Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
That makes my point. If they can't do it with all their money and intelligence and technology then a group preschoolers shouldn't stand a chance.
Revolutionary War.
The Alamo.
Vietnam.
Why didn't the clearly more powerful side win then?
It's the same reason we have struggled in Afghanistan and the same reason why Russia did as well. It's not easy to win a fight on terrain that you aren't familiar with. The natives will always have an advantage. This has been true throughout history. That wasn't true in this case. A group of preschoolers were able to successfully attack our homeland despite our knowledge and strength.
exactly. by the time the british showed up to fight the revolutionary war the colonists obviously had a tactical advantage in knowing the terrain better than the british, who were so cocky/egotistical that they showed up to fight in fucking red military uniforms (which is a great color if you wanna camouflage yourself with blood-n-guts) marching in some stupid formal formation while the colonists did guerrilla warfare hiding up in trees and/or terrain and started picking them off in big #s because, again, they were all lined up right next to each other in their bright red "shoot me" colored uniforms.
and brick forgot about the sequel to the revolutionary war (like most do), the war of 1812, where again england thought they could just roll up in here and run over us with little to no problems whatsoever (as they never formally recognized us as a sovereign nation after the revolutionary war and were big on impressment of american sailors between 1790-1812). the best part of that was the battle of new orleans where andrew jackson commanded a ragtag unit with a bunch of indians(ha)/slaves and set up his cannon-fortified battle lines and the cheeky brits ended up fortifying themselves behind barrels of molasses to defend themselves from incoming cannonballs.
imagine a red hot cannonball hitting a barrel of molasses; that's going to result in searing gobs of piping hot molasses hitting everything within the blast radius, which burned the troops and got molasses into their cannons which caused them to become very impotent very quickly. i had a history teacher liken the battle of new orleans to somebody coming over to your house looking to start shit with you, but as they walk up to your front door you calmly drop a brick on their head as they're walking in and beat under armour by a couple'a hundred of years in coming up with the slogan "PROTECT THIS HOUSE!"
the difference nowadays is that the british back then didn't have drones and patriot missiles and well, a vastly-superior airforce to go and, say, bomb the tree/s that the guerrilla native snipers are hanging out in. i reckon that's the "preschoolers" thing that you're preaching here, is that the difference between the might of the US armed forces compared to whatever group of middle-east ragtag fighters is like an adult beating up a preschooler. the vast technological advantages afforded to the USA army completely neutralize the homefield advantage that the middle-easterners technically have. it'd be like the bears playing new trier @ new trier or something.
_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?