Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Wake up Call. https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=115251 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | Matt Murton's Beard [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 3:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Wake up Call. |
Enough. Enough.. Leave the politics out of it. Talk to your friends about it. This isn't the place for the struggle. We all struggle. Take your back and forth about politics and agree that you won't ever agree. Gentlemen, this is the best Bears team we have seen in almost 10 years. Sunday is our next day, be happy - The Bears are Superbowl bound. We need you. Carry them. -MMB |
Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 5:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Matt Murton's Beard wrote: Enough. Enough.. Leave the politics out of it. Talk to your friends about it. This isn't the place for the struggle. We all struggle. Take your back and forth about politics and agree that you won't ever agree. Gentlemen, this is the best Bears team we have seen in almost 10 years. Sunday is our next day, be happy - The Bears are Superbowl bound. We need you. Carry them. -MMB With all this good 76ers and Cav news you want to talk Bears? Pssh Insert witty Jbills gif |
Author: | Jbi11s [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 6:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Author: | 312player [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 9:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Best bear team in 30 years. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 9:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
312player wrote: Best bear team in 30 years. You realize they played in the Super Bowl 12 years ago, right?This Bears team is very good, should get better, and has the potential for something special. I'm having a blast watching them, but they haven't won anything yet so lets just pump the brakes a little bit here. |
Author: | Nas [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 9:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
312player wrote: Best bear team in 30 years. I agree. I know what the Lovie teams did but this team would beat them by 2 touchdowns. |
Author: | Matt Murton's Beard [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Frank Coztansa wrote: 312player wrote: Best bear team in 30 years. You realize they played in the Super Bowl 12 years ago, right?This Bears team is very good, should get better, and has the potential for something special. I'm having a blast watching them, but they haven't won anything yet so lets just pump the brakes a little bit here. I agree Frank, we need to cool it a bit. The NFC has clearly the 2 best teams in football. This defense is special, the Rams game IF (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky plays will give us a good check on our thermometer on how far we can go. Nagy doesn't give 2-fucks nor Pace, they're playing with house money now - ball's in the Saints and Rams court. We are a year early and can break up the story line for both teams. |
Author: | Nas [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
(Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky needs to play against the Giants if he's going to play against the Rams. He's not good enough yet to take 3 weeks off and still play well against the 2nd best team in the NFC. |
Author: | Matt Murton's Beard [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Nas wrote: (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky needs to play against the Giants if he's going to play against the Rams. He's not good enough yet to take 3 weeks off and still play well against the 2nd best team in the NFC. Nas, we don't need to test the Rams now. If anything throw the game and play Daniel. They're not getting homefield why show them anything? Rest everyone against the Rams and get blown out. It won't matter. We will be playing one of those two teams at home and Nagy has weeks of preparation for the play calling with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. Lose and don't show your hand. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Frank Coztansa wrote: 312player wrote: Best bear team in 30 years. You realize they played in the Super Bowl 12 years ago, right?This Bears team is very good, should get better, and has the potential for something special. I'm having a blast watching them, but they haven't won anything yet so lets just pump the brakes a little bit here. Not sure why but it seems like most Bear fans on here have zero respect for that 2006 team. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
The D on those 2005-2006 Bears teams was just as good as this years. The lack of respect comes from Rex, but that doesn't take away how good that the Defense, Offensive line, and Thomas Jones all were that year. Nas wrote: (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky needs to play against the Giants if he's going to play against the Rams. He's not good enough yet to take 3 weeks off and still play well against the 2nd best team in the NFC. Bear Weather will be the great equalizer my friend.
|
Author: | Drunk Squirrel [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
To me it’s a stylistic thing between the 06 bears and this year. I’ve had similar feelings that this team is better but I think the defensive philosophy is more entertaining to me.. this could be because they’ve been shitty for the last 4 years with several mediocre at best years before that. Or just recency bias. Or I’m drunk during the games. That said, yesterday’s game reminded me way too much of the Krenzel and early Orton games. With out a running game. |
Author: | Matt Murton's Beard [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Frank Coztansa wrote: The D on those 2005-2006 Bears teams was just as good as this years. The lack of respect comes from Rex, but that doesn't take away how good that the Defense, Offensive line, and Thomas Jones all were that year. Nas wrote: (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky needs to play against the Giants if he's going to play against the Rams. He's not good enough yet to take 3 weeks off and still play well against the 2nd best team in the NFC. Bear Weather will be the great equalizer my friend.Irene, the weather girl: "It's Cold Realllll Cold" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBgDGbBFkkg |
Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. Glad Nas is in full meatball mode though. He's earned it after those lean Trestman/Fox years. |
Author: | Matt Murton's Beard [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
FavreFan wrote: The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. Glad Nas is in full meatball mode though. He's earned it after those lean Trestman/Fox years. Hold on, wait. Let me finish. Let me finish. Same guy gushing on Nagy. You mad bro? |
Author: | Darkside [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 10:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
FavreFan wrote: The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. Glad Nas is in full meatball mode though. He's earned it after those lean Trestman/Fox years. When we're debating whether the 06 team beats the 18 team... which NFL rules are we following... the 06 or 18 cause in my mind that's a difference maker. |
