| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Khan Controversy https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=101671 |
Page 1 of 20 |
| Author: | Dignified Rube [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Khan Controversy |
When you allow yourself to be a pawn of the Clinton's by making a partisan attack against the Republican presidential candidate at the Democratic National Convention, you or the media cannot cry foul or say their cause is above politics when he responds against them. And what did he say that was so inflammatory? He made an observation that the wife wasn't allowed to say anything, because she had been silent during her husband's speech. How was Trump attacking Khan's religious freedom or equal protection under the law, as he charged Trump implicitly to have violated. He didn't. But the media jumped all over Trump because he said anything against the father and mother of a son who lost his life in Afghanistan eleven years ago, as if their standing was sacred. This was the Clintons' attempt to muddy the issue. Trump has not been against Muslim American soldiers or impugned their integrity; rather he has said he wants to protect America with his proposal to stop Muslims from coming into the country from countries that support terrorism. And it's the Islamic extremists that have been perpetrators of terrorism both here on 9/11, in Orlando and Fort Hood, and abroad in Paris, Nice, Munich and elsewhere. This is only common sense what Trump is proposing. Unfortunately, Americans are too stupid to understand the real truths about this political tactic by Clinton. They believe what the liberal media tells them with their distortions, obfuscations and otherwise false narratives. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
You didn't write this. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
DID. NOT. WRITE. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
He had the Genesis device . Should not have let his thirst for revenge cloud his judgement and just flown away |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Khantroversy |
|
| Author: | Dignified Rube [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Douchebag wrote: You didn't write this. Da, I did, comrade. |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 11:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
|
|
|
| Author: | JORR [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
|
|
| Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
"She had nothing to say," Trump said. "She probably ... maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say. You tell me." Trump is a pedophile, probably. Maybe he isn't, you tell me. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Douchebag wrote: You didn't write this. There are too many run-ons and things for this to be an actual article. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
It should be noted that the Republican establishment came out and killed Trump yesterday, too. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Good to see Rube come back full circle on his Trump support |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
RFDC wrote: Good to see Rube come back full circle on his Trump support 
|
|
| Author: | Jbi11s [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 12:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
|
|
| Author: | Phil Harris [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Just vote Gary Johnson. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 2:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Big Chicagoan wrote: Khantroversy This is the correct answer. For shame Rube. FOR SHAME. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 3:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
doug - evergreen park wrote: "She had nothing to say," Trump said. "She probably ... maybe she wasn't allowed to have anything to say. You tell me." Trump is a pedophile, probably. Maybe he isn't, you tell me.  As was Christie.....but this sailed over the political pundits here yesterday |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Is this a khanspiracy? |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
People digging on Senor Khan. Deleted his website. http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... migration/ |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Peoria Matt wrote: Is this a khanspiracy? 
|
|
| Author: | Brick [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
pittmike wrote: People digging on Senor Khan. Deleted his website. This seems to have been a mistake by him.http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... migration/ He had to know people would look into him and not like what they see either. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
I hope this thread doesn't devolve into khanstant unclever puns. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Eaglo Jeff wrote: This thread is becoming a HahnJob.
|
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Eaglo Jeff wrote: This thread is becoming a HahnJob.
|
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
FavreFan wrote: I hope this thread doesn't devolve into khanstant unclever puns. Maybe there will be a Khantest in this regard. |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Donald Trump wrote: I'd like to hear his Khant wife say something.
|
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: pittmike wrote: People digging on Senor Khan. Deleted his website. This seems to have been a mistake by him.http://www.breitbart.com/2016-president ... migration/ He had to know people would look into him and not like what they see either. Basic Khan job. |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
The khantinuous coverage of this story is tiresome. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Looks to be a very "Pro Sharia Law" type of guy. But, the damage is done, mission accomplished, Hillary get an agent of hers to "do the job." Wonder what position in a possible Hillary admin he will have? Or what gifts his law firm will be getting in the future....or maybe they will have to pay the Clinton Foundation Toll for that. What kind of disposable, soulless piece of shit would use a fallen soldier, someone's dead son as political bait? Holy Marconi shoe eating! |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Aug 02, 2016 4:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Khan Controversy |
Peoria Matt wrote: The khantinuous coverage of this story is tiresome. We have to expose the khan artist. |
|
| Page 1 of 20 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|