Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Is this legal?
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=120797		 Page 1 of 11
Author:  Darkside [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Is this legal?
From WGN

CHICAGO — Illinois now has 32 cases of COVID-19, including a young child in Chicago, officials announced Thursday.

Quote:
All events that are estimated to have 250 or more, private or public, should be canceled or postponed until May 1, Gov. JB Pritzker announced in a said.

The governor mandated that all events of 1,000 or more are canceled immediately. Pritzker said officials will use force to break up any events in the state over 1,000 people.


Sounds like a suspension of the 1st amendment. Can this be legal?
Author:  Rod [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Darkside wrote:
From WGN

CHICAGO — Illinois now has 32 cases of COVID-19, including a young child in Chicago, officials announced Thursday.

Quote:
All events that are estimated to have 250 or more, private or public, should be canceled or postponed until May 1, Gov. JB Pritzker announced in a said.

The governor mandated that all events of 1,000 or more are canceled immediately. Pritzker said officials will use force to break up any events in the state over 1,000 people.


Sounds like a suspension of the 1st amendment. Can this be legal?


Obviously not. Thank God some of us have weapons.
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Darkside wrote:
From WGN

CHICAGO — Illinois now has 32 cases of COVID-19, including a young child in Chicago, officials announced Thursday.

Quote:
All events that are estimated to have 250 or more, private or public, should be canceled or postponed until May 1, Gov. JB Pritzker announced in a said.

The governor mandated that all events of 1,000 or more are canceled immediately. Pritzker said officials will use force to break up any events in the state over 1,000 people.


Sounds like a suspension of the 1st amendment. Can this be legal?


Obviously not. Thank God some of us have weapons.


Dats exactly right!
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Darkside wrote:
From WGN

CHICAGO — Illinois now has 32 cases of COVID-19, including a young child in Chicago, officials announced Thursday.

Quote:
All events that are estimated to have 250 or more, private or public, should be canceled or postponed until May 1, Gov. JB Pritzker announced in a said.

The governor mandated that all events of 1,000 or more are canceled immediately. Pritzker said officials will use force to break up any events in the state over 1,000 people.


Sounds like a suspension of the 1st amendment. Can this be legal?


Should is the key word.
Author:  Caller Bob [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Darkside wrote:
From WGN

CHICAGO — Illinois now has 32 cases of COVID-19, including a young child in Chicago, officials announced Thursday.

Quote:
All events that are estimated to have 250 or more, private or public, should be canceled or postponed until May 1, Gov. JB Pritzker announced in a said.

The governor mandated that all events of 1,000 or more are canceled immediately. Pritzker said officials will use force to break up any events in the state over 1,000 people.


Sounds like a suspension of the 1st amendment. Can this be legal?


Are you serious?
Author:  Rod [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Caller Bob wrote:
Darkside wrote:
From WGN

CHICAGO — Illinois now has 32 cases of COVID-19, including a young child in Chicago, officials announced Thursday.

Quote:
All events that are estimated to have 250 or more, private or public, should be canceled or postponed until May 1, Gov. JB Pritzker announced in a said.

The governor mandated that all events of 1,000 or more are canceled immediately. Pritzker said officials will use force to break up any events in the state over 1,000 people.


Sounds like a suspension of the 1st amendment. Can this be legal?


Are you serious?



You really think fat Pritzker has the authority to halt our free assembly? And threaten force to do it? This is EXACTLY why we have the Second Amendment and an armed citizenry is critical. I don't give a flying fuck whether his intentions are "good".
Author:  Darkside [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
From WGN

CHICAGO — Illinois now has 32 cases of COVID-19, including a young child in Chicago, officials announced Thursday.

Quote:
All events that are estimated to have 250 or more, private or public, should be canceled or postponed until May 1, Gov. JB Pritzker announced in a said.

The governor mandated that all events of 1,000 or more are canceled immediately. Pritzker said officials will use force to break up any events in the state over 1,000 people.


Sounds like a suspension of the 1st amendment. Can this be legal?


Should is the key word.

He didn't say they should use force to break up events. He said they will.
Author:  Caller Bob [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
He's not the only one to do it. And yes, the government does have the authority to do this in an emergency.
Author:  Rod [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Caller Bob wrote:
He's not the only one to do it. And yes, the government does have the authority to do this in an emergency.


