It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 2:01 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72569
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Took longer than I thought, but a lot of articles coming out today about vote tampering in swing states and such. Calls for Hillary to challenge the results or some shit. Just when I thought it was really all over.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 11:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
Took longer than I thought, but a lot of articles coming out today about vote tampering in swing states and such. Calls for Hillary to challenge the results or some shit. Just when I thought it was really all over.


I hope she doesn't but she will have about 3.5 to 4 million more votes than Trump once the final votes are counted. I know that doesn't really address your point but it is difficult to think about that aspect and realize she still lost.

I think she will accept the results and I think she should.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Took longer than I thought, but a lot of articles coming out today about vote tampering in swing states and such. Calls for Hillary to challenge the results or some shit. Just when I thought it was really all over.


I hope she doesn't but she will have about 3.5 to 4 million more votes than Trump once the final votes are counted. I know that doesn't really address your point but it is difficult to think about that aspect and realize she still lost.

I hope she accepts the results.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:29 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Took longer than I thought, but a lot of articles coming out today about vote tampering in swing states and such. Calls for Hillary to challenge the results or some shit. Just when I thought it was really all over.


I hope she doesn't but she will have about 3.5 to 4 million more votes than Trump once the final votes are counted. I know that doesn't really address your point but it is difficult to think about that aspect and realize she still lost.

I think she will accept the results and I think she should.



Yes, this is dangerous.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 13380
Location: The far western part of south east North Dakota
pizza_Place: Boboli
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Took longer than I thought, but a lot of articles coming out today about vote tampering in swing states and such. Calls for Hillary to challenge the results or some shit. Just when I thought it was really all over.


I hope she doesn't but she will have about 3.5 to 4 million more votes than Trump once the final votes are counted. I know that doesn't really address your point but it is difficult to think about that aspect and realize she still lost.

I think she will accept the results and I think she should.


The pitchforks and torches (and lawsuits) were being prepped in case of a Trump loss. Why should this be any different?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I smell a bit....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38041
Location: ...
that's what Republicans do. they steal. we just accept it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:34 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102665
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Hypothetical Hillary Clinton won the election!

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Hypothetical Hillary Clinton won the election!

:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:38 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



I had this discussion with a friend the other night. The concept of "one man, one vote" seems fair and reasonable on the surface, but is it really fair and reasonable to allow New York and California to have so much power over the rest of the country? And that's really why this conversation is happening now. The chosen candidate of the large cities and coastal elites lost the election under the rules as they are established in The Constitution. If it had gone the other way, I am near certain you would not be hearing this.

I'm guessing most Americans have no clue about how the process actually works.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



It's also hard to take someone seriously who doesn't.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



I had this discussion with a friend the other night. The concept of "one man, one vote" seems fair and reasonable on the surface, but is it really fair and reasonable to allow New York and California to have so much power over the rest of the country? And that's really why this conversation is happening now. The chosen candidate of the large cities and coastal elites lost the election under the rules as they are established in The Constitution. If it had gone the other way, I am near certain you would not be hearing this.

I'm guessing most Americans have no clue about how the process actually works.



Huh? Trump basically stated if he lost the system must be rigged.

Bernie Sanders threatened to challenge the results even after losing.

I actually think that Hillary Clinton will accept the results even if it is found that there this some impropriety. No doubt in my mind it would be different if it were the other two. Their supporters would also be raising holy hell too.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Hillary lost and no one will care anymore by Jan 20 or so.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



It's also hard to take someone seriously who doesn't.
What if someone cited "Total states won"? Does that matter?

The way the system is setup neither candidate should be going for the popular vote. It's nice to get it but it means nothing. Every campaign stop would be completely different if they were going for the popular vote for both candidates.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
pittmike wrote:
Hillary lost and no one will care anymore by Jan 20 or so.



It won't take til Jan. 20. Most have aleady moved on. Trump is President and people want to see what he will do. I'm not optimistic but maybe I will be wrong.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



It's also hard to take someone seriously who doesn't.
What if someone cited "Total states won"? Does that matter?

The way the system is setup neither candidate should be going for the popular vote. It's nice to get it but it means nothing. Every campaign stop would be completely different if they were going for the popular vote for both candidates.


This issue is really not about popular vote. I already stated that so I don'the know why you're focusing on that aspect and not the "real issue".

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93640
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
This issue is really not about popular vote. I already stated that so I don'the know why you're focusing on that aspect and not the "real issue".
I'm focusing on it because you brought it up! :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
This issue is really not about popular vote. I already stated that so I don'the know why you're focusing on that aspect and not the "real issue".
I'm focusing on it because you brought it up! :lol:



I also stated that it is not related to the "real issue". However if you factor in the fact that she will have amassed 4 million votes more than him and this latest thing which may tip the scales in her favor it might be something to contest over.

I hope she doesn't. You are the same guy though that kept pushing Emails long after it had been litigated. Who you Crappin dude?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32164
pizza_Place: Milano's
what if it turns out the tampering was done by Russia


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



I had this discussion with a friend the other night. The concept of "one man, one vote" seems fair and reasonable on the surface, but is it really fair and reasonable to allow New York and California to have so much power over the rest of the country? And that's really why this conversation is happening now. The chosen candidate of the large cities and coastal elites lost the election under the rules as they are established in The Constitution. If it had gone the other way, I am near certain you would not be hearing this.

I'm guessing most Americans have no clue about how the process actually works.



Huh? Trump basically stated if he lost the system must be rigged.

Bernie Sanders threatened to challenge the results even after losing.

I actually think that Hillary Clinton will accept the results even if it is found that there this some impropriety. No doubt in my mind it would be different if it were the other two. Their supporters would also be raising holy hell too.


When your opponent is getting the debate questions in advance from CNN, aren't you entitled to say shit is rigged?

How about when your own party is trying to undermine your campaign at every turn? Is that "rigging"?

I agree that Clinton will accept the results, just as I believe Trump or Sanders would have.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



I had this discussion with a friend the other night. The concept of "one man, one vote" seems fair and reasonable on the surface, but is it really fair and reasonable to allow New York and California to have so much power over the rest of the country? And that's really why this conversation is happening now. The chosen candidate of the large cities and coastal elites lost the election under the rules as they are established in The Constitution. If it had gone the other way, I am near certain you would not be hearing this.

I'm guessing most Americans have no clue about how the process actually works.



Huh? Trump basically stated if he lost the system must be rigged.

Bernie Sanders threatened to challenge the results even after losing.

I actually think that Hillary Clinton will accept the results even if it is found that there this some impropriety. No doubt in my mind it would be different if it were the other two. Their supporters would also be raising holy hell too.


When your opponent is getting the debate questions in advance from CNN, aren't you entitled to say shit is rigged?

How about when your own party is trying to undermine your campaign at every turn? Is that "rigging"?

I agree that Clinton will accept the results, just as I believe Trump or Sanders would have.


When The FBI makes a baseless allegation 2 weeks before the election isn't that an example of the system being rigged? When they leak information to a biased right wing network 2 weeks before about possible indictments coming down regarding the Clinton foundation which are without merit, isnt that an example of the system being rigged? When you have a media site which purports to be interested in the truth but only leaks information from one side isn't that an example of the system being rigged?

In this particular instance regarding the computer scientists this could be an actual rigging of the system and I am saying that she should simply move on


It is so obvious the bias that some of you have regarding Hillary Clinton. You would have thought she killed your dog or something. She lost and the vast majority of her supporters have accepted it at this point. If they have apprehension about a Trump presidency they should. He is a divisive figure mired in corruption. He also doesn't know anything about running government and is totally ignorant about the nation's laws. People on this board can cavalierly dismiss it as no big if they choose but that doesn't mean that "other" people have to.

It's not liberal bias to be concerned about him being President either. I had concerns about Obama 8 yrs ago and he was not nearly as divisive or threatening as Trump.


And in Sanders case he wasn't a member of the party. He became a Democrat to run for President. May have been the reason that they didn't care for him. He also spent a great portion of his career dissing Democrats as he is doing now. The notion that they owe him anything is false.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80536
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



I had this discussion with a friend the other night. The concept of "one man, one vote" seems fair and reasonable on the surface, but is it really fair and reasonable to allow New York and California to have so much power over the rest of the country? And that's really why this conversation is happening now. The chosen candidate of the large cities and coastal elites lost the election under the rules as they are established in The Constitution. If it had gone the other way, I am near certain you would not be hearing this.

I'm guessing most Americans have no clue about how the process actually works.



Huh? Trump basically stated if he lost the system must be rigged.

Bernie Sanders threatened to challenge the results even after losing.

I actually think that Hillary Clinton will accept the results even if it is found that there this some impropriety. No doubt in my mind it would be different if it were the other two. Their supporters would also be raising holy hell too.


When your opponent is getting the debate questions in advance from CNN, aren't you entitled to say shit is rigged?

How about when your own party is trying to undermine your campaign at every turn? Is that "rigging"?

I agree that Clinton will accept the results, just as I believe Trump or Sanders would have.


When The FBI makes a baseless allegation 2 weeks before the election isn't that an example of the system being rigged? When they leak information to a biased right wing network 2 weeks before about possible indictments coming down regarding the Clinton foundation which are without merit, isnt that an example of the system being rigged? When you have a media site which purports to be interested in the truth but only leaks information from one side isn't that an example of the system being rigged?

In this particular instance regarding the computer scientists this could be an actual rigging of the system and I am saying that she should simply move on


It is so obvious the bias that some of you have regarding Hillary Clinton. You would have thought she killed your dog or something. She lost and the vast majority of her supporters have accepted it at this point. If they have apprehension about a Trump presidency they should. He is a divisive figure mired in corruption. He also doesn't know anything about running government and is totally ignorant about the nation's laws. People on this board can cavalierly dismiss it as no big if they choose but that doesn't mean that "other" people have to.

It's not liberal bias to be concerned about him being President either. I had concerns about Obama 8 yrs ago and he was not nearly as divisive or threatening as Trump


The FBI made no allegations, baseless or otherwise. Comey simply advised Congress that the investigation had been reopened.

On the one hand the Clinton camp kept insisting America didn't care about her server, but when she loses suddenly that's the reason.

_________________
Freedom is our Strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



I had this discussion with a friend the other night. The concept of "one man, one vote" seems fair and reasonable on the surface, but is it really fair and reasonable to allow New York and California to have so much power over the rest of the country? And that's really why this conversation is happening now. The chosen candidate of the large cities and coastal elites lost the election under the rules as they are established in The Constitution. If it had gone the other way, I am near certain you would not be hearing this.

I'm guessing most Americans have no clue about how the process actually works.



Huh? Trump basically stated if he lost the system must be rigged.

Bernie Sanders threatened to challenge the results even after losing.

I actually think that Hillary Clinton will accept the results even if it is found that there this some impropriety. No doubt in my mind it would be different if it were the other two. Their supporters would also be raising holy hell too.


When your opponent is getting the debate questions in advance from CNN, aren't you entitled to say shit is rigged?

How about when your own party is trying to undermine your campaign at every turn? Is that "rigging"?

I agree that Clinton will accept the results, just as I believe Trump or Sanders would have.


When The FBI makes a baseless allegation 2 weeks before the election isn't that an example of the system being rigged? When they leak information to a biased right wing network 2 weeks before about possible indictments coming down regarding the Clinton foundation which are without merit, isnt that an example of the system being rigged? When you have a media site which purports to be interested in the truth but only leaks information from one side isn't that an example of the system being rigged?

In this particular instance regarding the computer scientists this could be an actual rigging of the system and I am saying that she should simply move on


It is so obvious the bias that some of you have regarding Hillary Clinton. You would have thought she killed your dog or something. She lost and the vast majority of her supporters have accepted it at this point. If they have apprehension about a Trump presidency they should. He is a divisive figure mired in corruption. He also doesn't know anything about running government and is totally ignorant about the nation's laws. People on this board can cavalierly dismiss it as no big if they choose but that doesn't mean that "other" people have to.

It's not liberal bias to be concerned about him being President either. I had concerns about Obama 8 yrs ago and he was not nearly as divisive or threatening as Trump


The FBI made no allegations, baseless or otherwise. Comey simply advised Congress that the investigation had been reopened.

On the one hand the Clinton camp kept insisting America didn't care about her server, but when she loses suddenly that's the reason.



I don't think that is the reason either but it has much more validity than the stuff involving Trump or Sanders.

What Comey did was much more impactful and I'd never say she lost because of that.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
wouldn't be too hard to outsmart people in Wisconsin or western Pennsylvania.

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40942
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's hard to take anyone seriously who mentions the popular vote. It's like mentioning that you gained more yards in a football game or you had more hits in a baseball game.



I had this discussion with a friend the other night. The concept of "one man, one vote" seems fair and reasonable on the surface, but is it really fair and reasonable to allow New York and California to have so much power over the rest of the country? And that's really why this conversation is happening now. The chosen candidate of the large cities and coastal elites lost the election under the rules as they are established in The Constitution. If it had gone the other way, I am near certain you would not be hearing this.

I'm guessing most Americans have no clue about how the process actually works.



Huh? Trump basically stated if he lost the system must be rigged.

Bernie Sanders threatened to challenge the results even after losing.

I actually think that Hillary Clinton will accept the results even if it is found that there this some impropriety. No doubt in my mind it would be different if it were the other two. Their supporters would also be raising holy hell too.


When your opponent is getting the debate questions in advance from CNN, aren't you entitled to say shit is rigged?

How about when your own party is trying to undermine your campaign at every turn? Is that "rigging"?

I agree that Clinton will accept the results, just as I believe Trump or Sanders would have.


When The FBI makes a baseless allegation 2 weeks before the election isn't that an example of the system being rigged? When they leak information to a biased right wing network 2 weeks before about possible indictments coming down regarding the Clinton foundation which are without merit, isnt that an example of the system being rigged? When you have a media site which purports to be interested in the truth but only leaks information from one side isn't that an example of the system being rigged?

In this particular instance regarding the computer scientists this could be an actual rigging of the system and I am saying that she should simply move on


It is so obvious the bias that some of you have regarding Hillary Clinton. You would have thought she killed your dog or something. She lost and the vast majority of her supporters have accepted it at this point. If they have apprehension about a Trump presidency they should. He is a divisive figure mired in corruption. He also doesn't know anything about running government and is totally ignorant about the nation's laws. People on this board can cavalierly dismiss it as no big if they choose but that doesn't mean that "other" people have to.

It's not liberal bias to be concerned about him being President either. I had concerns about Obama 8 yrs ago and he was not nearly as divisive or threatening as Trump


The FBI made no allegations, baseless or otherwise. Comey simply advised Congress that the investigation had been reopened.

On the one hand the Clinton camp kept insisting America didn't care about her server, but when she loses suddenly that's the reason.


Looks like LTG can play equivalency theater as well as others.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:26 pm
Posts: 3351
Location: Far East 'burbs.
pizza_Place: Pasaro's, St. Joe, MI.
I have no doubt that there was election tampering. Both ways. Was it enough to change the outcome, I doubt it. IF it can be made better, by all means, let's make it better.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
These elections are rigged. Only rich oligarchs win. If Hilary would have won some people would have higher taxes, and it's likely more brown people would have been bombed. But let's not think she was some change agent.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
It's like the card game in The Sting. Paul Newman cheated better than Lonigan.

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
These elections are rigged. Only rich oligarchs win. If Hilary would have won some people would have higher taxes, and it's likely more brown people would have been bombed. But let's not think she was some change agent.


The system prevents change more than anything. They make it hard for legislation to get passed and then everything screams about there being no change.

Unless you can effectively work with other side nothing will get done. Unfortunately when you do that you are criticized for selling out the party. People need to be honest about the role played by everyone in this. There are differences but people are unwilling to compromise and that is ultimately what the system is built upon.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Stolen Election?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2016 9:52 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Greg Palast was predicting the presidency would be stolen a couple months before the election took place: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/the-gops-stealth-war-against-voters-w435890.

This is Palast's preliminary report on the 2016 results: http://www.gregpalast.com/election-stolen-heres/.

Fascinating stuff.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 206 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group