It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 5:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
assuming he was already assaulted once and second time around he doesn't stop when commanded, time to shoot. Although you'd think he could've knee-capped him.

Takedown? what's that? a wrestling move? you want a 175 pounder to "takedown" a 300 pounder?
Tazer? we know (or at least have been told) they don't carry them.
Mace - possibly, if he had it.

The cop's biggest mistake was not immediately calling for reinforcements. Get the guy surrounded.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:25 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Seriously? Maybe im naive, but Im pretty sure Police are trained to stop someone a few different ways before just shooting them?


what, like Jedi mind tricks?

A takedown? Mace? Tazer?


Are you saying that a cop being charged has no options other than to shoot?


Of those three options, a Taser would be the only practical one in my opinion.

One of the other dads who had a son on my kid's baseball team is a cop and he brought his Taser to one of the games. I was surprised to learn that cops (at least in his district) are required to be Tasered themselves as part of the training, to give them an understanding of its effects. He said it was horrible.


And the reason that is done is so the cop understands that using it is a serious thing. We give them the benefit of the doubt that they already understand that shooting a person with bullets is serious. Apparently many of them don't. And some of the public agrees. Just kill a guy and chalk it up to "getting scum off the streets".

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
assuming he was already assaulted once and second time around he doesn't stop when commanded, time to shoot.



Are you serious? Do you think the same standard should apply to bouncers?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
the only other logical option at that point would be for the cop to turn tail and run like hell. probably a good idea in hindsight, but how many cops are going to do that? roughly none.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:32 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
the only other logical option at that point would be for the cop to turn tail and run like hell. probably a good idea in hindsight, but how many cops are going to do that? roughly none.


How about get back in his fucking car and call for backup?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
rogers park bryan wrote:

I think you guys are wrong or at the very least underselling the different options/tactics police have for stopping an unarmed suspect


You may be right...I'm just saying it depends on the actual circumstances. Being unarmed doesn't give you total immunity from being shot. There are clearly circumstances where you lose that immunity. Whether the circumstances here justify Wilson's actions, I don't know yet. I do think it is troubling though, in a George Zimmerman/Travon Martin way, that Wilson may have provoked or aggravated the situation prior to what may have led to justified force. To me, that is what may be causing much of the outrage.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
How about get back in his fucking car and call for backup?


like I said, probably the best idea in hindsight. don't know if this is what they teach in the academy. maybe it is (?)

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Id say the cops biggest mistake was shooting him 6 times..if its once, its not even a story.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
I think police forces largely lack proper training in approaching their jobs dispassionately. And I know it's hard to not take it personally when someone is motherfucking you, let alone shooting at you. But that's the job. Hitting a ninety mile an hour fastball is hard. Controlling air traffic around O'Hare is hard. A lot of jobs are hard.

For example if a guy makes an illegal right on red and refuses to stop when the cop puts his lights on behind him, the cop will without fail chase him through town at dangerous speeds, causing far more potential damage and/or injury than the original infraction. I think we should expect the cop to know when it isn't wise to do such a thing. We can't demand reason from criminals. But we sure have a right to demand it from cops.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Hitting a ninety mile an hour fastball is hard.


Dan Bernstein wrote:
Speak for yourself.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16490
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

For example if a guy makes an illegal right on red and refuses to stop when the cop puts his lights on behind him, the cop will without fail chase him through town at dangerous speeds, causing far more potential damage and/or injury than the original infraction. I think we should expect the cop to know when it isn't wise to do such a thing.


I tend to agree with this, but at a certain point the criminal will take advantage of this knowledge. You need to make them think you will chase/apprehend them. Or just put a red-light camera there. :) Just got busted for the first time with one of those...

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:51 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
leashyourkids wrote:
Presumed innocence is a legal concept, not a public opinion concept.


I think it was both of them at one time.

And with the social media tools at our disposal, public opinion is more than just opinion in our culture. People's minds are made up. And the facts really don't seem to matter. Because we don't currently have them.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hatchetman wrote:
assuming he was already assaulted once and second time around he doesn't stop when commanded, time to shoot. Although you'd think he could've knee-capped him.

Takedown? what's that? a wrestling move? you want a 175 pounder to "takedown" a 300 pounder?
Tazer? we know (or at least have been told) they don't carry them.
Mace - possibly, if he had it.

The cop's biggest mistake was not immediately calling for reinforcements. Get the guy surrounded.

Is this serious? What planet are we on? Do cops get trained only to deal with people their size or less?


Yes, a takedown. Yes, a tazer. Yes, mace. Yes, anything but shoot the kid 6 times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I think police forces largely lack proper training in approaching their jobs dispassionately..


you are probably on to something with the general point that standard police training and procedures and "culture" may not be the best way to fight crime. But changing that significantly does not seem probable.

Of course, New York has supposedly had great success with their "zero tolerance" brand of policing.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hatchetman wrote:
the only other logical option at that point would be for the cop to turn tail and run like hell. .

:lol:

So basically, cops are just people with guns. Either shoot or run like hell because that guy is big!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
How do we know that the guy didn't call for back up?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:55 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jaw Breaker wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That's what I don't get about this. A lot of people are saying let's wait til we get the facts. The FACT that he shot an unarmed man 6 times is enough to clearly demonstrate he is guilty of something.


The "facts" need clarification. It may be a "fact" that he shot Brown 6 times. But there are different ways someone can be shot 6 times. One way would be if he shot Brown in the back and head 6 times execution-style. Another way would be to say Brown charged toward Wilson and the officer started firing, hitting Brown 4 times in the arm (which didn't stop Brown), and then finally hit him critically with the last two shots.

Same thing with people repeating the fact that Brown was "unarmed." Technically true...but if someone fights with an officer for the officer's gun, he is no longer entitled to unarmed treatment in my opinion.

It could be that the officer is guilty...I don't know all the facts. My point is that even the facts can be twisted to be more inflammatory, depending on one's point of view.


Even if you believe the first 4 shots were legal because the officer feared for his life then a crime was committed with the last 2 shots. Why? Because he would have had to have been on his knees or falling over. At that point an unarmed man isn't a threat.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:22 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
That's what I don't get about this. A lot of people are saying let's wait til we get the facts. The FACT that he shot an unarmed man 6 times is enough to clearly demonstrate he is guilty of something.


The "facts" need clarification. It may be a "fact" that he shot Brown 6 times. But there are different ways someone can be shot 6 times. One way would be if he shot Brown in the back and head 6 times execution-style. Another way would be to say Brown charged toward Wilson and the officer started firing, hitting Brown 4 times in the arm (which didn't stop Brown), and then finally hit him critically with the last two shots.

Same thing with people repeating the fact that Brown was "unarmed." Technically true...but if someone fights with an officer for the officer's gun, he is no longer entitled to unarmed treatment in my opinion.

It could be that the officer is guilty...I don't know all the facts. My point is that even the facts can be twisted to be more inflammatory, depending on one's point of view.


Even if you believe the first 4 shots were legal because the officer feared for his life then a crime was committed with the last 2 shots. Why? Because he would have had to have been on his knees or falling over. At that point an unarmed man isn't a threat.



if you believe that the first four shots were legal, do the last two matter? And if so, why?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:26 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Because at that point he was no longer a threat. The officer couldn't have a reasonable fear of his safety. They were basically kill shots.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:30 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38373
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Because at that point he was no longer a threat. The officer couldn't have a reasonable fear of his safety. They were basically kill shots.


I don't think we are never going to know the sequence of shots and where they hit.

Do you trust Eric Holder to do a balanced investigation and arrive at what actually happened?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19045
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Seacrest wrote:
Nas wrote:
Because at that point he was no longer a threat. The officer couldn't have a reasonable fear of his safety. They were basically kill shots.


I don't think we are never going to know the sequence of shots and where they hit.

Do you trust Eric Holder to do a balanced investigation and arrive at what actually happened?


Sounds like you've already made up your mind.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 12:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I am fairly confident that the Feds will determine exactly the placement n sequence of each shot, including how far the deceased was from the shooter...forensics n ballistics are pretty damn accurate these days.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38705
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
SpiralStairs wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Nas wrote:
Because at that point he was no longer a threat. The officer couldn't have a reasonable fear of his safety. They were basically kill shots.


I don't think we are never going to know the sequence of shots and where they hit.

Do you trust Eric Holder to do a balanced investigation and arrive at what actually happened?


Sounds like you've already made up your mind.

Id say that about Holder too.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 1:15 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Seacrest wrote:
Nas wrote:
Because at that point he was no longer a threat. The officer couldn't have a reasonable fear of his safety. They were basically kill shots.


I don't think we are never going to know the sequence of shots and where they hit.

Do you trust Eric Holder to do a balanced investigation and arrive at what actually happened?


The guy who did the autopsy said in his opinion the final 2 shots had to have been the head shots. Everyone appears to have an agenda.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 2:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

For example if a guy makes an illegal right on red and refuses to stop when the cop puts his lights on behind him, the cop will without fail chase him through town at dangerous speeds, causing far more potential damage and/or injury than the original infraction. I think we should expect the cop to know when it isn't wise to do such a thing.


I tend to agree with this, but at a certain point the criminal will take advantage of this knowledge. You need to make them think you will chase/apprehend them. Or just put a red-light camera there. :) Just got busted for the first time with one of those...


Well, if a guy were actually "just doing his job" he could simply write down the license number of the car that refused to stop and go after the registered owner at a later time rather than endangering everyone on the street with a high speed chase. But it's always more than a job except when the cops want it to be "just doing their job". And refusing to stop for a cop becomes a personal affront that must be addressed immediately. The result of that lack of self-control might be a ridiculous chase through the streets as in my hypothetical example or it may be six shots fired at an unarmed man in anger because he told you to fuck off when you ordered him to get out of the street.

If you've ever read the Second City Cop blog, you know one of his mantras is "Police aren't above the law, but they aren't below it either." What he means is that cops should be held to the same standards as everyone else, a concept that is so wrong-headed, I don't know where to begin. A police force must be held to standards much higher than the criminals it has been hired to apprehend.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, if a guy were actually "just doing his job" he could simply write down the license number of the car that refused to stop and go after the registered owner at a later time rather than endangering everyone on the street with a high speed chase


that would never ever happen because
a) fleeing & eluding is a felony
b) not that i want to take the guilty until proven innocent tact, but someone pulled over for speeding that refuses to stop and engages the cops in a high speed chase, i'm going to take a wild guess that there's a reason they're doing it...i.e. outstanding warrants, drugs, guns, etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.1914982

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38705
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, if a guy were actually "just doing his job" he could simply write down the license number of the car that refused to stop and go after the registered owner at a later time rather than endangering everyone on the street with a high speed chase


that would never ever happen because
a) fleeing & eluding is a felony
b) not that i want to take the guilty until proven innocent tact, but someone pulled over for speeding that refuses to stop and engages the cops in a high speed chase, i'm going to take a wild guess that there's a reason they're doing it...i.e. outstanding warrants, drugs, guns, etc.

Then later on when that same car involved in a robbery, drive by, tbone accident that kills a young mom and her baby and it's found out that the police let them go earlier it'll be why didn't the cops stop them when they had the chance? fucking lazy donut eating scum .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:38 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, if a guy were actually "just doing his job" he could simply write down the license number of the car that refused to stop and go after the registered owner at a later time rather than endangering everyone on the street with a high speed chase


that would never ever happen because
a) fleeing & eluding is a felony
b) not that i want to take the guilty until proven innocent tact, but someone pulled over for speeding that refuses to stop and engages the cops in a high speed chase, i'm going to take a wild guess that there's a reason they're doing it...i.e. outstanding warrants, drugs, guns, etc.


But that's no reason to do something foolish. When cops run into trouble it's always due to poor judgment. And in their job, poor judgment can have far greater consequences than in yours or mine. Chasing a car through crowded streets is about ego as much as it's about apprehending a felon. And the same thing goes for shooting an unarmed guy because he told you to fuck off.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
badrogue17 wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Well, if a guy were actually "just doing his job" he could simply write down the license number of the car that refused to stop and go after the registered owner at a later time rather than endangering everyone on the street with a high speed chase


that would never ever happen because
a) fleeing & eluding is a felony
b) not that i want to take the guilty until proven innocent tact, but someone pulled over for speeding that refuses to stop and engages the cops in a high speed chase, i'm going to take a wild guess that there's a reason they're doing it...i.e. outstanding warrants, drugs, guns, etc.

Then later on when that same car involved in a robbery, drive by, tbone accident that kills a young mom and her baby and it's found out that the police let them go earlier it'll be why didn't the cops stop them when they had the chance? fucking lazy donut eating scum .


They're probably more likely to t-bone someone during a high speed chase.

I guess it depends on what you expect from your police department. It sounds like you would prefer them to err on the side of being a full-fledged military unit cracking down as hard as possible. Maybe that's what most people want. I don't know.

I certainly don't think it's a good idea to have police trained that the public is their enemy. I've heard cops that I know complaining about the C.A.P.S. program. They don't want to be part of their community. For most of them, that isn't why they signed up for the job. They did it for the power, to tell you what to do, and to crack your head if you don't.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group