Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Historians do another list https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=105129 |
Page 1 of 15 |
Author: | FavreFan [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Historians do another list |
Quote: Here are the full rankings: 1. Abraham Lincoln 2. George Washington 3. Franklin Delano Roosevelt 4. Teddy Roosevelt 5. Dwight Eisenhower 6. Harry Truman 7. Thomas Jefferson 8. John F. Kennedy 9. Ronald Reagan 10. Lyndon Johnson 11. Woodrow Wilson 12. Barack Obama 13. James Monroe 14. James Polk 15. Bill Clinton 16. William McKinley 17. James Madison 18. Andrew Jackson 19. John Adams 20. George H.W. Bush 21. John Q. Adams 22. Ulysses Grant 23. Grover Cleveland 24. William Taft 25. Gerald Ford 26. Jimmy Carter 27. Calvin Coolidge 28. Richard Nixon 29. James Garfield 30. Benjamin Harrison 31. Zachary Taylor 32. Rutherford Hayes 33. George W. Bush 34. Martin Van Buren 35. Chester Arthur 36. Herbert Hoover 37. Millard Fillmore 38. William Harrison 39. John Tyler 40. Warren Harding 41. Franklin Pierce 42. Andrew Johnson 43. James Buchanan http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/a ... ngs-235149 |
Author: | Brick [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 3:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Hottest Presidents? |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
12 seed for the first time is not bad. |
Author: | Nas [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Andrew Johnson should be last on every list and George Washington should always be #1. The Roosevelts should be 2 and 3. Everything else is debatable. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Grover Cleveland is only on there once. |
Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
I don't know, people on Twitter are telling me that Obama is a Muslim terrorist who did noting at all during his presidency but make the rich richer and the poor poorer. Maybe 13th? |
Author: | FavreFan [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
JFK is always laughably overrated in these. Fuckin' boomers |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 4:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
FavreFan wrote: JFK is always laughably overrated in these. Fuckin' boomers It's the X'er daddy issues. They loved smooth talkers like JFK and Reagan. |
Author: | Telegram Sam [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 5:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Millard Fillmore is the worst president, in that his was once the only name I could not remember, thereby costing me a bar bet. I remember you now, Millard Fillmore. My fiery hatred has forever burnished your name in my mind. Millard Fillmore. |
Author: | newper [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
I think Rutherford Hayes did pretty well given the circumstances he was thrust into. Not all of us get to be President for 12 years to cheat our way to the top. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
FavreFan wrote: JFK is always laughably overrated in these. Fuckin' boomers Kennedy was not a better president than his successor. |
Author: | MajorKong [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Chester A. Arthur was a criminally underrated president. |
Author: | sinicalypse [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
you know it's called "BuzzFeed" for a reason: evidently humanity reached a point where enough people were told to "fuck off and die" that they were hungry for anything superfluous in a world that's gotten way too "WHY SO SERIOUS?" and uhh..... holy shit, DONALD FUCKING TRUMP IS PRESIDENT AND I'M AFRAID THAT THE WORLD'S LEGITIMATELY GOING TO END BECAUSE SOME WORLD LEADER IS GOING TO IMPLY THAT HE HAS A SMALL DICK!!! WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING!!! NO JOKE!!! I'VE GOT KIDS SO I GOTTA THINK ABOUT WHAT KIND OF WORLD I'M BRINGING THEM INTO YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING?!! Sponsored Content via https://www.buzzfeed.com/joeveix/the-to ... rrass-c3sp The Top 10 DUMBEST BuzzFeed Lists You’re EMBARRASSED To Say You CLICKED LOL FAIL! 1. The 25 HUNKIEST Egyptian Protestors more like mohamed el-NINNY, amirite? 2. The 100 Ways You TOTALLY Killed Your Tamagotchi! u went to college/?! 3. 13 CRAZY Facts You Never Knew About CAROLINE IN THE CITY did u kno the character of Del Cassidy was originally going to be played by a convicted pedophile? 4. The 30 GOOFIEST Cats That Have Better Lives Than The Chinese Children Who Made Your iPhone! CUTE ALERT! 5. Top 20 Sponsored Posts You NEED To See! This [HONDA] is [RED BULL] a [OUTBACK STEAK HOUSE] sponsored [SAMSUNG] bullet [DOVE SOAP] point [7UP] demonstrating [HALLIBURTON] the [APPLE] future [WALMART] of [GOOGLE] journalism [AXE BODY SPRAY]. 6. This Is The Guy Who Played Barney For Most Of Your Childhood MIND BLOWN! 7. Twenty Disney Princesses With A SERIOUS Case Of “Bitch Face” Calm down, ladies! 8. The 10 WACKIEST Genocides of the ’90s! ’90s kids will GET this one! “No soup for you!” “Show me the MONEY!” 9. 5 ADORABLE Puppies That Have No Clue That One Day They’ll Die “DOH!” 10. 22 Fotos That Will Restore Your Faith In Humanity Without You Actually Having To Do Anything To Help Improve It 1. ![]() 2. ![]() 3-21. ??? 22. ![]() |
Author: | Nas [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Curious Hair wrote: FavreFan wrote: JFK is always laughably overrated in these. Fuckin' boomers Kennedy was not a better president than his successor. Agreed. |
Author: | Colonel Angus [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 7:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
FavreFan wrote: JFK is always laughably overrated in these. Fuckin' boomers Bill Kurtis & the people who do Decades have such a fucking hard-on for him. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
The only problems with Ike were (a) he recognized Nixon for what he was and used him for that purpose, and (b) he let Churchill cajole him into fucking with Iran so BP & Aramco could keep making their oil money. One wonders what history might look like if Ike had stuck to his guns and said 'no' as a final answer. |
Author: | Nas [ Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Lincoln getting too much love. Sad! |
Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Curious Hair wrote: FavreFan wrote: JFK is always laughably overrated in these. Fuckin' boomers Kennedy was not a better president than his successor. If Lyndon were president in 1962 we would not be having this conversation. Or any conversations. |
Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Nas wrote: Lincoln getting too much love. Sad! The slave-owning oligarch first president is better than Lincoln? That take is sad. |
Author: | Nas [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 11:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: Nas wrote: Lincoln getting too much love. Sad! The slave-owning oligarch first president is better than Lincoln? That take is sad. Yes and it really isn't even close. |
Author: | Psycory [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 12:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Teddy is fourth and still underrated. |
Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 12:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Nas wrote: WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: Nas wrote: Lincoln getting too much love. Sad! The slave-owning oligarch first president is better than Lincoln? That take is sad. Yes and it really isn't even close. Lincoln was better in nearly every way including ending the legacy that Washington left behind that threatened to destroy the county. And he signed legislation establishing land grant universities. Washington's biggest contribution was walking away. |
Author: | America [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 12:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Ronald Reagan #9 ![]() |
Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 1:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
America wrote: Ronald Reagan #9 ![]() Honestly. A total disaster. |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 1:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Nas wrote: WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: Nas wrote: Lincoln getting too much love. Sad! The slave-owning oligarch first president is better than Lincoln? That take is sad. Yes and it really isn't even close. Nas, I know you are stashing some contrarian opinion about Lincoln, but I really don't see how there's an argument that he is overrated. Whether what he did was for political reasons or not, he accomplished great things for the country. |
Author: | Chus [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 1:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
![]() |
Author: | Nas [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 2:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
leashyourkids wrote: Nas wrote: WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: Nas wrote: Lincoln getting too much love. Sad! The slave-owning oligarch first president is better than Lincoln? That take is sad. Yes and it really isn't even close. Nas, I know you are stashing some contrarian opinion about Lincoln, but I really don't see how there's an argument that he is overrated. Whether what he did was for political reasons or not, he accomplished great things for the country. I don't understand why you dismiss the fact that he didn't do it because of his strong conviction about how WRONG slavery was. He just wanted to weaken the south. The fact that it was political is very important when discussing the character of the man and ranking him as a president. MANY pretend that he cared about black America when he didn't. Lincoln wanted to send blacks back to Africa. Beyond that his power grabs and disregard of the constitution makes President Trump's dick hard. |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 2:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Nas wrote: leashyourkids wrote: Nas wrote: WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: Nas wrote: Lincoln getting too much love. Sad! The slave-owning oligarch first president is better than Lincoln? That take is sad. Yes and it really isn't even close. Nas, I know you are stashing some contrarian opinion about Lincoln, but I really don't see how there's an argument that he is overrated. Whether what he did was for political reasons or not, he accomplished great things for the country. I don't understand why you dismiss the fact that he didn't do it because of his strong conviction about how WRONG slavery was. He just wanted to weaken the south. The fact that it was political is very important when discussing the character of the man and ranking him as a president. MANY pretend that he cared about black America when he didn't. Lincoln wanted to send blacks back to Africa. Beyond that his power grabs and disregard of the constitution makes President Trump's dick hard. Yeah, but he was probably still more progressive than most at that time. Obviously, not being 100% against slavery or equality was wrong, but I think you do have to take into account the context of the era in which he lived. Societal norms are hard things to overcome. Your boy George H.W. probably would have been pro-slavery if he'd lived in that time period. Slavery, which was so obviously horrible in hindsight, was something that would never have been easily overcome given how it basically drove the economy of the South. For an issue like that which has no guarantee of ever being banished, I think the ends justify the means. If Lincoln hadn't overreached, slavery might not have ended. Now that I think of it, maybe we should be praising Trump. ![]() |
Author: | WaitingforRuffcorn [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Nas wrote: leashyourkids wrote: Nas wrote: WaitingforRuffcorn wrote: Nas wrote: Lincoln getting too much love. Sad! The slave-owning oligarch first president is better than Lincoln? That take is sad. Yes and it really isn't even close. Nas, I know you are stashing some contrarian opinion about Lincoln, but I really don't see how there's an argument that he is overrated. Whether what he did was for political reasons or not, he accomplished great things for the country. I don't understand why you dismiss the fact that he didn't do it because of his strong conviction about how WRONG slavery was. He just wanted to weaken the south. The fact that it was political is very important when discussing the character of the man and ranking him as a president. MANY pretend that he cared about black America when he didn't. Lincoln wanted to send blacks back to Africa. Beyond that his power grabs and disregard of the constitution makes President Trump's dick hard. The man ended slavery, and he's to be blamed for not being progressive enough by today's standards? That's harsh. Lincoln was literally a martyr for black rights. And his "power grab" was in response to half the country rebelling over his winning of a fair election. What should he have done? Let the country be divided, and have a slave economy state in collusion with European powers on this continent? Winning that war ended up saving many lives in the long run, many of them black. And as for moving slaves back to Africa, it was an idea that seemed humanitarian at the time. There were black leaders that supported it. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Feb 19, 2017 2:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Historians do another list |
Elmhurst Steve wants to ship them all back today. |
Page 1 of 15 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |