Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Nunes Memo https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=110661 |
Page 1 of 7 |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Nunes Memo |
https://www.axios.com/read-the-nunes-memo-unredacted-b4531cc7-5e82-4c63-b48d-5c93132f42ef.html |
Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Wouldn't be the first time someone applied for a warrant using only information that would get them that warrant. Why would anyone put in information that would lead to the warrant not being issued. A bit disconcerting that a Yahoo News article is good enough for a FISA warrant, though. |
Author: | America [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
if everyone who gives a fuck about this russia/fbi/comey/mueller garbage just dropped dead the world would get so much better its really hard to describe. |
Author: | '77Cubs [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Steve Milloy Retweeted Tom Fitton Verified account @TomFitton 10m10 minutes ago Memo: No FISA warrant without Dossier. Which means no Russia collusion story without Dossier. Which means no Mueller special counsel without Dossier paid for by Clinton/DNC. Shut it down. |
Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Sally Yates? Check Andrew McCabe? Check DNC? Check ![]() ![]() |
Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
'77Cubs wrote: Steve Milloy Retweeted Tom Fitton Verified account @TomFitton 10m10 minutes ago Memo: No FISA warrant without Dossier. Which means no Russia collusion story without Dossier. Which means no Mueller special counsel without Dossier paid for by Clinton/DNC. Shut it down. ![]() |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Pablum. Says absolutely nothing as to the origins of the basis to find surveillance of Carter Page proper and continued from it's beginnings in 2013. Pure politics. But you really wonder about Carter Page's real role in the campaign and how his company is funded. Money laundering anyone? |
Author: | Brick [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
So basically Trump is innocent? |
Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: So basically Trump is innocent? As the mind of a young child! ONWARD TO 2020 |
Author: | America [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: So basically Trump is innocent? there was nothing for him to be guilty of to begin with. it was all bullshit, even this stupid memo is bullshit. |
Author: | Nas [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Regular Reader wrote: Pablum. Says absolutely nothing as to the origins of the basis to find surveillance of Carter Page proper and continued from it's beginnings in 2013. Pure politics. But you really wonder about Carter Page's real role in the campaign and how his company is funded. Money laundering anyone? They extended the warrant like 4 times. Carter Page is either the dumbest person in America or a criminal. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Quote: The dossier compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law ?rm Perkins Coie and research ?rm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump?s ties to Russia. a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or. any party/campaign in funding Steele?s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior and FBI officials. Bye bye, Rod. |
Author: | Baby McNown [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
This thread is gonna be awesome. It'll be like watching The Five only with dumber more partisan panelists. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Nas wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Pablum. Says absolutely nothing as to the origins of the basis to find surveillance of Carter Page proper and continued from it's beginnings in 2013. Pure politics. But you really wonder about Carter Page's real role in the campaign and how his company is funded. Money laundering anyone? They extended the warrant like 4 times. Carter Page is either the dumbest person in America or a criminal. Do you really not see the issue here? Each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause, and Rod Rosenstein approved an application that used the DNC-funded dossier as that "reasonable amount of suspicion" but didn't tell the FISC judge about it. That's absolutely unnerving. People can dig up dirt on you and present it to the DOJ who can put it on a secret application to a secret court to surveil you. |
Author: | America [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
i mean they'll just spy on your anyway. this isn't breaking news. did anyone reasonably doubt that Trump was being spied on since his first presidential try like a decade ago? |
Author: | Pal [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Wow. Who will be the first person named in this to blow their brains out today? |
Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Pal wrote: Wow. Who will be the first person named in this to blow their brains out today? The person with the most dirt on HRC |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Good memo today. |
Author: | donspiracy [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Well, this memo certainly won't end the investigation. Rod Rosenstein getting fired won't end the investigation. If this special counsel is BS, why are people pleading guilty to the charges? |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Nas wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Pablum. Says absolutely nothing as to the origins of the basis to find surveillance of Carter Page proper and continued from it's beginnings in 2013. Pure politics. But you really wonder about Carter Page's real role in the campaign and how his company is funded. Money laundering anyone? They extended the warrant like 4 times. Carter Page is either the dumbest person in America or a criminal. Do you really not see the issue here? Each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause, and Rod Rosenstein approved an application that used the DNC-funded dossier as that "reasonable amount of suspicion" but didn't tell the FISC judge about it. That's absolutely unnerving. People can dig up dirt on you and present it to the DOJ who can put it on a secret application to a secret court to surveil you. He's been under FBI counterintelligence investigation since 2013 and actively spoke against American policy here and in Russia for years, but this simplistic memo encourages MANY to ignore that. If the actual surveillance petition was between 100-400 pages long (& the Steele dossier is only 32 pages)what's missing from this fraud, and why are you so willing to ignore it? |
Author: | Peter Puck [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Regular Reader wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Nas wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Pablum. Says absolutely nothing as to the origins of the basis to find surveillance of Carter Page proper and continued from it's beginnings in 2013. Pure politics. But you really wonder about Carter Page's real role in the campaign and how his company is funded. Money laundering anyone? They extended the warrant like 4 times. Carter Page is either the dumbest person in America or a criminal. Do you really not see the issue here? Each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause, and Rod Rosenstein approved an application that used the DNC-funded dossier as that "reasonable amount of suspicion" but didn't tell the FISC judge about it. That's absolutely unnerving. People can dig up dirt on you and present it to the DOJ who can put it on a secret application to a secret court to surveil you. He's been under FBI counterintelligence investigation since 2013 and actively spoke against American policy here and in Russia for years, but this simplistic memo encourages MANY to ignore that. If the actual surveillance petition was between 100-400 pages long (& the Steele dossier is only 32 pages)what's missing from this fraud, and why are you so willing to ignore it? You'd think people would want to read the Dem memo pointing out the problems with this memo, but those people apparently do not post here. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Nas wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Pablum. Says absolutely nothing as to the origins of the basis to find surveillance of Carter Page proper and continued from it's beginnings in 2013. Pure politics. But you really wonder about Carter Page's real role in the campaign and how his company is funded. Money laundering anyone? They extended the warrant like 4 times. Carter Page is either the dumbest person in America or a criminal. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/29/us/politics/fisa-surveillance-applications-how-they-work.html Under the law, FISA orders targeting Americans are good for 90 days, but extensions “may be granted on the same basis as an original order.” The application, however, must consist of newly produced findings that the standards are met rather than merely recycling the previously signed documents. |
Author: | Dignified Rube [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
The biggest joke of all this is that Carter Page came under suspicion for being a Russian agent in the first place. Far too dumb. He failed his PhD thesis TWICE. I don't know how he is an expert at anything, let alone Russia. In television interviews I've seen with him, he can hardly put a sentence together. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Regular Reader wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Nas wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Pablum. Says absolutely nothing as to the origins of the basis to find surveillance of Carter Page proper and continued from it's beginnings in 2013. Pure politics. But you really wonder about Carter Page's real role in the campaign and how his company is funded. Money laundering anyone? They extended the warrant like 4 times. Carter Page is either the dumbest person in America or a criminal. Do you really not see the issue here? Each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause, and Rod Rosenstein approved an application that used the DNC-funded dossier as that "reasonable amount of suspicion" but didn't tell the FISC judge about it. That's absolutely unnerving. People can dig up dirt on you and present it to the DOJ who can put it on a secret application to a secret court to surveil you. He's been under FBI counterintelligence investigation since 2013 and actively spoke against American policy here and in Russia for years, but this simplistic memo encourages MANY to ignore that. If the actual surveillance petition was between 100-400 pages long (& the Steele dossier is only 32 pages)what's missing from this fraud, and why are you so willing to ignore it? Why are you so willing to ignore the central issue here? It is NOT that the FBI lacked sufficient evidence to investigate or otherwise substantiate probable cause, that IS. NOT. THE. ISSUE. HERE. The fact that Steele's dossier was presented to the FISC judge without the caveat that the dossier was opposition research for a political campaign, and the guy who signed off on one of those applications is presently presiding over the independent counsel and approving all of his actions IS. THE. ISSUE. HERE. |
Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Peter Puck wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Nas wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Pablum. Says absolutely nothing as to the origins of the basis to find surveillance of Carter Page proper and continued from it's beginnings in 2013. Pure politics. But you really wonder about Carter Page's real role in the campaign and how his company is funded. Money laundering anyone? They extended the warrant like 4 times. Carter Page is either the dumbest person in America or a criminal. Do you really not see the issue here? Each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause, and Rod Rosenstein approved an application that used the DNC-funded dossier as that "reasonable amount of suspicion" but didn't tell the FISC judge about it. That's absolutely unnerving. People can dig up dirt on you and present it to the DOJ who can put it on a secret application to a secret court to surveil you. He's been under FBI counterintelligence investigation since 2013 and actively spoke against American policy here and in Russia for years, but this simplistic memo encourages MANY to ignore that. If the actual surveillance petition was between 100-400 pages long (& the Steele dossier is only 32 pages)what's missing from this fraud, and why are you so willing to ignore it? You'd think people would want to read the Dem memo pointing out the problems with this memo, but those people apparently do not post here. What are you? Gay? |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
And now they're reporting that this memo was written by some aide named Patel who apparently has an ax to grind for not being granted security clearance to go work for the NSA, leaving him stuck in the hellhole he perceived his job to be at the DOJ. I say investigate this pissant! |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Nas wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Pablum. Says absolutely nothing as to the origins of the basis to find surveillance of Carter Page proper and continued from it's beginnings in 2013. Pure politics. But you really wonder about Carter Page's real role in the campaign and how his company is funded. Money laundering anyone? They extended the warrant like 4 times. Carter Page is either the dumbest person in America or a criminal. Do you really not see the issue here? Each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause, and Rod Rosenstein approved an application that used the DNC-funded dossier as that "reasonable amount of suspicion" but didn't tell the FISC judge about it. That's absolutely unnerving. People can dig up dirt on you and present it to the DOJ who can put it on a secret application to a secret court to surveil you. He's been under FBI counterintelligence investigation since 2013 and actively spoke against American policy here and in Russia for years, but this simplistic memo encourages MANY to ignore that. If the actual surveillance petition was between 100-400 pages long (& the Steele dossier is only 32 pages)what's missing from this fraud, and why are you so willing to ignore it? Why are you so willing to ignore the central issue here? It is NOT that the FBI lacked sufficient evidence to investigate or otherwise substantiate probable cause, that IS. NOT. THE. ISSUE. HERE. The fact that Steele's dossier was presented to the FISC judge without the caveat that the dossier was opposition research for a political campaign, and the guy who signed off on one of those applications is presently presiding over the independent counsel and approving all of his actions IS. THE. ISSUE. HERE. How do you know if the judge raised that concerns himself, or not? Your typically politically motivated assumptions are showing. THE. ISSUE. HERE. IS. COMPLETE. TRANSPARENCY. Not the juvenile cherry picking on display here. |
Author: | donspiracy [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Dignified Rube wrote: I don't know how he is an expert at anything, let alone Russia. In television interviews I've seen with him, he can hardly put a sentence together. That is because he is guilty and nervous about perjuring himself. This investigation is literally going to make the coverup(see: obstruction) worse than the crime. It's not even so much what the Administration did, the focus is going to be lying about the when, where, and with whom. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Peter Puck wrote: You'd think people would want to read the Dem memo pointing out the problems with this memo, but those people apparently do not post here. I'll gladly read it, but unless they have specific evidence that Steele's dossier wasn't presented to the FISC judge and it wasn't mentioned that the dossier was political opposition research funded by an American political part and presidential candidate, nothing is going to change. |
Author: | Caller Bob [ Fri Feb 02, 2018 1:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Nunes Memo |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Good memo today. Yeah. I've got the memo right here, but, uh, uh, I just forgot. But, uh, it's not shipping out until tomorrow, so there's no problem. |
Page 1 of 7 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |