time guy wrote:

No one seems to want to acknowledge that they support him, alas Hitler. To hear people on here tell it the only reason the albatross that is Trump was elected is because he had the good fortune of running against Hillary. No one supports him yet everyone supports him. Hyperbole being used in both instances but the fact of the matter is that the goof could have been stopped by simply not voting for him. Take Hillary out of the equation and he still easily dispatched with the rest of the field.


Its time to really address the Hitler stuff too. If Trump had the ability to be a damn totalitarian there is no doubt that he would. The fact that America has systems in place to prevent it doesn't negate who he happens to be. The asshole implemented the soon to be illegal Muslim ban as soon as he took office. He also scolded the media about the coverage of him. He has attempted to neuter the intelligence communities on numerous occasions. He has ran the Presidency as an autocrat from the moment he took office. Hitler was more than the Holocaust. He had a governing style too and it was no different than any other run of the mill dictator.

Trump has sought to undermine every established institution in this country. That is standard totalitarian practice. Play with it if you like.

Impossible to take seriously.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 5:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33243
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Someone should take a DUMP on this thread.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 5:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
denisdman wrote:
Someone should take a DUMP on this thread.


You need a safe place?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Nas wrote:
Everyone is collecting data. Of course the government is too. Are you a cash only type of guy? If not every time you swipe your card that data is collected and sold. Every time you search something or visit a website data is collected. This is the world we live in.


yeah this is an old msg to reply to, and i forget if it was you or someone else who played the "HURR DURR THE GOVERNMENT REALLY WANTS TO SPY ON YOUR LAME ASS THROUGH YOUR TV" card, but to <<<that point i wanna point out that even with all this state of the art "Death to privacy" stuff [and this is quite possibly some sort of a controlled leak where maybe the powers that be wanna spook everyone into acting right, akin to stores that have security cameras that arent hooked up to anything] you know, it's not like america stopped having drugs available over the last 5-10yrs as the CIA got all these abilities, and at the very least you figure they'd be able to use all these new toys to figure out who's making bank off of drugs and at least get a nice cut out of it..... let alone worrying what some dipshit in wilmette is up to at 7pm on a tuesday night.

so hey, as long as there's still drugs out there all over the place and my actual neighbors arent getting busted for frivolous shit, i'll be quite alright.... assuming that like, you know, even if you have all of this data you at least need either 1) an insane amount of manpower to parse through it all [esp if you wanna go for real time] or 2) some kind of AI that you bet your sweet ass wouldn't be in these leaks, but would be so "secret" that even decent to proper drug dealers would be safe cuz they're only gonna use that for "the good stuff" which is above all of our paygrades.

honestly, i'd be more worried about this one far-out story i heard about cops having some technology that where they can pull you over and run your ATM/bank cards through a swipe, see how much $$$ is in there, and confiscate whatever they want cuz they might wanna claim it's "drug money" if they pull you over with a quarter of weed or something stupid [yet technically "probable cause", like "i saw [dude] talking to those 3 black guys in hooded sweatshirts on the street corner! [$1250] impound for attempted purchase of marijuana or controlled substances! [and the city keeps that $$$ no matter what, barring a monumental fuck-up in the officer/s writing up the arrest report]

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
No major operation is ever conducted without the knowledge of the President. The Macro side is conducted under the direction of the president. Micro side isn't. The Covert Castro stuff was conducted by Eisenhower and Kennedy. The CIA wanted Kennedy dead because he sold them out with the Bay of Pigs. The Bay of Pigs perfectly illustrates what I am talking about.


The Bay of Pigs required military intervention that's why the president was involved. There were major operations being carried out without JFK's knowledge, which is why he said splinter it into a thousand pieces. Your statement no major operation... is simply a article of faith. You have zero way of knowing that.


Kennedy was aware of the Bay of Pigs operation. Did he know every minute detail? No but he was aware of the plan to overthrow Castro. He sanctioned it. He also knew that the CIA was training Cuban Exiles in one of the Latin American countries too. He wanted the CIA destroyed because of the embarrassment caused by it. He wanted them gone because they failed and he believed that they were useless. It had nothing to do with being ignorant regarding the operation.


There were numerous attempts made on Castro's life that JFK and other presidents did not know about until after the fact. This included attempting to poison Castro with a wet suit that was to be delivered by a personal friend of JFK's without either of them knowing. (You can read about it in the book Brothers by David Talbot). I would call the attempted assassination of a foreign leader a major operation. And this is one that we know about. The CIA is supposed to be secretive, so how do you know they've never carried out a major operation without the knowledge of the president? Even the Bay of Pigs, which you said he knew about, JFK said that he was coerced and tricked into approving. In that instance would you say that the president was in charge of the CIA? Or were they pushing their own agenda, and he was along for the ride?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
No major operation is ever conducted without the knowledge of the President. The Macro side is conducted under the direction of the president. Micro side isn't. The Covert Castro stuff was conducted by Eisenhower and Kennedy. The CIA wanted Kennedy dead because he sold them out with the Bay of Pigs. The Bay of Pigs perfectly illustrates what I am talking about.


The Bay of Pigs required military intervention that's why the president was involved. There were major operations being carried out without JFK's knowledge, which is why he said splinter it into a thousand pieces. Your statement no major operation... is simply a article of faith. You have zero way of knowing that.


Kennedy was aware of the Bay of Pigs operation. Did he know every minute detail? No but he was aware of the plan to overthrow Castro. He sanctioned it. He also knew that the CIA was training Cuban Exiles in one of the Latin American countries too. He wanted the CIA destroyed because of the embarrassment caused by it. He wanted them gone because they failed and he believed that they were useless. It had nothing to do with being ignorant regarding the operation.


There were numerous attempts made on Castro's life that JFK and other presidents did not know about until after the fact. This included attempting to poison Castro with a wet suit that was to be delivered by a personal friend of JFK's without either of them knowing. (You can read about it in the book Brothers by David Talbot). I would call the attempted assassination of a foreign leader a major operation. And this is one that we know about. The CIA is supposed to be secretive, so how do you know they've never carried out a major operation without the knowledge of the president? Even the Bay of Pigs, which you said he knew about, JFK said that he was coerced and tricked into approving. In that instance would you say that the president was in charge of the CIA? Or were they pushing their own agenda, and he was along for the ride?




Kennedy had already given the order to kill Castro so it doesn't matter if he knew the methods to be used. That is what I meant by "plausible deniability". The order to kill Castro came first from Eisenhower then Kennedy. Eisenhower debriefed Kennedy on the Bay of Pigs invasion before he became President so I don't where exactly the trickery occurred. Kennedy hung his director out to dry that is why the CIA hated him. You have to read "Legacy of Ashes" by Tim Weiner. There were at least 8 attempts made on Castro's life by the CIA. The President makes the call on that. This wasn't some Rogue operation done at the behest of the director.


Of course Kennedy is going to say he was tricked but that was his way of trying to save his own ass.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
Kennedy had already given the order to kill Castro so it doesn't matter if he knew the methods to be used. That is what I meant by "plausible deniability". The order to kill Castro came first from Eisenhower then Kennedy. Eisenhower debriefed Kennedy on the Bay of Pigs invasion before he became President so I don't where exactly the trickery occurred. Kennedy hung his director out to dry that is why the CIA hated him. You have to read "Legacy of Ashes" by Tim Weiner. There were at least 8 attempts made on Castro's life by the CIA. The President makes the call on that. This wasn't some Rogue operation done at the behest of the director.


Of course Kennedy is going to say he was tricked but that was his way of trying to save his own ass.


Castro came to the US in 59. Eisenhower ordered him dead? Seems like the perfect opportunity.

On the Bay of Pigs-Kennedy was the liar? Not the group that tried to call for a full scale invasion of Cuba. This is entirely an article of faith on your behalf. You have zero way to prove that the CIA calls the president before each "major operation" as you put it. Kennedy fired the CIA chief who he felt lied to him about the Bay of Pigs. If the CIA was a benevolent organization that serves "at the pleasure of the president" as you are asserting, then why would the CIA hate him for making changes? In your own post above you seem to assert that the CIA has it's own political agenda. If you grant that, then even you have to admit that it's likely the CIA has done things against the political views of the sitting president.
Presidents come and go. The CIA remains in place.

If the president is so in charge of the CIA why are all of these leaks about Trump and Russia coming out? Where is this information coming from?

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Kennedy had already given the order to kill Castro so it doesn't matter if he knew the methods to be used. That is what I meant by "plausible deniability". The order to kill Castro came first from Eisenhower then Kennedy. Eisenhower debriefed Kennedy on the Bay of Pigs invasion before he became President so I don't where exactly the trickery occurred. Kennedy hung his director out to dry that is why the CIA hated him. You have to read "Legacy of Ashes" by Tim Weiner. There were at least 8 attempts made on Castro's life by the CIA. The President makes the call on that. This wasn't some Rogue operation done at the behest of the director.


Of course Kennedy is going to say he was tricked but that was his way of trying to save his own ass.


Castro came to the US in 59. Eisenhower ordered him dead? Seems like the perfect opportunity.

On the Bay of Pigs-Kennedy was the liar? Not the group that tried to call for a full scale invasion of Cuba. This is entirely an article of faith on your behalf. You have zero way to prove that the CIA calls the president before each "major operation" as you put it. Kennedy fired the CIA chief who he felt lied to him about the Bay of Pigs. If the CIA was a benevolent organization that serves "at the pleasure of the president" as you are asserting, then why would the CIA hate him for making changes? In your own post above you seem to assert that the CIA has it's own political agenda. If you grant that, then even you have to admit that it's likely the CIA has done things against the political views of the sitting president.
Presidents come and go. The CIA remains in place.

If the president is so in charge of the CIA why are all of these leaks about Trump and Russia coming out? Where is this information coming from?



You have no proof that Presidents are unaware. You are making stuff up. The Bay of Pigs operation was initiated by Eisenhower and Carried out By Kennedy. Kennedy fired the chief because someone had to take the fall. What exactly was Kennedy lied to about? The CIA may have misled him about the level of support inside of CUba for such an operation but that doesn't mean that Kennedy was in the dark about the actual operation. He knew all of the key components and that is why he took responsibility for it.


If you think that employees of the President are going off half cocked and conducting operations that potentially may start WWIII then you really don't understand how it works.


The CIA (as I keep stating) hated Kennedy for throwing them under the bus after the invasion. He took measures to limit their power and he blamed them for the failed operation. Kennedy tried to distance himself from it even though he was the person that gave the ok. That is why they were angry. They also blamed him for not providing more air support once the operation began to go sour.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
You have no proof that Presidents are unaware. You are making stuff up. The Bay of Pigs operation was initiated by Eisenhower and Carried out By Kennedy. Kennedy fired the chief because someone had to take the fall. What exactly was Kennedy lied to about? The CIA may have misled him about the level of support inside of CUba for such an operation but that doesn't mean that Kennedy was in the dark about the actual operation. He knew all of the key components and that is why he took responsibility for it.


If you think that employees of the President are going off half cocked and conducting operations that potentially may start WWIII then you really don't understand how it works.



The CIA (as I keep stating) hated Kennedy for throwing them under the bus after the invasion. He took measures to limit their power and he blamed them for the failed operation. Kennedy tried to distance himself from it even though he was the person that gave the ok. That is why they were angry.


You were closer to the truth when you said Hitler was elected.

CIA officials were mad because Kennedy did not send in the Navy and Air Force to back the Bay of Pigs. Top CIA guys called him a coward. Do you think the Bay of Pigs was a good plan? Or was it a way to trick the president into sending in American troops to overthrow Castro? They knew that there was no support on the island, and that American military intervention was necessary.

You certainly have a higher burden of proof in this instance because it's preposterous to think than one man can possibly ok all of the major operations of all of the intelligence agencies including an organization as large as the CIA, while also commanding the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Coast Guide, dealing with Congress, foreign leaders, business leaders, all of the other federal agencies and other domestic issues.

You also failed to explain where all the leaks about Trump are coming from if the president controls these agencies absolutely, and they serve at his pleasure.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
long time guy wrote:
You have no proof that Presidents are unaware. You are making stuff up. The Bay of Pigs operation was initiated by Eisenhower and Carried out By Kennedy. Kennedy fired the chief because someone had to take the fall. What exactly was Kennedy lied to about? The CIA may have misled him about the level of support inside of CUba for such an operation but that doesn't mean that Kennedy was in the dark about the actual operation. He knew all of the key components and that is why he took responsibility for it.


