I'll go with Jigs & North
Followed by the Wally Phillips Show
Coppock on Sports
Chicago Ed at Night
Steve & Garry
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Rank Chicago's Radio Shows https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=102746 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
I've had new work hours the past week or so, so unfortunately I've sampled more Mully and Hanley in the last week then I have the last several years. With the decline of B&B, I've heard people mention M&H being possibly the best show now. That is decidedly not true. To me, they are still significantly worse than even Spiegel and Goff, which is pretty bad. At least have Spiegel and Goff have a personality, even if it's a bad one. I can't really rank M&H higher than Mike and Mike. It's that bad. 1. Boers and Bernstein* 2. Spiegel and Goff 3. All the mid day and afternoon ESPN1000 shows, I'm assuming. Literally never listen to that station after 9 am. 4. Laurence Holmes 5. Julie DiCaro shows on Saturday with the building janitor 6. Tie for last place between M&H and Mike and Mike. *show drops 5 spots in the ranking when Rozner fills in But yeah, all these shows are awful. The medium is fucked in this town. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
1. B&B 2. N/A There is no other radio show worth listening to in Chicago. Goff + replacement level host would be my #2 but we don't have that yet. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
1. Mully and Hanley Nothing else is worth listening. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
I don't listen to ESPN. 1. B & B 2. Mully & Hanley 3. LoHo 4. Hit & Run 5. Any weekend Bernstein wannabe 6. Goff & Spiegel |
|
| Author: | Killer V [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
leashyourkids wrote: I don't listen to ESPN. From M & M to Carmen to Kap to Waddle, they are trotting out the "Hall of Fame Smarmy" team. They're like Bernstein without the pointless yelling at callers. |
|
| Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
You forgot the Saturday Murph and Fred extravaganza. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 9:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
Killer V wrote: leashyourkids wrote: I don't listen to ESPN. From M & M to Carmen to Kap to Waddle, they are trotting out the "Hall of Fame Smarmy" team. They're like Bernstein without the pointless yelling at callers. ESPN's best host by far is J-Hood, and he has to suck a ton of dick just to get a few hours a week on the air. |
|
| Author: | Tall Midget [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
I think Holmes is currently the best guy on the Score by far, but that's due in part to the fact that everything else on the station is abysmal. I haven't listened to ESPN in quite a while, so I have nothing to report on that front. |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 10:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
Tall Midget wrote: I think Holmes is currently the best guy on the Score by far, but that's due in part to the fact that everything else on the station is abysmal. A "Tallest Midget" award, for sure. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 1:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
B&B is the only decent thing and more often than not, it sucks as well. Nothing on ESPN is good |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
1. Waddle & Silvy |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
I'll go with Jigs & North Followed by the Wally Phillips Show Coppock on Sports Chicago Ed at Night Steve & Garry |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 2:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
IMU wrote: 1. Waddle & Silvy I would put them at 1, with B&B at 2 (depending GREATLY on who is sitting in for B #1 on any given day). Hood and JD is my favorite pairing. Seems like they're together more when it's not football time. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
IMU wrote: 1. Waddle & Silvy /Thread |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
They all suck. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
sjboyd0137 wrote: They all suck. This. The only shows that I barely listen to are B and B, and Spiegel and Goff. Occasionally, I will listen to Les if I can't sleep. A few minutes of that show usually does the trick. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
Frank Coztansa wrote: IMU wrote: 1. Waddle & Silvy /Thread Some people like vanilla. Nothing wrong with that but they are vanilla covered in shit sauce. That makes things much worse. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
 Wrong. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
Hank Scorpio wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: IMU wrote: 1. Waddle & Silvy /Thread Some people like vanilla. Nothing wrong with that but they are vanilla covered in shit sauce. That makes things much worse. Yup. Waddle and Silvy is radio for folks who find Mully and Hanley to be too edgy. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
I enjoy intelligent sports discussions. Not edgy for the sake of being edgy. And I'm not sure saying dumb shit or shouting over callers should be considered edgy. |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
Eric and Kathy Roman and Stylez Steve Harvey |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
IMU wrote: I enjoy intelligent sports discussions. Not edgy for the sake of being edgy. And I'm not sure saying dumb shit or shouting over callers should be considered edgy. Let the record show IMU just quoted B&B in the Cubs thread!Another listener on the down low! |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
Did I?  Which part?
|
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 5:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
Roe Conn Brandmier Mancow |
|
| Author: | shakes [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 5:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
sjboyd0137 wrote: They all suck. This. If you're not listening to XM you should start immediately. Well worth whatever it costs considering the alternative. I haven't listened to AM radio in over 5 years and don't miss it one bit. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 5:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
IMU wrote: Did I? Which part?Wang whip. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 6:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: IMU wrote: Did I? Which part?Wang whip. Oh. Yeah, I see that used on the board a lot. Never questioned its origin. |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
1. Silvy & Twaddle 2. Kap & Co., Inc. 3. Jurko & Carm 4. Mike & Mike |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Oct 17, 2016 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rank Chicago's Radio Shows |
Silverman 1 Hood n Dickerson 2 The rest is garbage |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|