Buffalo would cover that in first half. 60 to 75 percent of the current Alabama players wont even make an NFL roster.

60 to 75% of Buffalo's offense shouldn't be on an NFL roster either.

There are levels to all of this. Nathan Peterman had two very good years at Pitt. He sucks as a pro, but was solid in college.

Compare what he did to what Tua is doing now. It's different universes.

Buffalo would cover that in first half. 60 to 75 percent of the current Alabama players wont even make an NFL roster.

I'm talking about in college

That still leaves between 21 and 33 that will make an NFL roster. And as FF said, most of the buffalo offense shouldn't be there either.

I just love this Vegas stunt.

Well the Bills have 53 players who have made an NFL roster. Alabama has 50-60 players on scholarship who will never be good enough to make a team like the Bills.

The only reason I'm taking the Bills by 3 TDs or so is because they have a good defense and that would decide the game.

Throw Buffalo's offense with Oakland's defense straight up vs Alabama and make Gruden the coach of the pro team and I'll take Alabama to win. If Peterman is starting I'll take Alabama to win by 6+. And I generally think the worst pro teams would destroy the best college teams but this Bills offense has a legit claim to worst NFL offense in the modern era.

Well the Bills have 53 players who have made an NFL roster. Alabama has 50-60 players on scholarship who will never be good enough to make a team like the Bills.

They don't really even play the same sport. Bills would beat them by 50 , at a minimum.

This reminds me of the argument people make about how UConn could win games against men's college teams when in actuality they would struggle to beat any high school team in the Sun-Times Super 25. Even dog shit NFL players were very good college players and would have been good enough to start at Alabama in most cases.

They're also smaller or slower, or both, and have less experience playing the game. The Bills' lines would bully Bama's lines, and the receivers would run right over Bama's secondary.

I see what you are saying RR, but, and correct me if I am wrong, didn't those UCLA teams have crazy size and power? Not just Kareem/Lew and Walton, but a string of 6-6 to 6-8 guys with power....Marques, Wicks...I know Jamaal Wilkes wasn't a power guy, but he had decent size. That big Sven guy from Denmark or whatever....man, they had size. Would have love to have seen them play. Could have beat some of the shitty ABA/NBA teams?

Iirc only Sidney Wicks was on the freshman team. But they all were string bean 17-18 year olds.

Oh, ok. So could they have beat an ABA/NBA team?

I just remembered RR is a LSU guy. My only ally here is hopelessly biased! Damnit.