It is currently Mon Feb 24, 2025 12:20 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I fell down a youtube rabbit hole last night watching these videos. I always dismissed it as tin foil hat idiots and there certainly is plenty of that. There is also some disturbing issues that don't seem to have been discussed or investigated by the 9/11 commission. What say you CFMB? Any credence to this stuff or is it all BS?

The thing that has really got me is the engine found on Murray St. Plenty of very clear pictures. It doesn't belong to a 767 (both planes that crashed into the towers), it has been identified as an engine found on a 737...

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:55 am
Posts: 9340
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
You can see the devil's face in the smoke so I blame him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
The towers were brought down by fires weakening the steel of a building that was severely compromised by the impact of the jetliners.

The structure of the WTC towers was unique in that the exterior wall (and a central core) provided the bulk of the structural support. The walls that were destroyed by the impact were more or less an exoskeleton for the building. That is why the 2nd tower that was hit fell first. The plane hit it at an angle where it punched through two perpendicular sides of the building and put a significant amount of stress on that surviving corner between them. The steel columns that remained were asked to take on a higher load than they were designed to and could've done so had they not had fire reduce their strength to 50%.

Those buildings could have survived the fires or they could have survived the plane impacts. They could not survive both in conjunction with each other.

It's also worth noting that at 450 knots, those planes impacted at 3 times the speed you typically see in a plane crash as most crashes occur near landing/take-off at 150 knots. Given the standard KE = 1/2mv^2 equation, we find that tripling the velocity means that the energy of the impact is increased by a factor of 9.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe on Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19525
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I fell down a youtube rabbit hole last night watching these videos. I always dismissed it as tin foil hat idiots and there certainly is plenty of that. There is also some disturbing issues that don't seem to have been discussed or investigated by the 9/11 commission. What say you CFMB? Any credence to this stuff or is it all BS?

The thing that has really got me is the engine found on Murray St. Plenty of very clear pictures. It doesn't belong to a 767 (both planes that crashed into the towers), it has been identified as an engine found on a 737...


I think that as with any major government investigation the aim is to cover their ass rather than actual find out what occurred. I believe that's the main issue with conspiracy theories of this sort. That said, it happened on live television, so I believe what I saw, not the controlled blast or some of the other crazy things.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19347
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The towers were brought down by fires weakening the steel of a building that was severely compromised by the impact of the jetliners.

The structure of the WTC towers was unique in that the exterior wall (and a central core) provided the bulk of the structural support. The walls that were destroyed by the impact were more or less an exoskeleton for the building. That is why the 2nd tower that was hit fell first. The plane hit it at an angle where it punched through two perpendicular sides of the building and put a significant amount of stress on that surviving corner between them. The steel columns that remained were asked to take on a higher load than they were designed to and could've done so had they not had fire reduce their strength to 50%.

Those buildings could have survived the fires or they could have survived the plane impacts. They could not survive both in conjunction with each other.


That's some New World Order lizard-person talk if I've ever heard it.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
I fell down a youtube rabbit hole last night watching these videos. I always dismissed it as tin foil hat idiots and there certainly is plenty of that. There is also some disturbing issues that don't seem to have been discussed or investigated by the 9/11 commission. What say you CFMB? Any credence to this stuff or is it all BS?

The thing that has really got me is the engine found on Murray St. Plenty of very clear pictures. It doesn't belong to a 767 (both planes that crashed into the towers), it has been identified as an engine found on a 737...


I think that as with any major government investigation the aim is to cover their ass rather than actual find out what occurred. I believe that's the main issue with conspiracy theories of this sort. That said, it happened on live television, so I believe what I saw, not the controlled blast or some of the other crazy things.

I discount 90% of conspiracy theories off the bat based upon the idea that our government is too fucking stupid to pull off anything competently.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The towers were brought down by fires weakening the steel of a building that was severely compromised by the impact of the jetliners.

The structure of the WTC towers was unique in that the exterior wall (and a central core) provided the bulk of the structural support. The walls that were destroyed by the impact were more or less an exoskeleton for the building. That is why the 2nd tower that was hit fell first. The plane hit it at an angle where it punched through two perpendicular sides of the building and put a significant amount of stress on that surviving corner between them. The steel columns that remained were asked to take on a higher load than they were designed to and could've done so had they not had fire reduce their strength to 50%.

Those buildings could have survived the fires or they could have survived the plane impacts. They could not survive both in conjunction with each other.


I'm not saying that a plane didn't crash. I'm more concerned with how an engine from a 737 was found when we were told two 767s crashed into the buildings. That is what has me wearing the tin foil hat right now. :lol:

Also that doesn't explain why tower 7 collapsed from only fire. :mrgreen:

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
Pretty sure it is Panther that loves talking on this topic. Maybe 4 years ago I think he took on all comers with his conspiracy beliefs on the subject. He'll be along to give you the scoop.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Building 7 was never hit, yet it fell, just like a professional, controlled implosion. There hasn't been a good explanation for that.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23568
pizza_Place: Giordano's
From what I've seen and interacted with, MANY conspiracy theorists zero-in on the NIST report, alleging that the report's own analysis of the heat in the buildings prior to catastrophic failure didn't show the heat of any widespread area rising to the point of significantly reducing the load-bearing ability of the core columns and floor trusses. NIST showed there wasn't enough heat, they say, to cause the floor trusses to "sag" and fail where they were joined to the outer columns, which is what NIST said happened (which subsequently, because of the "hat" truss, resulted in a redistributed load to other perimeter and core columns which they were not able to sustain in their weakened state).

However, even if you take all of what they say at face value (the temperature of the trusses and columns never got hot enough to weaken load-bearing ability), all of the theories reduce to absurdity when they attempt to explain exactly how the buildings fell, if not by structural failure brought on by initial impact and resultant fires. People talk about spec-ops teams bringing in detcord to hide in the radiators which ran along the outer walls, hidden bombs, "pulling" the buildings down by FDNY, and all sorts of other zany shit.

They try to gloss over this obvious failing of their explanation of events by trying to focus on outlandish potential motives, things like the Black Eagle Trust, the insurance taken out on the buildings by their owner, some SEC documents contained in one of the buildings that was about to cause a bunch of issues, the rumored prohibitive cost of modernizing the older towers. It all gets brought up to distract from the patently absurd way they say the buildings actually came down.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The towers were brought down by fires weakening the steel of a building that was severely compromised by the impact of the jetliners.

The structure of the WTC towers was unique in that the exterior wall (and a central core) provided the bulk of the structural support. The walls that were destroyed by the impact were more or less an exoskeleton for the building. That is why the 2nd tower that was hit fell first. The plane hit it at an angle where it punched through two perpendicular sides of the building and put a significant amount of stress on that surviving corner between them. The steel columns that remained were asked to take on a higher load than they were designed to and could've done so had they not had fire reduce their strength to 50%.

Those buildings could have survived the fires or they could have survived the plane impacts. They could not survive both in conjunction with each other.


I'm not saying that a plane didn't crash. I'm more concerned with how an engine from a 737 was found when we were told two 767s crashed into the buildings. That is what has me wearing the tin foil hat right now. :lol:

Also that doesn't explain why tower 7 collapsed from only fire. :mrgreen:

The problem is it wasn't a 737 engine. You're being fed false info as 737s have CFM-56 engines with a flatted nacelle to account for their low ground clearance. That was not a CFM-56. It was a JT9D and you can look at photos of them with the nacelles removed to see that.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Chus wrote:
Building 7 was never hit, yet it fell, just like a professional, controlled implosion. There hasn't been a good explanation for that.


Exactly! Ogie made the point that a lot of deniers use. It could have handled fire or a plane crash. Tower 7 only had a fire and still fell. And they were finding molten steel 3 days later. Molten steel!

I feel so dirty even entertaining these thoughts but there are a lot of loose ends in my mind.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38943
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
If the government or bigfan hasn't permanently silenced him, I believe jbills will be along to discuss conspiracy theories .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23568
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Chus wrote:
Building 7 was never hit, yet it fell, just like a professional, controlled implosion. There hasn't been a good explanation for that.


It was hit, by one of the towers ripping out about 15 floors down one side.

Image


Last edited by Juice's Lecture Notes on Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Chus wrote:
Building 7 was never hit, yet it fell, just like a professional, controlled implosion. There hasn't been a good explanation for that.

There was, the bottom 3rd of the building got carved out by being hit by the falling twin towers. That was combined with uncontrolled diesel fires fed by the building's generator fuel supply. The fact is FDNY examined the building 90 minutes before it collapsed and ordered their personnel to evacuate as they could see that the structure had been compromised to the point it that collapse was imminent. The fact that it collapsed when it did was a shock to no structural engineer or firefighter on the scene as they saw the damage it sustained.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Last edited by Ogie Oglethorpe on Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38943
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
badrogue17 wrote:
If the government or bigfan hasn't permanently silenced him, I believe jbills is the resident expert on conspiracy theories .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Chus wrote:
Building 7 was never hit, yet it fell, just like a professional, controlled implosion. There hasn't been a good explanation for that.


Exactly! Ogie made the point that a lot of deniers use. It could have handled fire or a plane crash. Tower 7 only had a fire and still fell. And they were finding molten steel 3 days later. Molten steel!

I feel so dirty even entertaining these thoughts but there are a lot of loose ends in my mind.


As long as you aren't one of those goofs who claim the twin towers weren't even hit by planes, you'll be alright.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Any you all call me crazy and delusional

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The towers were brought down by fires weakening the steel of a building that was severely compromised by the impact of the jetliners.

The structure of the WTC towers was unique in that the exterior wall (and a central core) provided the bulk of the structural support. The walls that were destroyed by the impact were more or less an exoskeleton for the building. That is why the 2nd tower that was hit fell first. The plane hit it at an angle where it punched through two perpendicular sides of the building and put a significant amount of stress on that surviving corner between them. The steel columns that remained were asked to take on a higher load than they were designed to and could've done so had they not had fire reduce their strength to 50%.

Those buildings could have survived the fires or they could have survived the plane impacts. They could not survive both in conjunction with each other.


I'm not saying that a plane didn't crash. I'm more concerned with how an engine from a 737 was found when we were told two 767s crashed into the buildings. That is what has me wearing the tin foil hat right now. :lol:

Also that doesn't explain why tower 7 collapsed from only fire. :mrgreen:

The problem is it wasn't a 737 engine. You're being fed false info as 737s have CFM-56 engines with a flatted nacelle to account for their low ground clearance. That was not a CFM-56. It was a JT9D and you can look at photos of them with the nacelles removed to see that.


Why does it have a different cooling duct?

They shown that it was a JT9D but not the same one on a 767.

I'm not being a dick. I want the facts so that I can go back to being a normal human again. :lol:

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Last edited by Hank Scorpio on Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
chaspoppcap wrote:
Any you all call me crazy and delusional



Nothing in this thread changes that.

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33243
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I discount 90% of conspiracy theories off the bat based upon the idea that our government is too fucking stupid to pull off anything competently.


The President of the United States has a private conversation with the Australian Prime Minister, and it gets leaked almost in real time. Yeah, they have no chance of a real conspiracy going off without it getting foiled a thousand different ways.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19494
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
All of you who believe in this are in the same camp as Alex Jones, think about that for a second.
Read Jim Marrs Book, he tries to sew it all together then bam once again,Aliens.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17331
pizza_Place: Pequods
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The towers were brought down by fires weakening the steel of a building that was severely compromised by the impact of the jetliners.

The structure of the WTC towers was unique in that the exterior wall (and a central core) provided the bulk of the structural support. The walls that were destroyed by the impact were more or less an exoskeleton for the building. That is why the 2nd tower that was hit fell first. The plane hit it at an angle where it punched through two perpendicular sides of the building and put a significant amount of stress on that surviving corner between them. The steel columns that remained were asked to take on a higher load than they were designed to and could've done so had they not had fire reduce their strength to 50%.

Those buildings could have survived the fires or they could have survived the plane impacts. They could not survive both in conjunction with each other.


I'm not saying that a plane didn't crash. I'm more concerned with how an engine from a 737 was found when we were told two 767s crashed into the buildings. That is what has me wearing the tin foil hat right now. :lol:

Also that doesn't explain why tower 7 collapsed from only fire. :mrgreen:

The problem is it wasn't a 737 engine. You're being fed false info as 737s have CFM-56 engines with a flatted nacelle to account for their low ground clearance. That was not a CFM-56. It was a JT9D and you can look at photos of them with the nacelles removed to see that.


Why does it have a different cooling duct?

They shown that it was a JT9D but not the same one on a 767.

I'm not being a dick. I want the facts so that I can go back to being a normal human again. :lol:

The JT9D has several iterations and most of them have that cooling duct, including those used on the 767.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16732
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
As bad as it was that the towers fell, what do you think would have happened if they hadn't fallen? Can you imagine the area that would have had to be evacuated for months/years while they came up with demolition plan (assuming there was no way they could repair them and risk having them fall at any time). It was almost a blessing (except for those who perished of course) that they fell so quickly.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
The towers were brought down by fires weakening the steel of a building that was severely compromised by the impact of the jetliners.

The structure of the WTC towers was unique in that the exterior wall (and a central core) provided the bulk of the structural support. The walls that were destroyed by the impact were more or less an exoskeleton for the building. That is why the 2nd tower that was hit fell first. The plane hit it at an angle where it punched through two perpendicular sides of the building and put a significant amount of stress on that surviving corner between them. The steel columns that remained were asked to take on a higher load than they were designed to and could've done so had they not had fire reduce their strength to 50%.

Those buildings could have survived the fires or they could have survived the plane impacts. They could not survive both in conjunction with each other.


I'm not saying that a plane didn't crash. I'm more concerned with how an engine from a 737 was found when we were told two 767s crashed into the buildings. That is what has me wearing the tin foil hat right now. :lol:

Also that doesn't explain why tower 7 collapsed from only fire. :mrgreen:

The problem is it wasn't a 737 engine. You're being fed false info as 737s have CFM-56 engines with a flatted nacelle to account for their low ground clearance. That was not a CFM-56. It was a JT9D and you can look at photos of them with the nacelles removed to see that.


Why does it have a different cooling duct?

They shown that it was a JT9D but not the same one on a 767.

I'm not being a dick. I want the facts so that I can go back to being a normal human again. :lol:

The JT9D has several iterations and most of them have that cooling duct, including those used on the 767.


Youre doing well. Thank you. I'll PM you this weekend after another lengthy binge watch session and get my head back on straight. :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
chaspoppcap wrote:
All of you who believe in this are in the same camp as Alex Jones, think about that for a second.


Not one person said they believed it was an inside job, perpetrated by the United States government. Not one.

You should try thinking.

Image

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Chus wrote:
Building 7 was never hit, yet it fell, just like a professional, controlled implosion. There hasn't been a good explanation for that.


First Bigfoot and now this.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
leashyourkids wrote:
Chus wrote:
Building 7 was never hit, yet it fell, just like a professional, controlled implosion. There hasn't been a good explanation for that.


First Bigfoot and now this.

:lol:

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2017 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24714
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
beni hanna wrote:
Pretty sure it is Panther that loves talking on this topic. Maybe 4 years ago I think he took on all comers with his conspiracy beliefs on the subject. He'll be along to give you the scoop.


Yeah, I originally figured it was a Panther thread, but he wouldn't have called it just a theory.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group