Spaulding wrote:
These stories are much better than the ones about your flights.
I don't know if I'd want to go there. If not for your personal connection would you recommend it or recommend it over other places in Europe?
It isn't Rome, Paris or London, but what is? I won't even try to make that argument. I think it can stand tall with most of the rest of Europe in terms of interest (although I have a personal love of Spain). Prague was all the rage in Euro travel and might still be. It certainly matches Prague and exceeds what the rest of Czech and Slovakia have to offer. Switzerland has scenery but I like history with my scenery. I'd put it on the level of Germany in terms of travel destinations: historical significance, charming cities and beautiful nature experiences. Is it a must? Probably not but I'd rather go there than, say, Amsterdam to get baked, drink beer and see Anne Frank.
Everyone falls over themselves to go to Ireland. I understand, it is a place of origin for many and most of this dipshit country is afraid to go anywhere that doesn't speak English and offer a Chili's. I enjoy Ireland. Poland is superior in just about every respect as a tourist destination in my estimation.
My suggestion for Europe destinations:
1. London- get your feet wet on your first visit to Europe with something that is Europe but certainly nothing that will shock the system
2. Rome- this is THE spot but the pace and cultural barriers will have your head spinning on a first go
3. Paris- as wonderful as advertised but this isn't a city for kids so by your third visit to Europe, everyone will be old enough