It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 10:29 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 543 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 19  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan's attacks on us(for not attacking Trump harsh enough) read like a Julie DiCaro twitter timeline.

Nope. Nice try though. Just fade away like you always do when losing a debate or actually come with something of substance. Until that time, I'll just assume leash is the alpha in your relationship and is speaking for you.

LOL at Bob using "US". So desperate to have anyone jump on this ignorant take with him.

The only thing that is actually baffling to me is leash and Bob criticize Trump constantly on here(unlike Bob, I recall what I read and won't label him based on one thread). Bob further acknowledges he is racist but not a supremacist. When pressed for the difference, Bob says supremacists will enforce power to promote racist views. I'm still struggling to see how that doesn't completely fall in line with Trump as a private businessman and politician. The whole thread is strange to me. It would make much more sense if you replaced leash and Bob with JLN and Chas. I also don't want that to come off as a partisan thing. I'm just confused at how someone can think someone is prejudiced but not supremacist although they are in the most powerful position on Earth.


You are frothing at the mouth to call someone racist. It's like an addiction.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Caller Bob wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
On the other hand, I would like to hear the argument for why someone would be upset by the skin color of a family member's significant other.

If not a belief in supremacy of their own race, what is it?


I'm pretty sure back then, many black families would have been uneasy about someone dating/marrying a white person as well.

And those black families would get the same label as the white ones.

Was covered brilliantly on All in the Family

Caller Bob wrote:
Believe it or not, it goes beyond basic racism and into anthropological/cultural topics that are clearly above your head...or at the very least not something you want to even consider.

Do you really think this fake intellectual pondering is going to save your terrible opinion?

No one denies or has even argued about the root cause of the beliefs, we are talking about the actual beliefs themselves.

And cultural history is not an excuse. If it were you'd have to excuse rapists and murderers, too.


Yeah Julie, our old school grandparents that didn't know any better where just like rapists and murderers. Keep it up with that brush, Jules.

:lol:

See you've let that DiCaro thread ruin you.

The only thing worse than a whiny SJW is the idiot who responds to them so far the other way they end up partially justifying what the SJW's platform.

No rational person agrees with the insane Julie's of the world. It doesnt make you special or intelligent to recognize that sort of thing.

But if you bring the anthropology\culture card excuse into play for Nana, it's now in play for everyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
FavreFan wrote:
The only thing that is actually baffling to me is leash and Bob criticize Trump constantly on here(unlike Bob, I recall what I read and won't label him based on one thread). Bob further acknowledges he is racist but not a supremacist. When pressed for the difference, Bob says supremacists will enforce power to promote racist views. I'm still struggling to see how that doesn't completely fall in line with Trump as a private businessman and politician. The whole thread is strange to me. It would make much more sense if you replaced leash and Bob with JLN and Chas. I also don't want that to come off as a partisan thing. I'm just confused at how someone can think someone is prejudiced but not supremacist although they are in the most powerful position on Earth.



Nuanced thinking makes FF's brain tired!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Quick, someone use a slur so FF and RPB can get their rocks off!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:50 pm
Posts: 6721
pizza_Place: Parts Unknown
FavreFan wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Caller Bob putting in work in this thread

Don't be a Blue Falcon to your fellow Americans. They need you now more than ever.


I never want to be a BF. Can someone give me a quick rundown on where we are in this thread? So I can help my fellow Americans.

_________________
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Have a terrible night and die in MANY fires.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
leashyourkids wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan's attacks on us(for not attacking Trump harsh enough) read like a Julie DiCaro twitter timeline.

Nope. Nice try though. Just fade away like you always do when losing a debate or actually come with something of substance. Until that time, I'll just assume leash is the alpha in your relationship and is speaking for you.

LOL at Bob using "US". So desperate to have anyone jump on this ignorant take with him.

The only thing that is actually baffling to me is leash and Bob criticize Trump constantly on here(unlike Bob, I recall what I read and won't label him based on one thread). Bob further acknowledges he is racist but not a supremacist. When pressed for the difference, Bob says supremacists will enforce power to promote racist views. I'm still struggling to see how that doesn't completely fall in line with Trump as a private businessman and politician. The whole thread is strange to me. It would make much more sense if you replaced leash and Bob with JLN and Chas. I also don't want that to come off as a partisan thing. I'm just confused at how someone can think someone is prejudiced but not supremacist although they are in the most powerful position on Earth.


You are frothing at the mouth to call someone racist. It's like an addiction.

Yeah, I dunno, once again I think this is a very baffling take. Donald Trump IS racist. Any opinion to the contrary I think necessarily has to ignore basically his entire public life and business profile, as well as his political leanings.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah, I dunno, once again I think this is a very baffling take. Donald Trump IS racist. Any opinion to the contrary I think necessarily has to ignore basically his entire public life and business profile, as well as his political leanings.


Yep. And that was agreed and signed upon by all parties about 5 pages ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
ToxicMasculinity wrote:
Caller Bob putting in work in this thread

Don't be a Blue Falcon to your fellow Americans. They need you now more than ever.


I never want to be a BF. Can someone give me a quick rundown on where we are in this thread? So I can help my fellow Americans.

I think we are ready to tar and feather anyone not willing to say Trump is Hitler 2.0. Like us or leave us!

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Yeah, I dunno, once again I think this is a very baffling take. Donald Trump IS racist. Any opinion to the contrary I think necessarily has to ignore basically his entire public life and business profile, as well as his political leanings.


Yep. And that was agreed and signed upon by all parties about 5 pages ago.

Yeah, we already covered your nonsensical "Trump is racist but not supremacist because supramacists are in positions of power(and I guess Trump isn't) take. It's bad. It's worse you're double downing on it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Nas wrote:
denisdman wrote:

Because he is saying and doing all sorts of stupid things in the name of political expediency. He is simply pandering. I don't believe that makes him a white supremacist. He may in fact be one, but it's not like he is trying to recreate segregation or ban interracial marriage, which would be the hallmark policies of a supremacist.


I'm not saying that he is. I'm not saying that what you believe isn't true. I don't just understand how you and others can't see how a reasonable person would believe that he is.


That's a fair response. I just feel it's a very very large hill to climb to label someone that way because of the all the historical connotations in that word. When we take such loaded words and apply them broadly, it reduces the value of the label. For instance, I think it is one thing to be prejudiced, another to be a racist, and another to be a supremacist. It's not a bright line test, but rather a continuum.

Prejudiced- You see a person different from yourself and immediately make negative assumptions solely because of his race or nationality.
Racist- There is an active dislike of another race.
Supremacist- Taking actions to separate oneself and advocate policies that separate groups through custom and laws. In many cases, these individuals would engage in hate crime styled violence or intimidation of other groups.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
It took a while to catch up on all these pages. Wow is an apt word.

You guys going back and forth is something. Should it really be that hard to accept someone is racist and inherent to that they must feel in some way superior to that person they feel that way about? I don't think so.

At the same time it is not always correct to say because someone is racist given the above comment and definitively state they are "white supremacist".

It was mentioned about being born in the 80's. Well some of us here came from a different world born in the 60's. We have a different view of what a white supremacist is. They are very real and no they do not always wear robes and swastikas.

In my world an example of a racist would be someone that says I will not hire or rent to this person because they are black, wear braids and probably lives the thug life. That very same racist person though probably has neighbors, friends, bosses and even equal colleagues that may be black. They do not see any problem there.

A true "white supremacist" on the other hand in almost every instance hates and despises non whites. This also usually includes the 12 joos running the world's money by the way. They refuse to acknowledge the human value on blacks at all. They will not even entertain any aspect of accepting them at any cultural or financial level.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
denisdman wrote:
That's a fair response. I just feel it's a very very large hill to climb to label someone that way because of the all the historical connotations in that word. When we take such loaded words and apply them broadly, it reduces the value of the label. For instance, I think it is one thing to be prejudiced, another to be a racist, and another to be a supremacist. It's not a bright line test, but rather a continuum.

Prejudiced- You see a person different from yourself and immediately make negative assumptions solely because of his race or nationality.
Racist- There is an active dislike of another race.
Supremacist- Taking actions to separate oneself and advocate policies that separate groups through custom and laws. In many cases, these individuals would engage in hate crime styled violence or intimidation of other groups.

I simply fail to see how you find it objectionable to call Donald Trump a supremacist based on your own criteria.

And I think you know it's simply wrong to assert a person needs to engage in hate crimes in order to be fairly labeled a supremacist. Maybe George Wallace was just misunderstood?

I think I have been as critical on the left as most people here, yet I fail to understand the reticence to call a spade a spade when it comes to this stuff.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
leashyourkids wrote:
Quick, someone use a slur so FF and RPB can get their rocks off!

Honestly, I think the volume of prejudice and racism has been and will continue to dissipate.

I feel like the age cut off is around 45-50 now. Most people those ages or younger are pretty tolerant race wise.


And if my grandkids say I was a homophobic asshole in my youth, they'll be correct.

