Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Obamagate https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=110771 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Dignified Rube [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Obamagate |
This deserves its own thread, with all the new revelations coming to light. https://twitter.com/search?q=obamagate& ... r%5Esearch |
Author: | Caller Bob [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
Dignified Rube wrote: This deserves its own thread No, it doesn't. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
![]() Just linking to Twitter is awesome. At least Seacrest provided links from news sources. |
Author: | sinicalypse [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
so wait... a president wants to "know everything that's going on" and that's a bad thing? aren't we in the midst of hating trump for being an ignorant shitposter of a made-for-TV president? seriously what the fuck do you people want from your figurehead officials? |
Author: | RFDC [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 5:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
Terry's Peeps wrote: :lol: Just linking to Twitter is awesome. At least Seacrest provided links from news sources. #thatsrube |
Author: | TurdFerguson [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 6:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
Can we all agree that Trump has a tendency to lie? I don't think I'm stepping on a limb with that claim. With that context, so what if Obama lied on Foxnews. I'm on record as saying I'm troubled by Trump's constant lying, at the same time I don't expect any politician to always to be honest. If this is your smoking gun, wtf are you going to do with trump? Also out of 50K texts, they have 2 tied to this. This is a mistress complaining about her job. Also with the deep state coverup, shouldn't she be excited to report to her overload. Why would she be complaining about King D noticing her work. |
Author: | Juiced [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 6:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
TurdFerguson wrote: Can we all agree that Trump has a tendency to lie? I don't think I'm stepping on a limb with that claim. With that context, so what if Obama lied on Foxnews. I'm on record as saying I'm troubled by Trump's constant lying, at the same time I don't expect any politician to always to be honest. If this is your smoking gun, wtf are you going to do with trump? Also out of 50K texts, they have 2 tied to this. This is a mistress complaining about her job. Also with the deep state coverup, shouldn't she be excited to report to her overload. Why would she be complaining about King D noticing her work. It's not a big deal that he lied. It is a big deal what he lied about. The deep state is a real threat to democracy. You can't just turn the other cheek and say, "it is ok, because Trump this and Trump that." Next time it might be against your candidate. |
Author: | TurdFerguson [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 7:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
Does it change your opinion that someone already traced the date on the text to when Obama was meeting with putin and the implied intent of knowing everything was to tell Putin to stop meddling in our election. Think it was in the trump 2 electric boogaloo thread. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 7:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
TurdFerguson wrote: Does it change your opinion that someone already traced the date on the text to when Obama was meeting with putin and the implied intent of knowing everything was to tell Putin to stop meddling in our election. Think it was in the trump 2 electric boogaloo thread. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... ng-n845531 Quote: But it is not clear that the text message between the two refers to the FBI's investigation of Clinton. Johnson's report only says that the text "may relate" to the FBI’s Clinton investigation, since the Justice Department had redacted other text messages that related to other investigations. An earlier text in that sequence refers to the need to develop talking points for Comey in connection with a morning meeting "on the 7th." The text in question was sent just as Obama was preparing to attend an international summit in China, where he would meet face-to-face with Vladimir Putin on Sept. 5. Describing that conversation months later, Obama said he told Putin at that meeting to "cut it out" in relation to attempts to meddle in the U.S. election. They reference talking points for a meeting Comey had with Obama on "the 7th", and Obama met with Putin on the 5th. If they were indeed meaning talking points for Comey to brief POTUS on the Russia investigation for his showdown with Putin on the 5th, why did they think Comey's prep meeting took place two days after the event he's prepping the President on? Also, here is the footnote on the text message itself in the memo: Quote: 78 DOJ-PROD-238. The Justice Department notified the Committee that it had redacted other text messages that were personal in nature or relating to other investigations. See Jan. 19th Boyd letter, supra note 5. Presumably, because this message was not redacted, the Department believes it may relate to the FBI’s investigation of classified information on Secretary Clinton’s private server. The DOJ scrubbed the text messages that related specifically to "other investigations", and if this text message did indeed, or even appeared to, relate to an"other investigation", it would have been redacted by the DOJ, no? |
Author: | sinicalypse [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 7:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
TurdFerguson wrote: This is a mistress complaining about her job. call me old fashioned, but isn't a mistress a pretty good job to have? you get all the spoils of "victory" without having to do the domestic shit like changing diapers... what's there to complain about? at the end of the rollercoaster you get to jump off and get in line for the next "exciting career opportunity" =P |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
![]() |
Author: | RFDC [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 8:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
Don Tiny wrote: ![]() ![]() Is this Franks next trick? |
Author: | Baby McNown [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
![]() |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
RFDC wrote: Don Tiny wrote: ![]() ![]() Is this Franks next trick? No; this thread beat him to it. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 9:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
sinicalypse wrote: so wait... a president wants to "know everything that's going on" and that's a bad thing? Only when Trump does it. |
Author: | Peoria Matt [ Wed Feb 07, 2018 10:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Obamagate |
Seacrest wrote: sinicalypse wrote: so wait... a president wants to "know everything that's going on" and that's a bad thing? Only when Trump does it. Trump honestly doesn't strike me as a President who wants to "know everything that's going on". |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |