| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Kate Steinle verdict https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=109778 |
Page 1 of 5 |
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Kate Steinle verdict |
Not guilty. Not even Involuntary? Unbelievable. Get ready for the anger of the OJ acquittal multiplied by the internet and 2017. Good times. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
rogers park bryan wrote: Not guilty. Not even Involuntary? Unbelievable. Get ready for the anger of the OJ acquittal multiplied by the internet and 2017. Good times. Doubtful . |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
That’s pretty fucked up. |
|
| Author: | shirtless driver [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Kate Steinle kinda looks like a sea lion, so it was probably just an honest case of mistaken identity...... |
|
| Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
I hope this motherfucker gets found with his dick in his mouth hanging from a bridge in Jaurez or Border Patrol leaves him handcuffed in ditch somewhere. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
badrogue17 wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Not guilty. Not even Involuntary? Unbelievable. Get ready for the anger of the OJ acquittal multiplied by the internet and 2017. Good times. Doubtful . What are you doubting? The anger people will have for the Injustice like they did back then? |
|
| Author: | SpiralStairs [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
ToxicMasculinity wrote: I hope this motherfucker gets found with his dick in his mouth hanging from a bridge in Jaurez or Border Patrol leaves him handcuffed in ditch somewhere. Why so angry? She was most likely a thot. |
|
| Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
SpiralStairs wrote: ToxicMasculinity wrote: I hope this motherfucker gets found with his dick in his mouth hanging from a bridge in Jaurez or Border Patrol leaves him handcuffed in ditch somewhere. Why so angry? She was most likely a thot. She's an American thot! If anyone has a right to kill her it should be her husband/bf as statistics and God intended. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
So why the not guilty verdict? IIRC didn't he admit he was the one who shot her, just that it was an accident or some shit? How is that not involuntary manslaughter? |
|
| Author: | SpiralStairs [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
ToxicMasculinity wrote: SpiralStairs wrote: ToxicMasculinity wrote: I hope this motherfucker gets found with his dick in his mouth hanging from a bridge in Jaurez or Border Patrol leaves him handcuffed in ditch somewhere. Why so angry? She was most likely a thot. She's an American thot! If anyone has a right to kill her it should be her husband/bf as statistics and God intended. This is the proper response. |
|
| Author: | newper [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Quote: Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, who had been deported five times from the U.S., was accused of fatally shooting 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle in the back while walking with her father on July 1, 2015. If he was walking with her father, he must of known who she was. |
|
| Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
FavreFan wrote: So why the not guilty verdict? IIRC didn't he admit he was the one who shot her, just that it was an accident or some shit? How is that not involuntary manslaughter? Don't think he was charged with it. The only verdicts I've seen reported are on murder and gun possession charges. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Jury had the option of first or second degree murder or involuntary manslaughter and didn't convict on any of them. Unreal. |
|
| Author: | conns7901 [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
FavreFan wrote: So why the not guilty verdict? IIRC didn't he admit he was the one who shot her, just that it was an accident or some shit? How is that not involuntary manslaughter? To stick it to Trump. Her family should sue SF for letting the guy out of custody even thought the FEDs asked them to hold him for deportation. http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/30/us/kate-s ... index.html Quote: Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, 45, was acquitted of murder and involuntary manslaughter charges, as well as assault with a deadly weapon. Jurors convicted the Mexican citizen of being a felon in possession of a firearm.
|
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Jury had the option of first or second degree murder or involuntary manslaughter and didn't convict on any of them. Unreal. So is it the jury's position that there is reasonable doubt he shot her? How would that even be possible? Something's missing here. |
|
| Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Jury had the option of first or second degree murder or involuntary manslaughter and didn't convict on any of them. Unreal. Yeah, didn't even see the manslaughter charge. This is galling, holy shit. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
conns7901 wrote: FavreFan wrote: So why the not guilty verdict? IIRC didn't he admit he was the one who shot her, just that it was an accident or some shit? How is that not involuntary manslaughter? To stick it to Trump. Her family should sue SF for letting the guy out of custody even thought the FEDs asked them to hold him for deportation. http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/30/us/kate-s ... index.html Quote: Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, 45, was acquitted of murder and involuntary manslaughter charges, as well as assault with a deadly weapon. Jurors convicted the Mexican citizen of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Gotta love sanctuary cities . |
|
| Author: | SpiralStairs [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
What was the evidence that was presented? |
|
| Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
FavreFan wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Jury had the option of first or second degree murder or involuntary manslaughter and didn't convict on any of them. Unreal. So is it the jury's position that there is reasonable doubt he shot her? How would that even be possible? Something's missing here. Taking the "a human being can't be illegal" thing a bit too far. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
SpiralStairs wrote: What was the evidence that was presented? Evidence, schmevidence. Alright .... (a) someone fill me in on what this is all about; and, (b) what in the flying fuck is "thot"? |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Don Tiny wrote: SpiralStairs wrote: What was the evidence that was presented? Evidence, schmevidence. Alright .... (a) someone fill me in on what this is all about; and, (b) what in the flying fuck is "thot"? Throw it in your Google machine. |
|
| Author: | tommy [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
He was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Wow.... |
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Don Tiny wrote: SpiralStairs wrote: What was the evidence that was presented? Evidence, schmevidence. Alright .... (a) someone fill me in on what this is all about; and, (b) what in the flying fuck is "thot"? (a) an unfortunate death of a young woman who possibly had nitwits policing and and prosecuting it. Much to the chagrin of Bill O'Reilly. And (b) the latest slang word discovered by people who talk about "street cred" |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
He probably feared for his life. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
tommy wrote: He was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Wow.... I’m sure that will make it extremely difficult for him to enter the country illegally for the 6th time . |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Call me inhumane but I will go with my boilerplate he should not have been in the country. Someone must be liable and eventually will pay. |
|
| Author: | conns7901 [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: He probably feared for his life. Yup. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
The defense that I heard was that he found the gun and picked it up and it went off in his hand (hey buddy). I'm unsure how that isn't involuntary manslaughter. I thought the plan all along was to get that as the charge. |
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: He probably feared for his life. Indeed! |
|
| Author: | tommy [ Thu Nov 30, 2017 9:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kate Steinle verdict |
pittmike wrote: Call me inhumane but I will go with my boilerplate he should not have been in the country. Someone must be liable and eventually will pay. I'm just really not sure why that would be such a controversial stance....but I know people who would likely argue with that or call you biased, etc. |
|
| Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|