And if Im still a homophobic asshole at 75, that i grew up in the 80s will be no excuse.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
pittmike wrote:
It took a while to catch up on all these pages. Wow is an apt word.

You guys going back and forth is something. Should it really be that hard to accept someone is racist and inherent to that they must feel in some way superior to that person they feel that way about? I don't think so.

At the same time it is not always correct to say because someone is racist given the above comment and definitively state they are "white supremacist".

It was mentioned about being born in the 80's. Well some of us here came from a different world born in the 60's. We have a different view of what a white supremacist is. They are very real and no they do not always wear robes and swastikas.

In my world an example of a racist would be someone that says I will not hire or rent to this person because they are black, wear braids and probably lives the thug life. That very same racist person though probably has neighbors, friends, bosses and even equal colleagues that may be black. They do not see any problem there.

A true "white supremacist" on the other hand in almost every instance hates and despises non whites. This also usually includes the 12 joos running the world's money by the way. They refuse to acknowledge the human value on blacks at all. They will not even entertain any aspect of accepting them at any cultural or financial level.

This is a fair point. I don't entirely agree with you but I understand where you are coming from. To me, a supremacist is someone who believes his group of people to be superior to all others, and devalues the liberties and humanity in others based on that belief. To me, Donald Trump fits that defintition to a T.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
This also usually includes the 12 joos running the world's money by the way. They refuse to acknowledge the human value on blacks at all. They will not even entertain any aspect of accepting them at any cultural or financial level.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Im so glad you post here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
The only thing that is actually baffling to me is leash and Bob criticize Trump constantly on here(unlike Bob, I recall what I read and won't label him based on one thread). Bob further acknowledges he is racist but not a supremacist. When pressed for the difference, Bob says supremacists will enforce power to promote racist views. I'm still struggling to see how that doesn't completely fall in line with Trump as a private businessman and politician. The whole thread is strange to me. It would make much more sense if you replaced leash and Bob with JLN and Chas. I also don't want that to come off as a partisan thing. I'm just confused at how someone can think someone is prejudiced but not supremacist although they are in the most powerful position on Earth.



Nuanced thinking makes FF's brain tired!

You have yet to show even an ounce of nuance in this thread, nor have you even attempted to defend your own position. Just go back to baseball trolling and let adults speak here. Thanks.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
FavreFan wrote:
denisdman wrote:
That's a fair response. I just feel it's a very very large hill to climb to label someone that way because of the all the historical connotations in that word. When we take such loaded words and apply them broadly, it reduces the value of the label. For instance, I think it is one thing to be prejudiced, another to be a racist, and another to be a supremacist. It's not a bright line test, but rather a continuum.

Prejudiced- You see a person different from yourself and immediately make negative assumptions solely because of his race or nationality.
Racist- There is an active dislike of another race.
Supremacist- Taking actions to separate oneself and advocate policies that separate groups through custom and laws. In many cases, these individuals would engage in hate crime styled violence or intimidation of other groups.

I simply fail to see how you find it objectionable to call Donald Trump a supremacist based on your own criteria.

And I think you know it's simply wrong to assert a person needs to engage in hate crimes in order to be fairly labeled a supremacist. Maybe George Wallace was just misunderstood?

I think I have been as critical on the left as most people here, yet I fail to understand the reticence to call a spade a spade when it comes to this stuff.


:shock: Now it comes out.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Quick, someone use a slur so FF and RPB can get their rocks off!

Honestly, I think the volume of prejudice and racism has been and will continue to dissipate.

I feel like the age cut off is around 45-50 now. Most people those ages or younger are pretty tolerant race wise.


And if my grandkids say I was a homophobic asshole in my youth, they'll be correct.

And if Im still a homophobic asshole at 75, that i grew up in the 80s will be no excuse.

Homophobic? You're still stuck in the 1990's my man. Tell me how you feel about transgendered pre-teens so I can tell if you are a true ally or not.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40940
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
FavreFan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
It took a while to catch up on all these pages. Wow is an apt word.

You guys going back and forth is something. Should it really be that hard to accept someone is racist and inherent to that they must feel in some way superior to that person they feel that way about? I don't think so.

At the same time it is not always correct to say because someone is racist given the above comment and definitively state they are "white supremacist".

It was mentioned about being born in the 80's. Well some of us here came from a different world born in the 60's. We have a different view of what a white supremacist is. They are very real and no they do not always wear robes and swastikas.

In my world an example of a racist would be someone that says I will not hire or rent to this person because they are black, wear braids and probably lives the thug life. That very same racist person though probably has neighbors, friends, bosses and even equal colleagues that may be black. They do not see any problem there.

A true "white supremacist" on the other hand in almost every instance hates and despises non whites. This also usually includes the 12 joos running the world's money by the way. They refuse to acknowledge the human value on blacks at all. They will not even entertain any aspect of accepting them at any cultural or financial level.

This is a fair point. I don't entirely agree with you but I understand where you are coming from. To me, a supremacist is someone who believes his group of people to be superior to all others, and devalues the liberties and humanity in others based on that belief. To me, Donald Trump fits that defintition to a T.


Could be. All I said earlier was a I am not sure.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Quick, someone use a slur so FF and RPB can get their rocks off!

Honestly, I think the volume of prejudice and racism has been and will continue to dissipate.

I feel like the age cut off is around 45-50 now. Most people those ages or younger are pretty tolerant race wise.


And if my grandkids say I was a homophobic asshole in my youth, they'll be correct.

And if Im still a homophobic asshole at 75, that i grew up in the 80s will be no excuse.

Homophobic? You're still stuck in the 1990's my man. Tell me how you feel about transgendered pre-teens so I can tell if you are a true ally or not.

I dont think they should be able to vote.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
FavreFan wrote:
denisdman wrote:
That's a fair response. I just feel it's a very very large hill to climb to label someone that way because of the all the historical connotations in that word. When we take such loaded words and apply them broadly, it reduces the value of the label. For instance, I think it is one thing to be prejudiced, another to be a racist, and another to be a supremacist. It's not a bright line test, but rather a continuum.

Prejudiced- You see a person different from yourself and immediately make negative assumptions solely because of his race or nationality.
Racist- There is an active dislike of another race.
Supremacist- Taking actions to separate oneself and advocate policies that separate groups through custom and laws. In many cases, these individuals would engage in hate crime styled violence or intimidation of other groups.

I simply fail to see how you find it objectionable to call Donald Trump a supremacist based on your own criteria.

And I think you know it's simply wrong to assert a person needs to engage in hate crimes in order to be fairly labeled a supremacist. Maybe George Wallace was just misunderstood?

I think I have been as critical on the left as most people here, yet I fail to understand the reticence to call a spade a spade when it comes to this stuff.


The term racist was used and continues to be used so often that whites roll their eyes when they hear it. It is thrown around casually to describe every reason why minorities are disadvantaged.

"Hollywood is racist"- Is it a shock that mass market studios create movies that appeal to the mass market?
"Cops are racist"- This one probably has the most legs, but it's still a very broad brush.
"Colleges are racist"- Have you seen the average scores by racial category? If they are racist, it is against Asians.

If you call Trump a supremacist, you've got a very large bucket of Americans in that camp. Now, you want to use the term prejudiced, and yeah that's a pretty big percentage.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
What do you get when a gay Eskimo marries a black guy?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Does believing white credit is superior to black credit make me a white supremacist?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41485
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Don Tiny wrote:
Does believing white credit is superior to black credit make me a white supremacist?


Worse, an insurance adjuster.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33242
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Let me take this from another angle-

When you hear Hawk or Gruden call a player "the greatest", every single broadcast, do you put much weight in that opinion? No, you basically laugh about it and discount what was said. You should want terms with strong connotations to retain those meanings as a way to separate one label from another.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Caller Bob wrote:
What do you get when a gay Eskimo marries a black guy?

Moint's Pal

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15198
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
there are a lot of people who consider themselves not to be supremacist in the States, but were they to go to say, South Africa or certain places in South America, they would consider their way of life to be superior to those ways of life, and were they to be involved in say, construction projects, or any infrastructure, would consider those people to be below them because they approach and do life a very different way than we do.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Is it possible for someone to be a racist and not be a white supremacist?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
denisdman wrote:

The term racist was used and continues to be used so often that whites roll their eyes when they hear it. It is thrown around casually to describe every reason why minorities are disadvantaged.

I used to be that guy.

But on the other hand overuse of the label doesn't = it doesn't exist... and a lot of people do act that way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Jemele Hill
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
denisdman wrote:
Let me take this from another angle-

When you hear Hawk or Gruden call a player "the greatest", every single broadcast, do you put much weight in that opinion? No, you basically laugh about it and discount what was said. You should want terms with strong connotations to retain those meanings as a way to separate one label from another.

I completely agree with this although I admit to occasionally being an offender myself. I think it's absolutely incorrect to apply this to Trump though. I don't know what more he can do outside of actually proposing racial concentration camps to convince people he is indeed racist. This is something that has far preceeded his political career.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Last edited by FavreFan on Thu Sep 14, 2017 1:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 543 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group