It is currently Sun Feb 23, 2025 5:47 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30754
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I agree. I don't think what she did should be viewed as a criminal offense, but rather as a simple breach of trust in the workplace.
It does open up some issues with the concept of grooming younger kids and waiting for the acceptable time.

It's not hard for an adult to avoid a child until they are 18 though. Why can't we just accept that they should not get involved with them until 18?


They should not get involved with a student of any age. Students at a University are mostly over 18, yet if a Professor has a sexual relationship with a student, they are fired. Students are just off limits....period.

Thornton Melon would disagree.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This is dumb. Fire her and ban her from teaching again and let that be the end of it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 4:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I agree. I don't think what she did should be viewed as a criminal offense, but rather as a simple breach of trust in the workplace.
It does open up some issues with the concept of grooming younger kids and waiting for the acceptable time.

It's not hard for an adult to avoid a child until they are 18 though. Why can't we just accept that they should not get involved with them until 18?


They should not get involved with a student of any age. Students at a University are mostly over 18, yet if a Professor has a sexual relationship with a student, they are fired. Students are just off limits....period.

Thornton Melon would disagree.


Call me sometime when you have no class

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 6:10 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80533
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I agree. I don't think what she did should be viewed as a criminal offense, but rather as a simple breach of trust in the workplace.
It does open up some issues with the concept of grooming younger kids and waiting for the acceptable time.

It's not hard for an adult to avoid a child until they are 18 though. Why can't we just accept that they should not get involved with them until 18?


They should not get involved with a student of any age. Students at a University are mostly over 18, yet if a Professor has a sexual relationship with a student, they are fired. Students are just off limits....period.


:lol: :lol: Spoken like a man who has never set foot on a university campus in his life.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13465
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If a 17 year old Hank Scorpio could have bagged a hot 24 year old would you consider him a victim?

Clearly in that case the hot 24 year old is the victim.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13465
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
However, I think your whole point would now be reliant on you stating what would be a logical age of consent. 17 may or may not be the correct line to draw. However, it is the common line to draw it at 18 and it seems pretty fair to me. If that is the line that is drawn then adults need to deal with it.



Do you think the age of the adult matters? Is a 19 year old who has a relationship with a 17 year old different than a 50 year old having the same relationship?

Image

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If a 17 year old Hank Scorpio could have bagged a hot 24 year old would you consider him a victim?

Clearly in that case the hot 24 year old is the victim.


:lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't think they're alleging she even had sex with the student, rather touched his genitals "with intent to arouse and satisfy", whatever the hell that means. Can you recklessly or negligently give a handjob?

MANY would agree that, in most cases, if you're touching someone else's genitals for reasons other than "with intent to arouse and satisfy", that'd be worthy of being considered criminal.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If a 17 year old Hank Scorpio could have bagged a hot 24 year old would you consider him a victim?

Clearly in that case the hot 24 year old is the victim.

Well played sir. Well fucking played. :lol:

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Don Tiny wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I don't think they're alleging she even had sex with the student, rather touched his genitals "with intent to arouse and satisfy", whatever the hell that means. Can you recklessly or negligently give a handjob?

MANY would agree that, in most cases, if you're touching someone else's genitals for reasons other than "with intent to arouse and satisfy", that'd be worthy of being considered criminal.

The libertarians agree. Definitely infringing on that persons right not to get blue balls.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:28 pm
Posts: 6211
Location: Knoxville,Ill
pizza_Place: Caseys
I would tag that 24/7 rinse and repeat. Daily.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group