Author: | newper [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 11:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
The '06 was opportunistic defense with a few playmakers, this one is more smothering with a few playmakers. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
FavreFan wrote: The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. You are 100% correct here. And if he never got injured, Tommie Harris would have made people clamor for HOF status. |
Author: | Matt Murton's Beard [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Seacrest wrote: FavreFan wrote: The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. You are 100% correct here. And if he never got injured, Tommie Harris would have made people clamor for HOF status. This is a bad thought Rozecrest. Mack is better than 4 players on that '06 D - Tommie Harris DID get injured. You really want to reminisce on that team? Hester was magic Urlacher in his prime but really Harris? This Defense is already one of the greatest and they are all under 28 years old. |
Author: | tommy [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Nas wrote: 312player wrote: Best bear team in 30 years. I agree. I know what the Lovie teams did but this team would beat them by 2 touchdowns. Holy shit. I hope you're kidding. That's way off. Bears could have gone to another Super Bowl in 2011 if Cutler didn't get hurt. |
Author: | tommy [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
FavreFan wrote: The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. Glad Nas is in full meatball mode though. He's earned it after those lean Trestman/Fox years. A dose of sanity, this post is. "Bear weather" isn't a thing. I can't tell if you guys are kidding or not. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
I hope that MMB is kidding. If we have two people here with the intelligence level of Caller Bob, we might as well back up the truck. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Matt Murton's Beard wrote: Seacrest wrote: FavreFan wrote: The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. You are 100% correct here. And if he never got injured, Tommie Harris would have made people clamor for HOF status. This is a bad thought Rozecrest. Mack is better than 4 players on that '06 D - Tommie Harris DID get injured. You really want to reminisce on that team? Hester was magic Urlacher in his prime but really Harris? This Defense is already one of the greatest and they are all under 28 years old. Tommie Harris was awesome when healthy. |
Author: | Matt Murton's Beard [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
tommy wrote: FavreFan wrote: The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. Glad Nas is in full meatball mode though. He's earned it after those lean Trestman/Fox years. A dose of sanity, this post is. "Bear weather" isn't a thing. I can't tell if you guys are kidding or not. Bears weather is a thing for Drew Brees, we will have to play them in the dome to win. Brees is desperate to establish his legacy, why do you think they go for it on 4th & 6th up by 31 points on the Eagles? The Saints are the team to set your eyes to, Rams - not so much. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Brees legacy is set. A second SB would just be the cherry on top. |
Author: | tommy [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 12:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Matt Murton's Beard wrote: tommy wrote: FavreFan wrote: The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. Glad Nas is in full meatball mode though. He's earned it after those lean Trestman/Fox years. A dose of sanity, this post is. "Bear weather" isn't a thing. I can't tell if you guys are kidding or not. Bears weather is a thing for Drew Brees, we will have to play them in the dome to win. Brees is desperate to establish his legacy, why do you think they go for it on 4th & 6th up by 31 points on the Eagles? The Saints are the team to set your eyes to, Rams - not so much. No. It don't exist. It's the worst Ditka-ism ever. Simply being outdoors might be more of a challenge for Brees, but that isn't Bear weather. 49ers 28, Bears 3 |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 1:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
tommy wrote: Matt Murton's Beard wrote: tommy wrote: FavreFan wrote: The 06 defense would feast on this 2nd year version of Mitch and special teams would give the 06 team the edge. The idea this Bears team would win by 14 when they can't even beat this year's Vikings Packers and Lions by that much is ludicrous. Glad Nas is in full meatball mode though. He's earned it after those lean Trestman/Fox years. A dose of sanity, this post is. "Bear weather" isn't a thing. I can't tell if you guys are kidding or not. Bears weather is a thing for Drew Brees, we will have to play them in the dome to win. Brees is desperate to establish his legacy, why do you think they go for it on 4th & 6th up by 31 points on the Eagles? The Saints are the team to set your eyes to, Rams - not so much. No. It don't exist. It's the worst Ditka-ism ever. Simply being outdoors might be more of a challenge for Brees, but that isn't Bear weather. 49ers 28, Bears 3 The gays from SF had no problem with BEARS |
Author: | Matt Murton's Beard [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 1:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Frank Coztansa wrote: I hope that MMB is kidding. If we have two people here with the intelligence level of Caller Bob, we might as well back up the truck. Frank, long time lurker, long time friend. What are you referring to? At least back up your point about something instead of making an ambiguous insult about my intelligence. No offense taken. If you want to debate, then debate. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 1:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
You have called this Bears defense- which has won eight regular season games to this point- "one of the greatest," extolled the virtues of Bear Weather, and said that one of the best QBs ever needs to cement his legacy all in the last few posts in this thread. Its right there for ya, nothing ambiguous about it. |
Author: | Matt Murton's Beard [ Fri Nov 23, 2018 1:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wake up Call. |
Frank Coztansa wrote: You have called this Bears defense- which has won eight regular season games to this point- "one of the greatest," extolled the virtues of Bear Weather, and said that one of the best QBs ever needs to cement his legacy all in the last few posts in this thread. Its right there for ya, nothing ambiguous about it. So I'm sorry, let me get this straight. 8-3 now. I never said (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is the best QB's ever, re-read the thread Frank. And I never said "Bear Weather" as I said we are playing in a dome against the Saints? So who you crapping? Are you even trying anymore or just bla·sé posting because you're board at work? Work on the Penske file a little harder kid. |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |