Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Gender Upcharge https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=107842 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Gender Upcharge |
http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/08/world/caf ... index.html |
Author: | Caller Bob [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
![]() |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
No problem with it. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Leash has turned into WaitingForJLN. Very sad. |
Author: | Jbi11s [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
FavreFan wrote: Leash has turned into WaitingForJLN. Very sad. The rain watching garage time has had a irreversible effect it seems. |
Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Oh for fuck's sake |
Author: | Hockey Gay [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Once again, there is no pay gap in the USA. Bad article. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Hockey Gay wrote: Once again, there is no pay gap in the USA. Bad article. Both true. But who cares about what some Aussie woman does with her shitty coffee shop? |
Author: | Caller Bob [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Hockey Gay wrote: Once again, there is no pay gap in the USA. Bad article. Both true. But who cares about what some Aussie woman does with her shitty coffee shop? If I tuck it back between my legs, do I still have to pay the 18%? Would you tuck? ![]() |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 9:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Hockey Gay wrote: Once again, there is no pay gap in the USA. Bad article. Both true. But who cares about what some Aussie woman does with her shitty coffee shop? I believe it exists but its like 5%, not 22 5% for unmarried women |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Google fired a guy yesterday for voicing his opinion that the wage gap is not sexist.... http://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp |
Author: | Modern Beta Male [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Hockey Gay wrote: Once again, there is no pay gap in the USA. Bad article. Wow, misogyny and bigotry all under the sandwich of a basic dirt-bag. You should be studied by science. |
Author: | Quad City Pete [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Hockey Gay wrote: Once again, there is no pay gap in the USA. Bad article. Did the portion of your daddy's jizz that contained the brain component get left on the fucking bed sheets between your mother's legs? The numbers are clear. Women make less than men for the same work. That is a fact you may not argue against. And beautiful black women are at an even greater disadvantage in the workplace dominated by straight white cisgendered males like yourself. Maybe you should stop watching racist misogynistic crap like Blackhawks hockey and spend your time viewing Insecure featuring the gorgeous Issa Rae and you might learn something. |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 10:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Quad City Pete wrote: Hockey Gay wrote: Once again, there is no pay gap in the USA. Bad article. Did the portion of your daddy's jizz that contained the brain component get left on the fucking bed sheets between your mother's legs? The numbers are clear. Women make less than men for the same work. That is a fact you may not argue against. And beautiful black women are at an even greater disadvantage in the workplace dominated by straight white cisgendered males like yourself. Maybe you should stop watching racist misogynistic crap like Blackhawks hockey and spend your time viewing Insecure featuring the gorgeous Issa Rae and you might learn something. ![]() |
Author: | Franky T [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
I wonder how giving the money to the Café owners makes all of the discrimination, repression, chauvinism, objectification and general demeaning behavior of men, ok? |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
This isnt new. It's called Ladies night. Very popular in the 80s. |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
FavreFan wrote: Leash has turned into WaitingForJLN. Very sad. I didn't share my opinion yet. |
Author: | Bagels [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: Leash has turned into WaitingForJLN. Very sad. I didn't share my opinion yet. don't keep us on the edge of our seats |
Author: | Caller Bob [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
If a man pays the upcharge then he can pee sitting down in the bathroom. |
Author: | Douchebag [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
MANY are fans of the free market until it affects themselves. |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Bagels wrote: leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: Leash has turned into WaitingForJLN. Very sad. I didn't share my opinion yet. don't keep us on the edge of our seats I've had about enough of your shit lately. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
ridiculous |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
MANY on this board will be furious about this cafe. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 12:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
C Howitt Ripoffs Furious? |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
On the surface, I have no issue with this. It's their business to do with as they please. I think alienating 50% of customers is a bad idea but there is no such thing as bad publicity. However, this is where it sucks being pro market, what if the racist old codger up the block decides he wants to have the exact same model but higher prices for black people. By my same logic I would be forced to side with the business owner despite thinking it's stupid and a terrible idea. It really forces you into a trick bag intellectually. |
Author: | Brick [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Hank Scorpio wrote: On the surface, I have no issue with this. It's their business to do with as they please. I think alienating 50% of customers is a bad idea but there is no such thing as bad publicity. However, this is where it sucks being pro market, what if the racist old codger up the block decides he wants to have the exact same model but higher prices for black people. By my same logic I would be forced to side with the business owner despite thinking it's stupid and a terrible idea. It really forces you into a trick bag intellectually. It is no doubt wrong to do this. There shouldn't be a debate.I assume it is just a publicity stunt anyways. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: On the surface, I have no issue with this. It's their business to do with as they please. I think alienating 50% of customers is a bad idea but there is no such thing as bad publicity. However, this is where it sucks being pro market, what if the racist old codger up the block decides he wants to have the exact same model but higher prices for black people. By my same logic I would be forced to side with the business owner despite thinking it's stupid and a terrible idea. It really forces you into a trick bag intellectually. It is no doubt wrong to do this. There shouldn't be a debate.I assume it is just a publicity stunt anyways. Hank is thinking along the lines of... "businesses can and should be able to do anything they want in the name of BUSINESS" |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
Hank Scorpio wrote: On the surface, I have no issue with this. It's their business to do with as they please. I think alienating 50% of customers is a bad idea but there is no such thing as bad publicity. However, this is where it sucks being pro market, what if the racist old codger up the block decides he wants to have the exact same model but higher prices for black people. By my same logic I would be forced to side with the business owner despite thinking it's stupid and a terrible idea. It really forces you into a trick bag intellectually. You just say who cares. It's liberating. |
Author: | Brick [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
rogers park bryan wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: On the surface, I have no issue with this. It's their business to do with as they please. I think alienating 50% of customers is a bad idea but there is no such thing as bad publicity. However, this is where it sucks being pro market, what if the racist old codger up the block decides he wants to have the exact same model but higher prices for black people. By my same logic I would be forced to side with the business owner despite thinking it's stupid and a terrible idea. It really forces you into a trick bag intellectually. It is no doubt wrong to do this. There shouldn't be a debate.I assume it is just a publicity stunt anyways. Hank is thinking along the lines of... "businesses can and should be able to do anything they want in the name of BUSINESS" Businesses are people. They have to follow rules just like we do. No one would say that I have the right to do anything I please. |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Tue Aug 08, 2017 1:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Gender Upcharge |
rogers park bryan wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: On the surface, I have no issue with this. It's their business to do with as they please. I think alienating 50% of customers is a bad idea but there is no such thing as bad publicity. However, this is where it sucks being pro market, what if the racist old codger up the block decides he wants to have the exact same model but higher prices for black people. By my same logic I would be forced to side with the business owner despite thinking it's stupid and a terrible idea. It really forces you into a trick bag intellectually. It is no doubt wrong to do this. There shouldn't be a debate.I assume it is just a publicity stunt anyways. Hank is thinking along the lines of... "businesses can and should be able to do anything they want in the name of BUSINESS" To a certain degree. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |