It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:00 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 149 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

What would be considered a 2016 Cubs choke?
Missing the playoffs completely 30%  30%  [ 17 ]
Losing the Wild Card Game 20%  20%  [ 11 ]
Losing in the NLDS 21%  21%  [ 12 ]
Losing in the NLCS 14%  14%  [ 8 ]
Losing in the World Series 11%  11%  [ 6 ]
Only winning three consecutive World Series 4%  4%  [ 2 ]
Total votes : 56
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93656
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's the dumbest excuse in sports that the MLB playoffs are a crap shoot and don't matter.

Its not a total crap shoot. It is the sport with the most disparity between reg season and playoffs though. I could see not liking that.
So is it a crap shoot or not?

:lol:

Classic

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Everything has randomness in it in all sports

More in baseball than any major sport. Also the small sample size of playoffs vs regular season. In the NFL the playoffs are 25% as long as the season. NBA and NHL similar. Baseball post season is 1/16th of a regular season.



Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If in the playoffs, the best team is not at a fairly large advantage over the other teams they are better than then skill doesn't matter much. How could it?

This is insane.

So if two competitors in any competition are close in skill, skill ceases to matter?

I disagree.
Huh?

You need to keep in perspective what the argument actually is here. It is about someone saying "The baseball playoffs are a crap shoot". It isn't about two teams being close in skill. It is about all teams having roughly the same chance of winning when it starts. If that is true, unless all teams are equally skilled(and they aren't) then that indicates that skill doesn't really matter and instead it is mostly just a series of coin flips that eventually puts one team as the champion that isn't any more deserving than any other team in terms of how good they actually are.

So, it's very important to establish whether you and others also think that the baseball playoffs are a "crap shoot" or not because if you think that then skill of the teams really doesn't matter. As Don Tiny's Harvard guys said, you could just draw straws for the champion then.

Personally, and this is controversial, I think the best team in the MLB playoffs is much more likely to win than most of the other teams.

As I offered last year though, I'll make a bet with anyone who wants to let me pick half the MLB teams in the playoffs, and if they win the World Series I win and get the money. If none of them do, I'll pay you whatever I would have won + 10%. If the baseball playoffs are a crap shoot that should be a bet that MANY will take.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16732
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Most would agree 2003 was a choke.
Well, leash doesn't.


If 2003 wasn't a choke (not only within a game, but a series), then I don't know what is.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:16 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
And we're also allowed to call you out on your opinions, when you talk out of both sides of your mouth as I pointed out.


I'm also allowed to give ol' Kirkwood a lesson on the glorious season that was the 2005 MLB season. The White Sox were the best team in the American League from Opening Day until they won the World Series. That is a fact.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19620
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Baseball is a game of time and repetition. Other sports really aren't. I can watch two minutes of Jordan and Boilermaker Rick on a basketball court and know who is the better player. If I watch BRick and Trout bat ten times each I'll still really have no clue which guy is better.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
:lol: It has more randomness than any other sport. It doesn't have to be purely random to be more random than all others. And that absolutely is a real thing.



Baseball is a game of time and repetition. Other sports really aren't. I can watch two minutes of Jordan and Boilermaker Rick on a basketball court and know who is the better player. If I watch BRick and Trout bat ten times each I'll still really have no clue which guy is better.

But we're not really deciding who is the best in a vacuum (HEY IMU!), we're deciding who is the best in a situation that every player, executive, manager, coach, and fan knows is coming.


Agreed. This concept is apparently completely foreign to some, though. I'm sure George Brett often went 0-for-5 in a game, but Michael Jordan rarely, if ever, scored less than 10 or even 20. Baseball is a game in which weird anomalies play themselves out over time, which is what makes it work.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
IMU wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
IMU wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
like that seattle team that won 120 games and choked.

When did that happen?


nobody remembers when because they are losers. The 2001 Ms won exactly 120 games before the Yanks dispatched them.

Oh did they now? I think you better check your facts, sir.


116 wins in the regular season. 4 wins in the playoffs.

120 wins.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80568
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
conns7901 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

Baseball is a game of time and repetition. Other sports really aren't. I can watch two minutes of Jordan and Boilermaker Rick on a basketball court and know who is the better player. If I watch BRick and Trout bat ten times each I'll still really have no clue which guy is better.


:lol: :lol: :lol:


:lol: That may be an extreme example. I might have some idea. The point remains that you can't tell the difference between Danny Murphy and Babe Ruth over two weeks worth of games.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Most would agree 2003 was a choke.
Well, leash doesn't.


