Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Sinclair Broadcast Group https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=111785 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Nas [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Sinclair Broadcast Group |
https://www.yahoo.com/news/dan-rather-s ... 04842.html |
Author: | Baby McNown [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
This has been in the news for a few days. I was waiting for one of our totally unbiased and non partisan patriotic Americans to start a thread about it. |
Author: | Rod [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Didn't Dan Rather get fired for making up news? Just sayin'. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Didn't Dan Rather get fired for making up news? Just sayin'. Yes, he did. And then he played the victim card when he was axed. Dan Rather talking about "overlords" is rich... |
Author: | Nas [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Didn't Dan Rather get fired for making up news? Just sayin'. Still says he did nothing wrong. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Seacrest wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Didn't Dan Rather get fired for making up news? Just sayin'. Yes, he did. And then he played the victim card when he was axed. Dan Rather talking about "overlords" is rich... Wasn't Rather axed for statements later proven to be true and questionable (to the Bush family's integrity) about W's part time service protecting Alabama from Tennessee while avoiding Vietnam? |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Baby McNown wrote: This has been in the news for a few days. I was waiting for one of our totally unbiased and non partisan patriotic Americans to start a thread about it. Dead Reagan gifting the fascists from the grave again his deregulation. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Didn't Dan Rather get fired for making up news? Just sayin'. Yes, he did. And then he played the victim card when he was axed. Dan Rather talking about "overlords" is rich... Wasn't Rather axed for statements later proven to be true and questionable (to the Bush family's integrity) about W's part time service protecting Alabama from Tennessee while avoiding Vietnam? He knowingly used a phony document in a story on W. To call Rather a journalist after that, is an insult to actual journalists. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Didn't Dan Rather get fired for making up news? Just sayin'. Yes, he did. And then he played the victim card when he was axed. Dan Rather talking about "overlords" is rich... Wasn't Rather axed for statements later proven to be true and questionable (to the Bush family's integrity) about W's part time service protecting Alabama from Tennessee while avoiding Vietnam? He knowingly used a phony document in a story on W. To call Rather a journalist after that, is an insult to actual journalists. Iirc he got burned by a 3rd party on the document, but the story he ran was still largely accurate. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Didn't Dan Rather get fired for making up news? Just sayin'. Yes, he did. And then he played the victim card when he was axed. Dan Rather talking about "overlords" is rich... Wasn't Rather axed for statements later proven to be true and questionable (to the Bush family's integrity) about W's part time service protecting Alabama from Tennessee while avoiding Vietnam? He knowingly used a phony document in a story on W. To call Rather a journalist after that, is an insult to actual journalists. Iirc he got burned by a 3rd party on the document, but the story he ran was still largely accurate. He got burned by his lack of ethics and journalistic integrity. He has no one to give responsibility to but himself. And to this day, he refuses to accept it his own part in it. |
Author: | hnd [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
the left has been screaming about getting rid of "fake news" for a good solid 18 months. a conservative company makes affiliates read vague statement regarding fake news don't mention trump once and now everyone's in a tizzy. |
Author: | Baby McNown [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Boy it didn't take long to find a way not to discuss Sinclair. I'm impressed. |
Author: | Baby McNown [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
hnd wrote: the left has been screaming about getting rid of "fake news" for a good solid 18 months. a conservative company makes affiliates read vague statement regarding fake news don't mention trump once and now everyone's in a tizzy. Bitch please. If it was 50 some stations all reading a script about we should avoid fake news stories about the Hill Dawg you know exactly what the reaction of the Right would be. And it sure as shit wouldn't be to discredit the source calling them out. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Baby McNown wrote: hnd wrote: the left has been screaming about getting rid of "fake news" for a good solid 18 months. a conservative company makes affiliates read vague statement regarding fake news don't mention trump once and now everyone's in a tizzy. Bitch please. If it was 50 some stations all reading a script about we should avoid fake news stories about the Hill Dawg you know exactly what the reaction of the Right would be. And it sure as shit wouldn't be to discredit the source calling them out. What was the transcript of the statement they all read. I've only seen it referenced as "anti-Fake News" with the anchors saying the practice "threatens our democracy" which is something I'm pretty sure Dems have been clutching their pearls over for more than a year. Because yes, given how the statements were framed in the piece linked, outrage at the statement from Dems seems incredibly hypocritical. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Baby McNown wrote: This has been in the news for a few days. I was waiting for one of our totally unbiased and non partisan patriotic Americans to start a thread about it. I posted it in the complain about thread. viewtopic.php?f=47&t=99631&p=2937428#p2937370 |
Author: | hnd [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Baby McNown wrote: hnd wrote: the left has been screaming about getting rid of "fake news" for a good solid 18 months. a conservative company makes affiliates read vague statement regarding fake news don't mention trump once and now everyone's in a tizzy. Bitch please. If it was 50 some stations all reading a script about we should avoid fake news stories about the Hill Dawg you know exactly what the reaction of the Right would be. And it sure as shit wouldn't be to discredit the source calling them out. i don't know why you are making it about politics. its about standard ethics in reporting the news. |
Author: | Baby McNown [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
If you are going to pretend this isn't about politics then stop posting. |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 5:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Baby McNown wrote: If you are going to pretend this isn't about politics then stop posting. Did the statements say "Fake News targeting the President" or "targeting our government" or "the Republican Party" or anything like that? I haven't seen any political quotes pulled from it. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: What was the transcript of the statement they all read. I've only seen it referenced as "anti-Fake News" with the anchors saying the practice "threatens our democracy" which is something I'm pretty sure Dems have been clutching their pearls over for more than a year. Because yes, given how the statements were framed in the piece linked, outrage at the statement from Dems seems incredibly hypocritical. https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/article/KOMO-fake-news-Sinclair-promos-12792032.phpl Quote: "Hi, I'm(A) ____________, and I'm (B) _________________...
(B) Our greatest responsibility is to serve our Northwest communities. We are extremely proud of the quality, balanced journalism that KOMO News produces. (A) But we're concerned about the troubling trend of irresponsible, one sided news stories plaguing our country. The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media. (B) More alarming, some media outlets publish these same fake stories... stories that just aren't true, without checking facts first. (A) Unfortunately, some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control 'exactly what people think'...This is extremely dangerous to a democracy. (B) At KOMO it's our responsibility to pursue and report the truth. We understand Truth is neither politically 'left nor right.' Our commitment to factual reporting is the foundation of our credibility, now more than ever. (A) But we are human and sometimes our reporting might fall short. If you believe our coverage is unfair please reach out to us by going to KOMOnews.com and clicking on CONTENT CONCERNS. We value your comments. We will respond back to you. (B) We work very hard to seek the truth and strive to be fair, balanced and factual... We consider it our honor, our privilege to responsibly deliver the news every day. (A) Thank you for watching and we appreciate your feedback" |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 6:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Kirkwood wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: What was the transcript of the statement they all read. I've only seen it referenced as "anti-Fake News" with the anchors saying the practice "threatens our democracy" which is something I'm pretty sure Dems have been clutching their pearls over for more than a year. Because yes, given how the statements were framed in the piece linked, outrage at the statement from Dems seems incredibly hypocritical. https://www.seattlepi.com/seattlenews/article/KOMO-fake-news-Sinclair-promos-12792032.phpl Quote: "Hi, I'm(A) ____________, and I'm (B) _________________... (B) Our greatest responsibility is to serve our Northwest communities. We are extremely proud of the quality, balanced journalism that KOMO News produces. (A) But we're concerned about the troubling trend of irresponsible, one sided news stories plaguing our country. The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media. (B) More alarming, some media outlets publish these same fake stories... stories that just aren't true, without checking facts first. (A) Unfortunately, some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control 'exactly what people think'...This is extremely dangerous to a democracy. (B) At KOMO it's our responsibility to pursue and report the truth. We understand Truth is neither politically 'left nor right.' Our commitment to factual reporting is the foundation of our credibility, now more than ever. (A) But we are human and sometimes our reporting might fall short. If you believe our coverage is unfair please reach out to us by going to KOMOnews.com and clicking on CONTENT CONCERNS. We value your comments. We will respond back to you. (B) We work very hard to seek the truth and strive to be fair, balanced and factual... We consider it our honor, our privilege to responsibly deliver the news every day. (A) Thank you for watching and we appreciate your feedback" So, uh...pretty unbiased. Like, not at all biased, with no hint of bias or political leaning. Baby, your response? |
Author: | pittmike [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 6:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Give him a minute I’m sure that’s the first he has seen of it. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 6:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Yea, I don't think anyone with a functioning brain should trust 202 news stations vomiting this garbage. Newscasts can say whatever they want: FOX New - "Fair and Balanced" CNN - "The Most Trusted Name in News" etc etc etc Use common sense and turn off bullshit when it begins to talk. |
Author: | Chet Coppock's Fur Coat [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 6:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
I don't mind the message. I do think that it should have been an editorial read by preferably the corporate chairman, or at least the station manager. I am old enough to remember when all the local news channels here ran editorials. Mary Laney used to do Channel 5's, and I think at one point Andy Shaw might have read the ones for Channel 7. When local anchors read editorials, it should be their opinion, not their manager's opinion. |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 6:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
The words seem innocuous on paper until you parse them as coming from Sinclair. We know where they stand. Then it's clear that when they talk about "members of the media [using] their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda," they're not talking about Alex Jones or Laura Ingraham. I think it's interesting that the video was a Deadspin production. I thought they started Splinter to abandon the charade of still having Gawker but hiding all the Gawker writers inside Deadspin, Gizmodo, and Jezebel. Maybe it was a conscious decision to show that no one will, nay, can merely STICK TO SPORTS. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 6:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Baby McNown wrote: If you are going to pretend this isn't about politics then stop posting. You ever thought about, I dunno, being a little less aggressive on the board? |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 6:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Baby McNown wrote: If you are going to pretend this isn't about politics then stop posting. If you are convinced that it's about politics with no mention of politics in their statement, will you please post that pic of yourself wearing your favorite tinfoil hat? |
Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 6:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Just know that I initially thought to repost the still image from the deleted Facebook Live video as the "only BMac picture I want to see", but I didn't. Too much class. |
Author: | Spaulding [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 7:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
I read it as more people are looking at social media, we are losing viewers, please stay tuned to us. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 7:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
Spaulding wrote: I read it as more people are looking at social media, we are losing viewers, please stay tuned to us. That's how people who don't see everyone and everything as a political pawn see it. |
Author: | Spaulding [ Tue Apr 03, 2018 7:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sinclair Broadcast Group |
How biased are they typically? |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |