| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Did we really think long and hard about the new name? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=100746 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Beardown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Chicagofanatics.com Look, I know you guys were in a rush to put it up quickly after Big Fan's "D-Day". That's cool. I understand. But maybe we can do better. |
|
| Author: | Godfella [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Beardown wrote: Chicagofanatics.com Look, I know you guys were in a rush to put it up quickly after Big Fan's "D-Day". That's cool. I understand. But maybe we can do better. Not possible... sorry, Beardown. I worked hard on those logos... |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Godfella wrote: Beardown wrote: Chicagofanatics.com Look, I know you guys were in a rush to put it up quickly after Big Fan's "D-Day". That's cool. I understand. But maybe we can do better. Not possible... sorry, Beardown. I worked hard on those logos... What's the new logo? |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
It works |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
As far as branding don't you want something that might be in a google search? That's how Big Fan did it (Moment of silence...thank you). He had Redacted and 670thescore.com be the same thing. So when people googled the SCORE, it got them here. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
http://WWW.ChicagoBasementDwellers.com |
|
| Author: | TurdFerguson [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
ChicagoInfidels.com Maybe we get drinky to post some more. |
|
| Author: | Godfella [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Beardown wrote: Godfella wrote: Beardown wrote: Chicagofanatics.com Look, I know you guys were in a rush to put it up quickly after Big Fan's "D-Day". That's cool. I understand. But maybe we can do better. Not possible... sorry, Beardown. I worked hard on those logos... What's the new logo? It was just a joke... I posted some designs I created in the New Logo Thread. Hockey Gay is the leader in the clubhouse... |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
TurdFerguson wrote: ChicagoInfidels.com I think veganfan suggested that one. |
|
| Author: | Telegram Sam [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
A least JORR and Nas outvoted the inclusion of the word "religious." |
|
| Author: | Baby McNown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Beardown wrote: As far as branding don't you want something that might be in a google search? That's how Big Fan did it (Moment of silence...thank you). He had Redacted and 670thescore.com be the same thing. So when people googled the SCORE, it got them here. You can do the tags no matter what the name is. |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Baby McNown wrote: Beardown wrote: As far as branding don't you want something that might be in a google search? That's how Big Fan did it (Moment of silence...thank you). He had Redacted and 670thescore.com be the same thing. So when people googled the SCORE, it got them here. You can do the tags no matter what the name is. What's that suppose to mean? Is that another hint on the "ICE GIRL" Scandal. Just come out and say it!!!! Don't beat around the bush!!!! Whats' wrong with you? |
|
| Author: | Baby McNown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
It means, Beardown, that the search tags are completely different than what you name something. Tag it right and a Google search of "girl chained to furnace" could easily send the world rushing towards your profile. |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Baby McNown wrote: It means, Beardown, that the search tags are completely different than what you name something. Tag it right and a Google search of "girl chained to furnace" could easily send the world rushing towards your profile. Yes. I know. I was joking. Ya know, cracking wise. Funnin' around. Goofing on you. Got it? Cool. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 6:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Bears.com was taken. |
|
| Author: | Baby McNown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Beardown wrote: Baby McNown wrote: It means, Beardown, that the search tags are completely different than what you name something. Tag it right and a Google search of "girl chained to furnace" could easily send the world rushing towards your profile. Yes. I know. I was joking. Ya know, cracking wise. Funnin' around. Goofing on you. Got it? Cool. Need to make sure you are on your medication first 
|
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Baby McNown, would you be willing to do an "Ask Baby McNown" session in that "drinky thread" since you are in the know? |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
I love it. It's not hard to remember and it's catchy. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Yeah, I'm good with it. I was surprised it was available. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Beardown wrote: As far as branding don't you want something that might be in a google search? That's how Big Fan did it (Moment of silence...thank you). He had Redacted and 670thescore.com be the same thing. So when people googled the SCORE, it got them here. It isn't 1996 any longer. Websites can come up with search terms not found in the domain URL. tl;dr Shut your scrotum polisher. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Who the fuck is "we"? You got a turd in your pocket? |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
leashyourkids wrote: Who the fuck is "we"? You got a turd in your pocket? What's he supposed to carry it in, a purse? |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
If we were going to pick the most searchable terms, we'd have to name the board titspussyass . com |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
"Beardown's mp3 Sex Emporium" is really gonna have AltaVista working overtime! |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Curious Hair wrote: "Beardown's mp3 Sex Emporium" is really gonna have AltaVista working overtime! 
|
|
| Author: | Baby McNown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Beardown wrote: Baby McNown, would you be willing to do an "Ask Baby McNown" session in that "drinky thread" since you are in the know? You really think I'm going to say every detail that I know to the sewing circle? Bitch please. |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Baby McNown wrote: Beardown wrote: Baby McNown, would you be willing to do an "Ask Baby McNown" session in that "drinky thread" since you are in the know? You really think I'm going to say every detail that I know to the sewing circle? Bitch please. I can do a Jedi mind trick on you to make you do so. You won't even see it coming. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Why would anyone think Baby knows any real info about the drinky situation? |
|
| Author: | Baby McNown [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Beardown wrote: Baby McNown wrote: Beardown wrote: Baby McNown, would you be willing to do an "Ask Baby McNown" session in that "drinky thread" since you are in the know? You really think I'm going to say every detail that I know to the sewing circle? Bitch please. I can do a Jedi mind trick on you to make you do so. You won't even see it coming. These aren't the droids you're looking for. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Jun 06, 2016 8:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Did we really think long and hard about the new name? |
Bigfan had made at least one really good decision. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|