If 2003 wasn't a choke (not only within a game, but a series), then I don't know what is.


I didn't really say it wasn't; I just said I don't care, as it's a nebulous term. Ultimately, they lost.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's the dumbest excuse in sports that the MLB playoffs are a crap shoot and don't matter.

Its not a total crap shoot. It is the sport with the most disparity between reg season and playoffs though. I could see not liking that.
So is it a crap shoot or not?

:lol:

Classic

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Everything has randomness in it in all sports

More in baseball than any major sport. Also the small sample size of playoffs vs regular season. In the NFL the playoffs are 25% as long as the season. NBA and NHL similar. Baseball post season is 1/16th of a regular season.



Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If in the playoffs, the best team is not at a fairly large advantage over the other teams they are better than then skill doesn't matter much. How could it?

This is insane.

So if two competitors in any competition are close in skill, skill ceases to matter?

I disagree.
Huh?

You need to keep in perspective what the argument actually is here. It is about someone saying "The baseball playoffs are a crap shoot". It isn't about two teams being close in skill. It is about all teams having roughly the same chance of winning when it starts. If that is true, unless all teams are equally skilled(and they aren't) then that indicates that skill doesn't really matter and instead it is mostly just a series of coin flips that eventually puts one team as the champion that isn't any more deserving than any other team in terms of how good they actually are.

So, it's very important to establish whether you and others also think that the baseball playoffs are a "crap shoot" or not because if you think that then skill of the teams really doesn't matter. As Don Tiny's Harvard guys said, you could just draw straws for the champion then.

Personally, and this is controversial, I think the best team in the MLB playoffs is much more likely to win than most of the other teams.

As I offered last year though, I'll make a bet with anyone who wants to let me pick half the MLB teams in the playoffs, and if they win the World Series I win and get the money. If none of them do, I'll pay you whatever I would have won + 10%. If the baseball playoffs are a crap shoot that should be a bet that MANY will take.


:lol: I believe RPB and I have both stated numerous times that we don't think it's a total crapshoot, but it's closer to a crapshoot than any other sport.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32164
pizza_Place: Milano's
MUST.BE.BINARY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93656
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
:lol: I believe RPB and I have both stated numerous times that we don't think it's a total crapshoot, but it's closer to a crapshoot than any other sport.
The problem is that you and him both seemed to have jumped in when I was responding to others who do think it is a crap shoot.

Baseball is a little more random than other sports compared to the regular season but the regular season of MLB also isn't really a true indicator of how good a team is either. Too many call ups and trades happen that allow teams to improve over the season. In most other sports, you don't see that type of thing happen.

The bottom line though is that many people on this board use the randomness/crap shoot stuff as an excuse before the excuse is even needed. If the Cubs are the best team by a wide margin they should be expected to win the World Series.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93656
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
MUST.BE.BINARY
May be a poor choice to use this one right now when leash basically agreed with me. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Terry's Peeps wrote:
[116 wins in the regular season. 4 wins in the playoffs.

120 wins.


Thanks for explaining it to the lad, TP.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
This thread has morphed into a rerun. I give myself 11% of the blame.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bagels wrote:
MUST.BE.BINARY
May be a poor choice to use this one right now when leash basically agreed with me. :lol:


I don't, though. The difference is I'm comfortable saying the team who wins the World Series isn't necessarily the "best" team, but again, who cares? They played the best when it mattered and they are World Series champions. That's the only objective part of the entire discussion.

I am also comfortable saying that the World Series champion "won" the title (whether they are "best" or not) but that it is hard to project a World Series champion because of the level of randomness in the playoffs. It's not an excuse... it's just fact. I don't know why Cubs fans are expected to ignore facts because others think they are making excuses. Should they just ignore reality?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Kirkwood wrote:
2005 white sox


Yup.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93656
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't, though. The difference is I'm comfortable saying the team who wins the World Series isn't necessarily the "best" team, but again, who cares? They played the best when it mattered and they are World Series champions. That's the only objective part of the entire discussion.
My point is that the MLB playoffs aren't a crap shoot. You agree.

I know that the "best team" doesn't always win in any sport for a few different reasons.

Most of the time though, the champion is the best team, even if they weren't at all points in the season.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Hatchetman wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
[116 wins in the regular season. 4 wins in the playoffs.

120 wins.


Thanks for explaining it to the lad, TP.

So we will refer to the 2015 Chicago Cubs as a 100+ win baseball team?

The 2006 Cardinals didn't only win 83 games?

I know you're not a big sports fan Hatchetman, but when you talk about how many wins a team has, you're inherently referring to regular season wins.

The 72 win Bulls, for example.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Last edited by IMU on Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:52 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I don't, though. The difference is I'm comfortable saying the team who wins the World Series isn't necessarily the "best" team, but again, who cares? They played the best when it mattered and they are World Series champions. That's the only objective part of the entire discussion.
My point is that the MLB playoffs aren't a crap shoot. You agree.

I know that the "best team" doesn't always win in any sport for a few different reasons.

Most of the time though, the champion is the best team, even if they weren't at all points in the season.


I agree that they are not a complete crapshoot.

I do not agree that the champion is usually the "best" team... but they are the team that won the World Series, so to me, it doesn't matter. They have bragging rights, and no one can argue otherwise.

Do you agree that baseball playoffs are subject to more randomness than any other major sport?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
IMU wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
[116 wins in the regular season. 4 wins in the playoffs.

120 wins.


Thanks for explaining it to the lad, TP.

So we will refer to the 2015 Chicago Cubs as a 100+ win baseball team?


Go crazy.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93656
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Do you agree that baseball playoffs are subject to more randomness than any other major sport?
Well, I would phrase it that the MLB regular season does not reflect the best team as much as it does in other sports for the reasons I mentioned(more trades, more call ups, more variation in how good a team is as the season goes on).

The Cubs were third place last season in their own division but were trending up with young players some of which weren't even on the team. The Cardinals weren't better because they won a small amount more.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Most would agree 2003 was a choke.
Well, leash doesn't.


If 2003 wasn't a choke (not only within a game, but a series), then I don't know what is.

Don Nelson knows.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Don Tiny wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Most would agree 2003 was a choke.
Well, leash doesn't.


If 2003 wasn't a choke (not only within a game, but a series), then I don't know what is.

Don Nelson knows.

David Carradine knew


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Do you agree that baseball playoffs are subject to more randomness than any other major sport?
Well, I would phrase it that the MLB regular season does not reflect the best team as much as it does in other sports for the reasons I mentioned(more trades, more call ups, more variation in how good a team is as the season goes on).

The Cubs were third place last season in their own division but were trending up with young players some of which weren't even on the team. The Cardinals weren't better because they won a small amount more.


:lol: I'll admit - that's a nice way of re-phrasing. I disagree, but it's interesting. You're basically working backwards and saying that no matter what, the winner of the playoffs is the best team so the regular season isn't reflective of the best team. I could buy that on some levels, but not entirely.

I would look at it this way... if you were introduced to a random sport that you'd never seen before, and the way the "champion" of that sport was determined each year was determined first through a random elimination playoff series and then a 100+ game "season" which determined the winner by best record, would you still view it the same way? Would you still say that the team who performed best in the playoff series was the "best team"?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93656
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
I would look at it this way... if you were introduced to a random sport that you'd never seen before, and the way the "champion" of that sport was determined each year was determined first through a random elimination playoff series and then a 100+ game "season" which determined the winner by best record, would you still view it the same way? Would you still say that the team who performed best in the playoff series was the "best team"?
It would depend on the goal.

If every team showed up on day one of spring training with the goal of having the most regular season wins then that would be the best reflection of it. Right now, every team, even the Cubs, have the goal of winning the World Series.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
they play 162 games to make money not to figure out who the best team is.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hatchetman wrote:
they wild card games and divisional playoffs to make money not to figure out who the best team is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I would look at it this way... if you were introduced to a random sport that you'd never seen before, and the way the "champion" of that sport was determined each year was determined first through a random elimination playoff series and then a 100+ game "season" which determined the winner by best record, would you still view it the same way? Would you still say that the team who performed best in the playoff series was the "best team"?
It would depend on the goal.

If every team showed up on day one of spring training with the goal of having the most regular season wins then that would be the best reflection of it. Right now, every team, even the Cubs, have the goal of winning the World Series.


That's a reasonable take, but with the way the game of baseball is structured, I just struggle with it. It's a game that is based almost entirely on the law of large numbers and anomolies being worked out over time, and then the playoffs basically take that philosophy and throw it in a fire.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I have been blasting Theo's 5 year plan on here for 5 years!

So it's NOT OK to fail after 5 years (3 wasted)!!!!

At least win a pennant.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2016 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
Most would agree 2003 was a choke.
Well, leash doesn't.


If 2003 wasn't a choke (not only within a game, but a series), then I don't know what is.

Don Nelson knows.

David Carradine knew

Did you know they arrested the belt he used as an accessory to murder?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 149 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: USA and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group