If you think that employees of the President are going off half cocked and conducting operations that potentially may start WWIII then you really don't understand how it works.



The CIA (as I keep stating) hated Kennedy for throwing them under the bus after the invasion. He took measures to limit their power and he blamed them for the failed operation. Kennedy tried to distance himself from it even though he was the person that gave the ok. That is why they were angry.


You were closer to the truth when you said Hitler was elected.

CIA officials were mad because Kennedy did not send in the Navy and Air Force to back the Bay of Pigs. Top CIA guys called him a coward. Do you think the Bay of Pigs was a good plan? Or was it a way to trick the president into sending in American troops to overthrow Castro? They knew that there was no support on the island, and that American military intervention was necessary.

You certainly have a higher burden of proof in this instance because it's preposterous to think than one man can possibly ok all of the major operations of all of the intelligence agencies including an organization as large as the CIA, while also commanding the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Coast Guide, dealing with Congress, foreign leaders, business leaders, all of the other federal agencies and other domestic issues.

You also failed to explain where all the leaks about Trump are coming from if the president controls these agencies absolutely, and they serve at his pleasure.



You are conflating too many issues. The Bay of Pigs operation was an Eisenhower operation that Kennedy inherited. That isn't exactly breaking news either. The invasion itself was ok'd by Kennedy and carried out by the CIA director. Kennedy didn't plan each ad every aspect of it an I never said that he did. My point is that the CIA director did not make the decision to overthrow Castro. Kennedy did. How it got done was planned by the CIA but the MAJOR decision i.e. to overthrow Castro was Kennedy's.

Your assertion is flat wrong. The CIA director provided bad intelligence regarding support for an overthrow. It still doesn't mean that Kennedy was tricked into invading. He cherry picked intelligence that supported the conclusion that Castro could be overthrown

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Quote:
President Kennedy faced a foe more relentless than Khrushchev, just across the Potomac: the bellicose Joint Chiefs of Staff argued for the deployment of nuclear weapons and kept pressing to invade Cuba. A presidential historian reveals that Kennedy's success in fending them off may have been his most consequential victory.


https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... ry/309496/

It certainly does not seem like the CIA was working for the president in this case. More like he had to fight to reign them in.

And you have yet to offer any explanation of the leaks about Trump.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Quote:
President Kennedy faced a foe more relentless than Khrushchev, just across the Potomac: the bellicose Joint Chiefs of Staff argued for the deployment of nuclear weapons and kept pressing to invade Cuba. A presidential historian reveals that Kennedy's success in fending them off may have been his most consequential victory.


https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... ry/309496/

It certainly does not seem like the CIA was working for the president in this case. More like he had to fight to reign them in.

And you have yet to offer any explanation of the leaks about Trump.



Does this sound like a guy that didn't have control over this?

Bay of Pigs invasion: Kennedy’s Cuban catastrophe | History Extra
http://m.historyextra.com/article/bbc-h ... atastrophe

You are woefully misinformed about the Bay of Pigs invasion

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Quote:
President Kennedy faced a foe more relentless than Khrushchev, just across the Potomac: the bellicose Joint Chiefs of Staff argued for the deployment of nuclear weapons and kept pressing to invade Cuba. A presidential historian reveals that Kennedy's success in fending them off may have been his most consequential victory.


https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... ry/309496/

It certainly does not seem like the CIA was working for the president in this case. More like he had to fight to reign them in.

And you have yet to offer any explanation of the leaks about Trump.



Do you even pay attention to the News?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2017 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Quote:
President Kennedy faced a foe more relentless than Khrushchev, just across the Potomac: the bellicose Joint Chiefs of Staff argued for the deployment of nuclear weapons and kept pressing to invade Cuba. A presidential historian reveals that Kennedy's success in fending them off may have been his most consequential victory.


https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... ry/309496/

It certainly does not seem like the CIA was working for the president in this case. More like he had to fight to reign them in.

And you have yet to offer any explanation of the leaks about Trump.



Do you even pay attention to the News?


You've run out of arguments on this topic, and instead want to talk about Hitler and be passive aggressive. I accept that you are done with this topic, and say happy Friday.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 279 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Drunk Squirrel and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group