Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=104483 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 11:33 am ] |
Post subject: | 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Does Trump's election signal the end or decline of religion in public life? Typically you have candidates from both parties pay lip service to the place of religion in their personal lives, and within the past 25 years or so it's generally been the republican candidates being more vocal and demonstrative than their democratic counterparts. Obviously the 2015-16 primary process shattered that norm with republican voters ignoring a slew of more outwardly religious candidates (Carson, Cruz, Huckabee, etc.) in order to nominate possibly the most irreligious candidate ever. Will Trump's election have any affect on future debates over the role of religion in public life? Typically the election of the republican candidate is celebrated by more religious voters and passive religious observers, but this time around those same folks are going to find it difficult to reconcile their religious views with the conduct and character of the republican president. Does this now mean that you have a path to the White House as a republican that doesn't involve being as outwardly religious as previous nominees? Also, does Trump as POTUS mean the longstanding debate about the role of religion in public life is now sidelined because Trump cannot be a serious/credible voice for those who tend to be in favor of religious symbolism/presence/etc. in politics and society? |
Author: | RFDC [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 11:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
man every time I read a post from you it causes me to freak for a min thinking Biggie is back |
Author: | Chus [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
RFDC wrote: man every time I read a post from you it causes me to freak for a min thinking Biggie is back Until you realize the spelling and grammar are above eighth grade level. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
RFDC wrote: man every time I read a post from you it causes me to freak for a min thinking Biggie is back Me too. FF picked a great avatar for vegan. To answer the question, no it's not over. No more than racism was over when Obama became president. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 1:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
RFDC wrote: man every time I read a post from you it causes me to freak for a min thinking Biggie is back me too. When I read threads to see what I've posted I usually skip past my own posts because I think they're from BF. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 1:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
It seemed like a great avatar suggestion at the time ... I'm starting to regret my decision ... it's humorously unsettling. I think we'll hear more out of folks who are obnoxious assholes about their beliefs and/or how those who disagree are terrible people (or whatever). |
Author: | Rod [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 1:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
veganfan21 wrote: Does Trump's election signal the end or decline of religion in public life? Typically you have candidates from both parties pay lip service to the place of religion in their personal lives, and within the past 25 years or so it's generally been the republican candidates being more vocal and demonstrative than their democratic counterparts. Obviously the 2015-16 primary process shattered that norm with republican voters ignoring a slew of more outwardly religious candidates (Carson, Cruz, Huckabee, etc.) in order to nominate possibly the most irreligious candidate ever. Will Trump's election have any affect on future debates over the role of religion in public life? Typically the election of the republican candidate is celebrated by more religious voters and passive religious observers, but this time around those same folks are going to find it difficult to reconcile their religious views with the conduct and character of the republican president. Does this now mean that you have a path to the White House as a republican that doesn't involve being as outwardly religious as previous nominees? Also, does Trump as POTUS mean the longstanding debate about the role of religion in public life is now sidelined because Trump cannot be a serious/credible voice for those who tend to be in favor of religious symbolism/presence/etc. in politics and society? I don't think so. You still have the influence of Pence. And Trump had to nod to the wacky evangelicals to get elected as a Republican. For example, I don't think Trump personally gives a fuck about abortion, but he probably couldn't get nominated as a pro-choice Republican or even as a guy who just avoided the issue all together. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 1:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Does Trump's election signal the end or decline of religion in public life? Typically you have candidates from both parties pay lip service to the place of religion in their personal lives, and within the past 25 years or so it's generally been the republican candidates being more vocal and demonstrative than their democratic counterparts. Obviously the 2015-16 primary process shattered that norm with republican voters ignoring a slew of more outwardly religious candidates (Carson, Cruz, Huckabee, etc.) in order to nominate possibly the most irreligious candidate ever. Will Trump's election have any affect on future debates over the role of religion in public life? Typically the election of the republican candidate is celebrated by more religious voters and passive religious observers, but this time around those same folks are going to find it difficult to reconcile their religious views with the conduct and character of the republican president. Does this now mean that you have a path to the White House as a republican that doesn't involve being as outwardly religious as previous nominees? Also, does Trump as POTUS mean the longstanding debate about the role of religion in public life is now sidelined because Trump cannot be a serious/credible voice for those who tend to be in favor of religious symbolism/presence/etc. in politics and society? I don't think so. You still have the influence of Pence. And Trump had to nod to the wacky evangelicals to get elected as a Republican. For example, I don't think Trump personally gives a fuck about abortion, but he probably couldn't get nominated as a pro-choice Republican or even as a guy who just avoided the issue all together. There's no way to know but I think he could have got elected if he avoided it. There's a sort of cult of personality following here that totally upended what we normally think about campaigns. In the end I suppose I am overstating things because his voter numbers, when looked at against history, aren't that impressive. |
Author: | Drake LaRrieta [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 1:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
The vast majority of Evangelicals voted for Trump, at least the ones who understood that Hillary Clinton could ruin the Supreme Court forever. |
Author: | Nas [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 1:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
veganfan21 wrote: Does Trump's election signal the end or decline of religion in public life? Typically you have candidates from both parties pay lip service to the place of religion in their personal lives, and within the past 25 years or so it's generally been the republican candidates being more vocal and demonstrative than their democratic counterparts. Obviously the 2015-16 primary process shattered that norm with republican voters ignoring a slew of more outwardly religious candidates (Carson, Cruz, Huckabee, etc.) in order to nominate possibly the most irreligious candidate ever. Will Trump's election have any affect on future debates over the role of religion in public life? Typically the election of the republican candidate is celebrated by more religious voters and passive religious observers, but this time around those same folks are going to find it difficult to reconcile their religious views with the conduct and character of the republican president. Does this now mean that you have a path to the White House as a republican that doesn't involve being as outwardly religious as previous nominees? Also, does Trump as POTUS mean the longstanding debate about the role of religion in public life is now sidelined because Trump cannot be a serious/credible voice for those who tend to be in favor of religious symbolism/presence/etc. in politics and society? If he is successful the answer is yes |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
When an openly atheist candidate makes a deep run in either party's nomination process, maybe. Hell, I'd settle for an openly atheist politician winning a seat in Congress (that is, winning after they spout atheist views, not after 35 years as a beard [by cracky]). |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 2:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
It has been declining, I'm sure it will continue to do so. How many millennials you know go to church? |
Author: | Drake LaRrieta [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Hatchetman wrote: It has been declining, I'm sure it will continue to do so. How many millennials you know go to church? You are right about the millenials and going to church. However, my impression is that most millenials don't even vote. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Drake LaRrieta wrote: The vast majority of Evangelicals voted for Trump, at least the ones who understood that Hillary Clinton could ruin the Supreme Court forever. There's probably going to be a lot of mental gymnastics during sermons across the country over the next four years in trying to justify that. |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Missing Commandments: - Grab em by the pussy - Get em to pee on each other |
Author: | Drake LaRrieta [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
veganfan21 wrote: Drake LaRrieta wrote: The vast majority of Evangelicals voted for Trump, at least the ones who understood that Hillary Clinton could ruin the Supreme Court forever. There's probably going to be a lot of mental gymnastics during sermons across the country over the next four years in trying to justify that. Churches generally do not preach political sermons as some believe that pastors should not preach anything partisan from their pulpits because the churches are funded by tax deductible funds. So a political sermon would be more in terms of discussing a topic according to what the Bible teaches on a subject rather than the views of a political party. The left wing people have fake moral outrage. They don't believe in absolutes until they see someone like Trump who they believe threatens their liberal utopia. So it's like saying you don't believe in the devil, but then Trump comes along and you can't vote for him because he is "the devil." |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Drake LaRrieta wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Drake LaRrieta wrote: The vast majority of Evangelicals voted for Trump, at least the ones who understood that Hillary Clinton could ruin the Supreme Court forever. There's probably going to be a lot of mental gymnastics during sermons across the country over the next four years in trying to justify that. Churches generally do not preach political sermons as some believe that pastors should not preach anything partisan from their pulpits because the churches are funded by tax deductible funds. So a political sermon would be more in terms of discussing a topic according to what the Bible teaches on a subject rather than the views of a political party. The left wing people have fake moral outrage. They don't believe in absolutes until they see someone like Trump who they believe threatens their liberal utopia. So it's like saying you don't believe in the devil, but then Trump comes along and you can't vote for him because he is "the devil." Model T El Camino Pinto |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 3:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Chevy Vega Cadillac Cimarron Dodge Duster |
Author: | Brick [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
It's a good trend. |
Author: | Drake LaRrieta [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: It's a good trend. George Washington said: “Virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government,” and “Human rights can only be assured among a virtuous people.” Benjamin Franklin said: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” James Madison stated: “To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical [imaginary] idea.” Thomas Jefferson wrote, “No government can continue good but under the control of the people; and … their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice … These are the inculcations necessary to render the people a sure basis for the structure and order of government.” Samuel Adams said: “Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend of the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue.” Patrick Henry stated that: “A vitiated [impure] state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom.” John Adams stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Drake LaRrieta wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: It's a good trend. George Washington said: “Virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government,” and “Human rights can only be assured among a virtuous people.” Benjamin Franklin said: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” James Madison stated: “To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical [imaginary] idea.” Thomas Jefferson wrote, “No government can continue good but under the control of the people; and … their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice … These are the inculcations necessary to render the people a sure basis for the structure and order of government.” Samuel Adams said: “Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend of the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue.” Patrick Henry stated that: “A vitiated [impure] state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom.” John Adams stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” I'm sure these quotes are plastered all over Trump's gold toilet. |
Author: | Nas [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 5:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
In Lemont the Sunday before the election. #ALLPEOPLEMATTER |
Author: | BeerFan [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
#Evita #safeSpace |
Author: | pittmike [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
BeerFan wrote: #Evita #safeSpace that is pretty good. |
Author: | lipidquadcab [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 8:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Drake LaRrieta wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: It's a good trend. George Washington said: “Virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government,” and “Human rights can only be assured among a virtuous people.” Benjamin Franklin said: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” James Madison stated: “To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical [imaginary] idea.” Thomas Jefferson wrote, “No government can continue good but under the control of the people; and … their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice … These are the inculcations necessary to render the people a sure basis for the structure and order of government.” Samuel Adams said: “Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend of the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue.” Patrick Henry stated that: “A vitiated [impure] state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom.” John Adams stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Is it safe to assume you believe one can't be moral or virtuous in the absence of religion? Because, if so...woof... |
Author: | BeerFan [ Sat Jan 14, 2017 9:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
pittmike wrote: BeerFan wrote: #Evita #safeSpace that is pretty good. I would not have such a heart in my bosom, for the dignity of the whole body. Macbeth #JimmyReardon #MrJimmy #FriendofPipple |
Author: | Brick [ Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Drake LaRrieta wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: It's a good trend. George Washington said: “Virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government,” and “Human rights can only be assured among a virtuous people.” Benjamin Franklin said: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” James Madison stated: “To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical [imaginary] idea.” Thomas Jefferson wrote, “No government can continue good but under the control of the people; and … their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice … These are the inculcations necessary to render the people a sure basis for the structure and order of government.” Samuel Adams said: “Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend of the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue.” Patrick Henry stated that: “A vitiated [impure] state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom.” John Adams stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Jan 15, 2017 10:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Drake LaRrieta wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: It's a good trend. George Washington said: “Virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government,” and “Human rights can only be assured among a virtuous people.” Benjamin Franklin said: “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom.” James Madison stated: “To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical [imaginary] idea.” Thomas Jefferson wrote, “No government can continue good but under the control of the people; and … their minds are to be informed by education what is right and what wrong; to be encouraged in habits of virtue and to be deterred from those of vice … These are the inculcations necessary to render the people a sure basis for the structure and order of government.” Samuel Adams said: “Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt. He therefore is the truest friend of the liberty of his country who tries most to promote its virtue.” Patrick Henry stated that: “A vitiated [impure] state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, is incompatible with freedom.” John Adams stated: “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Grover Cleveland Teddy Roosevelt William Howard Taft |
Author: | Chus [ Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Drake LaRrieta wrote: The vast majority of Evangelicals voted for Trump. Yes. Evangelicals voted for a thrice married philanderer, who fantasizes about fucking his own daughter. MANY have been exposed as the hypocrites and frauds that they have always been. |
Author: | Drake LaRrieta [ Sun Jan 15, 2017 12:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: 2016 Election: Decline of Religion in Public Life? |
Chus wrote: Drake LaRrieta wrote: The vast majority of Evangelicals voted for Trump. Yes. Evangelicals voted for a thrice married philanderer, who fantasizes about fucking his own daughter. MANY have been exposed as the hypocrites and frauds that they have always been. Who was Trump against? Hillary Clinton. Her husband was accused of rape and his wife destroyed the reputation of his accusers. Trump is no boyscout, but he's better than the alternative. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |