He smacked a woman.

He's a pussy.

He smacked a woman.

He's a pussy.

I have a hard time telling someone on the receiving end of two instances of battery to simply walk away and not make the perpetrator stop bettering them.

And despite what MANY are saying, the force used was not disproportionate or inappropriate: the law recognizes the need to "meet force with force" in self-defense and in Oklahoma there is no duty to retreat. The law isn't concerned with how much force was used relative to on whom it was applied, it only cares whether the belief that said force was necessary to end the threat of bodily harm or death was reasonable.

I think after getting pushed in the chest and slapped in the face, the belief that a punch to the face is sufficient to end the threat is a reasonable one.

That's his first reaction from a woman's open handed slap? What a giant coward. I could maybe, almost, possibly understand if this woman came at him with a Manny Paquiao in his prime combo to the dome, but his reaction speaks to anger issues which have hopefully since been resolved.

https://youtu.be/fCgvYyZ16iU?t=25s

He's being sued in federal court by the woman he punched, who is oddly enough being referred to as the "victim", despite appearing to instigate and escalate the situation to include hand-to-face violence.

What say ye?

I have a hard time telling someone on the receiving end of two instances of battery to simply walk away and not make the perpetrator stop bettering them.

And despite what MANY are saying, the force used was not disproportionate or inappropriate: the law recognizes the need to "meet force with force" in self-defense and in Oklahoma there is no duty to retreat. The law isn't concerned with how much force was used relative to on whom it was applied, it only cares whether the belief that said force was necessary to end the threat of bodily harm or death was reasonable.

I think after getting pushed in the chest and slapped in the face, the belief that a punch to the face is sufficient to end the threat is a reasonable one.

I have a hard time telling someone on the receiving end of two instances of battery to simply walk away and not make the perpetrator stop bettering them.

And despite what MANY are saying, the force used was not disproportionate or inappropriate: the law recognizes the need to "meet force with force" in self-defense and in Oklahoma there is no duty to retreat. The law isn't concerned with how much force was used relative to on whom it was applied, it only cares whether the belief that said force was necessary to end the threat of bodily harm or death was reasonable.

I think after getting pushed in the chest and slapped in the face, the belief that a punch to the face is sufficient to end the threat is a reasonable one.

He wasn't under any significant threat.

That's his first reaction from a woman's open handed slap? What a giant coward. I could maybe, almost, possibly understand if this woman came at him with a Manny Paquiao in his prime combo to the dome, but his reaction speaks to anger issues which have hopefully since been resolved.

Joe Mixon

At what point is it okay to use physical force?

Ideally, he wouldn't have knocked her the fuck out, but I'd like to ask my good friends who are calling him a piece of shit... What would you have done? Run away? What if she follows? At what point is it okay to use physical force?

Motherfucking Diamond Cutter through the table.


Incidentally this is practically a shot for shot copy of the Leash v IMU scrap at John's.

That's what I want to know, and for the moment I'll forget that if this was a dude that just open-handed slapped Joe Mixon, people would be laughing at his lawsuit attempt and wondering why Mixon was even charged with a crime.

But let's say that instead of an open-handed slap from her, it's a punch. It's still weak, relatively speaking, but it's a closed-fist punch at Joe Mixon's head/neck area, and he responds as we saw in the video...is that acceptable then? Because at some point, you're telling this dude that he can only protect himself from harm (a punch is harmful even if it comes from someone comparatively weaker than you) if there is a blunt-force weapon (or worse) involved, and that's just crazy talk.

Incidentally this is practically a shot for shot copy of the Leash v IMU scrap at John's.