Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Poll: Who are you voting for?
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=101530
Page 1 of 2

Author:  leashyourkids [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Poll: Who are you voting for?

:king:

Author:  FavreFan [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Image

Author:  lipidquadcab [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Clinton...not thrilled about it...

Author:  Don Tiny [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Image

Author:  Nas [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 7:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

#HillaryKaine2016

Author:  Scooter [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Leash#letsgetshitrightthistime

Author:  Hussra [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

I plan on writing in President Elizabeth Warren in all three states I'm registered to vote in.

Author:  Darkside [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

I've voted 8n every election since my 18th. I can't in good conscious vote for either of these bozos.
I'd prefer to not vote for president. However... to those of us in illinois... your vote doesn't fucking matter anyway.

Author:  Hussra [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

in that case, use your vote to help keep 3rd parties viable:

Quote:
voting for third-party presidential candidates will help third parties reach the critical threshold of 5% of the popular vote — at which point they will qualify for public campaign funding assistance.

Author:  lipidquadcab [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Darkside wrote:
I've voted 8n every election since my 18th. I can't in good conscious vote for either of these bozos.
I'd prefer to not vote for president. However... to those of us in illinois... your vote doesn't fucking matter anyway.

Vote Saladin 2016: Make Iron Banner Great Again

Author:  Darkside [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

lipidquadcab wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I've voted 8n every election since my 18th. I can't in good conscious vote for either of these bozos.
I'd prefer to not vote for president. However... to those of us in illinois... your vote doesn't fucking matter anyway.

Vote Saladin 2016: Make Iron Banner Great Again

Let's see what you're made of.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

lipidquadcab wrote:
Vote Saladin 2016:

:?:
Image

Author:  lipidquadcab [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Darkside wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
Darkside wrote:
I've voted 8n every election since my 18th. I can't in good conscious vote for either of these bozos.
I'd prefer to not vote for president. However... to those of us in illinois... your vote doesn't fucking matter anyway.

Vote Saladin 2016: Make Iron Banner Great Again

Let's see what you're made of.

Image

Author:  Nas [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Just write in a vote for me

Author:  pittmike [ Fri Jul 22, 2016 9:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Why no "none" option?

Author:  casual fan [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 12:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

http://i.imgur.com/taNnPcO.jpg

Author:  newper [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 12:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Darkside wrote:
However... to those of us in illinois... your vote doesn't fucking matter anyway.

I've never voted until this primary. My wife was shocked, but this is the reason why -- it doesn't matter what you vote since the state is going to vote for Clinton.

That being said, I probably should have voted for local people.

Author:  FavreFan [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 1:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

I'm loving seeing my guy Gary Johnson leading this so far. We need to kill the two party system. I feel like I was close to getting Leash on board yesterday.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

FavreFan wrote:
I'm loving seeing my guy Gary Johnson leading this so far. We need to kill the two party system. I feel like I was close to getting Leash on board yesterday.


For a third party? I've always been on board for that. My third party just wouldn't be a Libertarian candidate, though I don't rule out voting for him this year. I don't align enough with the Green Party to vote Stein.

Author:  Walt Williams Neck [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

I have been voting since Nixon.....but since both parties have insulted my intelligence I will not vote for President. A vote for either Stein or Johnson is like a not voting at all....meaningless. The part I hate most is those who endorse the loser bitching about the winner for 4 fucking years :(

Author:  jimmypasta [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Image

Author:  Hussra [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 9:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Walt Williams Neck wrote:
I have been voting since Nixon.....but since both parties have insulted my intelligence I will not vote for President. A vote for either Stein or Johnson is like a not voting at all....meaningless. The part I hate most is those who endorse the loser bitching about the winner for 4 fucking years :(



3rd parties have long played the role of early/earliest adopters and pioneers in the nation's political conversation. e.g., Libertarian Party's national platform supported the legalization of marijuana as far back as 1988.

Look at the various reforms that happened in the first half of the last century: they were all bullet points from the Progressive Party's platform.

The Progressive Party was in effect an amalgamation of all the minor 3rd parties that sprung up in the late 19th century, mostly in the midwest. People's Party, Farmer-Labor Party, etc. These late 19th century Midwestern political movements, of course, inspired the Wizard of Oz. Silver slippers on a road of Gold leading to East Coast bankers/wizards, all metaphors for the currency dispute at the heart of many political beefs at the time.

Quote:
The Progressive Party's 1912 platform called for

Strict limits and disclosure requirements on political campaign contributions
Registration of lobbyists
Recording and publication of Congressional committee proceedings
In the social sphere the platform called for

A National Health Service to include all existing government medical agencies.
Social insurance, to provide for the elderly, the unemployed, and the disabled
Limited the ability of judges to order injunctions to limit labor strikes.
A minimum wage law for women
An eight-hour workday
A federal securities commission
Farm relief
Workers' compensation for work-related injuries
An inheritance tax
The political reforms proposed included

Women's suffrage
Direct election of Senators
Primary elections for state and federal nominations
The platform also urged states to adopt measures for "direct democracy", including:

The recall election (citizens may remove an elected official before the end of his term)
The referendum (citizens may decide on a law by popular vote)
The initiative (citizens may propose a law by petition and enact it by popular vote)
Judicial recall (when a court declares a law unconstitutional, the citizens may override that ruling by popular vote).[11]
Besides these measures, the platform called for reductions in the tariff, and limitations on naval armaments by international agreement.

The biggest controversy at the convention was over the platform section dealing with trusts and monopolies. The convention approved a strong "trust-busting" plank, but Perkins had it replaced with language that spoke only of "strong National regulation" and "permanent active [Federal] supervision" of major corporations. This retreat shocked reformers like Pinchot, who blamed it on Perkins. The result was a deep split in the new party that was never resolved.[12]

In general the platform expressed Roosevelt's "New Nationalism", An extension of his earlier philosophy of the Square Deal. He called for new restraints on the power of federal and state judges along with a strong executive to regulate industry, protect the working classes, and carry on great national projects. This New Nationalism was paternalistic, in direct contrast to Wilson's individualistic philosophy of "New Freedom". However one selected, Wilson's actual program resembled Roosevelt's ideas, apart from the notion of reining in judges.[13]

Roosevelt also favored a vigorous foreign policy, including strong military power. Though the platform called for limiting naval armaments, it also recommended the construction of two new battleships per year, much to the distress of outright pacifists such as Jane Addams.[14]


Green Party and Libertarian Party consolidated ranks, they could make some real noise.

Author:  Walt Williams Neck [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Hussra wrote:
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
I have been voting since Nixon.....but since both parties have insulted my intelligence I will not vote for President. A vote for either Stein or Johnson is like a not voting at all....meaningless. The part I hate most is those who endorse the loser bitching about the winner for 4 fucking years :(



3rd parties have long played the role of early/earliest adopters and pioneers in the nation's political conversation. e.g., Libertarian Party's national platform supported the legalization of marijuana as far back as 1988.

Look at the various reforms that happened in the first half of the last century: they were all bullet points from the Progressive Party's platform.

The Progressive Party was in effect an amalgamation of all the minor 3rd parties that sprung up in the late 19th century, mostly in the midwest. People's Party, Farmer-Labor Party, etc. These late 19th century Midwestern political movements, of course, inspired the Wizard of Oz. Silver slippers on a road of Gold leading to East Coast bankers/wizards, all metaphors for the currency dispute at the heart of many political beefs at the time.

Quote:
The Progressive Party's 1912 platform called for

Strict limits and disclosure requirements on political campaign contributions
Registration of lobbyists
Recording and publication of Congressional committee proceedings
In the social sphere the platform called for

A National Health Service to include all existing government medical agencies.
Social insurance, to provide for the elderly, the unemployed, and the disabled
Limited the ability of judges to order injunctions to limit labor strikes.
A minimum wage law for women
An eight-hour workday
A federal securities commission
Farm relief
Workers' compensation for work-related injuries
An inheritance tax
The political reforms proposed included

Women's suffrage
Direct election of Senators
Primary elections for state and federal nominations
The platform also urged states to adopt measures for "direct democracy", including:

The recall election (citizens may remove an elected official before the end of his term)
The referendum (citizens may decide on a law by popular vote)
The initiative (citizens may propose a law by petition and enact it by popular vote)
Judicial recall (when a court declares a law unconstitutional, the citizens may override that ruling by popular vote).[11]
Besides these measures, the platform called for reductions in the tariff, and limitations on naval armaments by international agreement.

The biggest controversy at the convention was over the platform section dealing with trusts and monopolies. The convention approved a strong "trust-busting" plank, but Perkins had it replaced with language that spoke only of "strong National regulation" and "permanent active [Federal] supervision" of major corporations. This retreat shocked reformers like Pinchot, who blamed it on Perkins. The result was a deep split in the new party that was never resolved.[12]

In general the platform expressed Roosevelt's "New Nationalism", An extension of his earlier philosophy of the Square Deal. He called for new restraints on the power of federal and state judges along with a strong executive to regulate industry, protect the working classes, and carry on great national projects. This New Nationalism was paternalistic, in direct contrast to Wilson's individualistic philosophy of "New Freedom". However one selected, Wilson's actual program resembled Roosevelt's ideas, apart from the notion of reining in judges.[13]

Roosevelt also favored a vigorous foreign policy, including strong military power. Though the platform called for limiting naval armaments, it also recommended the construction of two new battleships per year, much to the distress of outright pacifists such as Jane Addams.[14]


Green Party and Libertarian Party consolidated ranks, they could make some real noise.

Hello....it's 2016

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 1:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Image

Author:  Nas [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 1:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Image

Author:  Curious Hair [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 1:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Hussra wrote:
Green Party and Libertarian Party consolidated ranks, they could make some real noise.

Might not be as hard as it looks on paper considering folks on both sides tend to go in for pseudoscience as-seen-on-TV woo-woo bullshit. Call 'em the Supplement Party.

But I think we need to (and will) end up with a breakdown roughly similar to Canada's NDP-Liberal-Tory alignment, with social democrats, doves, and rural progressives forming a new populist party. The Democrats will be a pro-corporate, pro-war cult of personality for nice polite professionals, and the Republicans will be whatever right-wing nuts are still standing after the last of the big money goes to the Dems.

Author:  a retard [ Sat Jul 23, 2016 6:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Much as I dislike her, this is why I feel I must vote for Hillary.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... story.html

Author:  Curious Hair [ Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Let's be honest: Donald Trump is the worst presidential candidate since Mitt Romney.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Mon Jul 25, 2016 6:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

Feel the Johnson

Author:  Scorehead [ Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poll: Who are you voting for?

:D

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/