It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 5:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Darkside wrote:
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
America wrote:
Also, its important to note that firearms are not necessarily an efficient way of killing people. Baseline odds of surviving a gunshot with first world trauma care are about 90%.

:lol:

This is a terrible post. The first sentence is unequivocally wrong and the second sentence is HIGHLY variable on where you got shot. Talk about banning guns annoys me too but you can do better for our side of the argument.

Or what you're getting shot with. But facts are facts, at least 80% of people who are admitted into ER's with gunshot wounds survive. If you make it to the hospital and you haven't been hit in the leg, heart, neck or head you've pretty much made it. Even if you are hit in those places your odds aren't as bad as you think.

He's right.

Not about the sentence I originally said was wrong.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:48 pm
Posts: 379
pizza_Place: Tortorice's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
If someone I know gets shot I'm going to tell them to stop whining it is no big deal.


Once had a bartender at Ethel's party (i think that's how it's spelled)
Show me and a buddy her bullet wound on her leg looked gnarly as fuck.

Off topic but still gnarly

_________________
I am the liquor Randy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
Not about the sentence I originally said was wrong.

But they aren't. In Afghanistan only 1 in every 250,000 rounds fired kills an insurgent, and there aren't many multi million hospitals staffed by trained trauma surgeons in Afghanistan to treat them.

Coalition troops are twice as likely to be killed by an IED than a gunshot (these are UK stats, I cant find US ones...I figure its probably close).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Dreadnaught847 wrote:


?? Was anyone saying that since there is a terror situation happening fairly often there are no longer racist killers still around.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 5:48 pm
Posts: 379
pizza_Place: Tortorice's
pittmike wrote:
Dreadnaught847 wrote:


?? Was anyone saying that since there is a terror situation happening fairly often there are no longer racist killers still around.


I'd consider racist killings another form of terrorism
If you don't to each their own

_________________
I am the liquor Randy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
America wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Not about the sentence I originally said was wrong.

But they aren't. In Afghanistan only 1 in every 250,000 rounds fired kills an insurgent, and there aren't many multi million hospitals staffed by trained trauma surgeons in Afghanistan to treat them.

Coalition troops are twice as likely to be killed by an IED than a gunshot (these are UK stats, I cant find US ones...I figure its probably close).

None of that is relevant, and let's stop talking about war scenarios. We are clearly talking about domestic policy here. There are a million factors that would affect those statistics, not just the efficiency to kill someone of a gun. If we were in the same room and I had a gun and wanted to kill you, you would be dead if you weren't armed. Same if you the scenario is reversed. It's really that simple. Your scenarios don't apply because not every single bullet is fired with the sole intention of killing, most people aren't trained or skilled shots, and a lot of victims won't get the chance to get trauma care before dying, and it also doesn't factor in getting shot several times for a no doubter murder.

Listen, I really don't feel like arguing with you on this since we're more or less on the same side. But saying a gun isn't an efficient way to kill someone is just a ridiculous statement. There's nothing more efficient in the hands of someone trained to use it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:36 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
The vast majority of people shot with a handgun survive.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Darkside wrote:
The vast majority of people shot with a handgun survive.

Yes. We've covered that. I guess you agree a gun isn't an efficient way to kill someone.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:38 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The most efficient way to kill a woman is to put her behind a steering wheel.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
The large majority of people in plane crashes survive too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The large majority of people in plane crashes survive too.


:lol: That seems unlikely to me but I assume there is a stat to show that it is true.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The large majority of people in plane crashes survive too.


:lol: That seems unlikely to me but I assume there is a stat to show that it is true.
95%.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
If a truck driver and a cop each have guns and try to kill eachother in a plane that is crashing, does either even die?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
If a truck driver and a cop each have guns and try to kill eachother in a plane that is crashing, does either even die?
:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:31 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
FavreFan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
The vast majority of people shot with a handgun survive.

Yes. We've covered that. I guess you agree a gun isn't an efficient way to kill someone.

Well how ridiculous do you want to make this?
In terms of lethality handguns aren't has lethal as rifles or shotguns. Not nearly as efficient.
And rifles and shotguns aren't as efficient as grenades.
Grenades aren't as efficient as mgs.
Mgs aren't as efficient as artillery.
Artillery isn't as efficient as napalm.

Of course a well placed handgun round can be lethal. So can a well placed knife slash. So can a well placed punch or kick to the nose.

I'm really not sure what your argument is.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Darkside wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
The vast majority of people shot with a handgun survive.

Yes. We've covered that. I guess you agree a gun isn't an efficient way to kill someone.

Well how ridiculous do you want to make this?
In terms of lethality handguns aren't has lethal as rifles or shotguns. Not nearly as efficient.
And rifles and shotguns aren't as efficient as grenades.
Grenades aren't as efficient as mgs.
Mgs aren't as efficient as artillery.
Artillery isn't as efficient as napalm.

Of course a well placed handgun round can be lethal. So can a well placed knife slash. So can a well placed punch or kick to the nose.

I'm really not sure what your argument is.

Well, you certainly did get ridiculous with it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:35 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Dude not really. When you're talking efficiency you have to view it in relative terms.
Handguns are not efficient at killing.
In a domestic scenario shotguns are rifles are significantly more efficient. It's really not even close.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I couldn't have been more clear about what "my argument" is. I'm not sure why you're having trouble comprehending it. A gun is an efficient tool to kill a person with. That's literally it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Darkside wrote:
Dude not really. When you're talking efficiency you have to view it in relative terms.
Handguns are not efficient at killing.
In a domestic scenario shotguns are rifles are significantly more efficient. It's really not even close.

Read America's original sentence I said was wrong. He said firearms. Not handguns.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11263
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
I'm really glad Lakemoorfest isn't anything like these threads.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
So why are we talking about gun control and not the ideology that encourages this?

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:41 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
FavreFan wrote:
I couldn't have been more clear about what "my argument" is. I'm not sure why you're having trouble comprehending it. A gun is an efficient tool to kill a person with. That's literally it.

Ok. Well, truth is that's not entirely true. I suppose it's a matter of semantics. Are you talking about efficiently killing one person? Many? With which type of handgun or round?
For example, if you were looking to kill as many people as you could in say a stadium, would a handgun or a pressure cooker with some ball bearings and gunpowder be more efficient? If you were looking to kill one person, would a rifle, shotgun or handgun be more efficient? With respect to deadly weapons, handguns are not terrible efficient. If you're comparing to handguns to knives or harsh language, handguns are more efficient.
The operator should also be taken into consideration. Most operators of handguns are not sufficiently qualified to make the as efficient or more efficient than other firearms or other methods of killing.
It's all relative and it cannot be accurately stated that handguns are an efficient means of killing.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Darkside wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
The vast majority of people shot with a handgun survive.

Yes. We've covered that. I guess you agree a gun isn't an efficient way to kill someone.

Well how ridiculous do you want to make this?
In terms of lethality handguns aren't has lethal as rifles or shotguns. Not nearly as efficient.
And rifles and shotguns aren't as efficient as grenades.
Grenades aren't as efficient as mgs.
Mgs aren't as efficient as artillery.
Artillery isn't as efficient as napalm.

Of course a well placed handgun round can be lethal. So can a well placed knife slash. So can a well placed punch or kick to the nose.

I'm really not sure what your argument is.

You left out nuclear bomb. A nuclear bomb is more efficient at killing someone than a handgun is. That's important to note when talking about gun control and gun violence.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
So why are we talking about gun control and not the ideology that encourages this?

Threads evolve.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Darkside wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I couldn't have been more clear about what "my argument" is. I'm not sure why you're having trouble comprehending it. A gun is an efficient tool to kill a person with. That's literally it.

Ok. Well, truth is that's not entirely true. I suppose it's a matter of semantics. Are you talking about efficiently killing one person? Many? With which type of handgun or round?
For example, if you were looking to kill as many people as you could in say a stadium, would a handgun or a pressure cooker with some ball bearings and gunpowder be more efficient? If you were looking to kill one person, would a rifle, shotgun or handgun be more efficient? With respect to deadly weapons, handguns are not terrible efficient. If you're comparing to handguns to knives or harsh language, handguns are more efficient.
The operator should also be taken into consideration. Most operators of handguns are not sufficiently qualified to make the as efficient or more efficient than other firearms or other methods of killing.
It's all relative and it cannot be accurately stated that handguns are an efficient means of killing.

Well, agree to disagree I guess. You and America are the first two people I've ever heard say that I think.

Ogie, I'll take it to a new thread.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:43 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The large majority of people in plane crashes survive too.


:lol: That seems unlikely to me but I assume there is a stat to show that it is true.
95%.
This is true, but these numbers are a little skewed. They consider what happened to the Michigan basketball team a "plane crash." If you are on a plane that is falling out of the sky, say your prayers.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13465
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
pittmike wrote:
I also do not have the stats but I am going to say indirect fire has a higher completion percentage.
"shots fired" at Mark Sanchez :alien:

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:45 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66053
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
FavreFan wrote:
You left out nuclear bomb. A nuclear bomb is more efficient at killing someone than a handgun is. That's important to note when talking about gun control and gun violence.

I think you get the idea dude. The point, which is quite obvious, is that it's a quite clear America is correct, firearms aren't terribly efficient. That's not to say they're not lethal, as they clearly are.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Darkside wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You left out nuclear bomb. A nuclear bomb is more efficient at killing someone than a handgun is. That's important to note when talking about gun control and gun violence.

I think you get the idea dude. The point, which is quite obvious, is that it's a quite clear America is correct, firearms aren't terribly efficient. That's not to say they're not lethal, as they clearly are.

:lol:
I really couldn't disagree more. Frankly, I think it's an insane opinion.

I'm curious to hear ToxicMasculinity's take on it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 23, 2017 8:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93636
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The large majority of people in plane crashes survive too.


:lol: That seems unlikely to me but I assume there is a stat to show that it is true.
95%.
This is true, but these numbers are a little skewed. They consider what happened to the Michigan basketball team a "plane crash." If you are on a plane that is falling out of the sky, say your prayers.
That doesn't really mean it is skewed though just like the numbers for deaths by gunshot include getting shot in your pinky.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 119 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group