:lol: No. That's why we have a Constitution. Government will fuck you straight up the ass and use "emergency" as the reason to do so.
Author:  Darkside [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Caller Bob wrote:
He's not the only one to do it. And yes, the government does have the authority to do this in an emergency.

Yeah... I'm not so sure. And this isn't an emergency.
Author:  Spaulding [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
No he doesn't. But he's doing something, he's protecting us, he cares unlike that guy in the white house.

It's stupid why does it matter if it's a 1000. Why not 100? They aren't closing DG South as far as I know.
Author:  Caller Bob [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
You guys should take up arms and overthrow JP Pritzker.
Author:  Rod [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Did you know that it's impossible to contract the virus in a crowd of 250 or less? But if it's 251, you're gonna catch it for sure.

Seriously, when you hear stuff like this it makes you wonder what's really going on.
Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Caller bob is dumb but correct

I’ll let juices lecture notes explain why to you
Author:  Spaulding [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Did you know that it's impossible to contract the virus in a crowd of 250 or less? But if it's 251, you're gonna catch it for sure.

Seriously, when you hear stuff like this it makes you wonder what's really going on.


Yeah. I can't figure it out.
Author:  beni hanna [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Caller Bob wrote:
You guys should take up arms and overthrow JP Pritzker.

You post like a foreigner. Whereabouts is you frum?
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Gonna contract COVID-19 to own Pritzker.
Author:  Darkside [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
good dolphin wrote:
Caller bob is dumb but correct

I’ll let juices lecture notes explain why to you

Which other fundamental rights are eligible for suspension? Can they refuse a speedy trial because a judge can be exposed to someone on trial who has been exposed to thousands in jail? Can we suspend the election because changing leadership during a emergency is a bad idea? Worked for caesar (for a while).
Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Did you know that it's impossible to contract the virus in a crowd of 250 or less? But if it's 251, you're gonna catch it for sure.

Seriously, when you hear stuff like this it makes you wonder what's really going on.


You know why Irish chili only has 239 beans?

Because if it had one more it would be too farty (must be said in a brought to get the joke)
Author:  Regular Reader [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
good dolphin wrote:
Caller bob is dumb but correct

I’ll let juices lecture notes explain why to you


^this. Besides the dumb part.
Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
He's not the only one to do it. And yes, the government does have the authority to do this in an emergency.


:lol: No. That's why we have a Constitution. Government will fuck you straight up the ass and use "emergency" as the reason to do so.

Pathetic. You’d be a sheep easily led to slaughter.
Author:  Nas [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Spaulding wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Did you know that it's impossible to contract the virus in a crowd of 250 or less? But if it's 251, you're gonna catch it for sure.

Seriously, when you hear stuff like this it makes you wonder what's really going on.


Yeah. I can't figure it out.


It's not difficult to understand that they don't want large crowds to reduce the chances of MANY people contracting the coronavirus. The arbitrary number is used so people can understand what they mean.
Author:  Darkside [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Regular Reader wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller bob is dumb but correct

I’ll let juices lecture notes explain why to you


^this. Besides the dumb part.

Please elaborate
Author:  SpiralStairs [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Darkside wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller bob is dumb but correct

I’ll let juices lecture notes explain why to you

Which other fundamental rights are eligible for suspension? Can they refuse a speedy trial because a judge can be exposed to someone on trial who has been exposed to thousands in jail? Can we suspend the election because changing leadership during a emergency is a bad idea? Worked for caesar (for a while).


Speedy trial rights have been tolled for quite some time. Just ask the folks that have been in jail for the past 2 or 3 years awaiting trial.

Don't see you starting alarmist threads about that for some reason.........
Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Darkside wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller bob is dumb but correct

I’ll let juices lecture notes explain why to you

Which other fundamental rights are eligible for suspension? Can they refuse a speedy trial because a judge can be exposed to someone on trial who has been exposed to thousands in jail? Can we suspend the election because changing leadership during a emergency is a bad idea? Worked for caesar (for a while).


Just about everything. Maybe, as that tyrant suspended habeas corpus and it was upheld by the Supreme Court. Yes, most definitely

The executive can easily slide into dictatorship and has been leaning that way for at least 20 years
Author:  Darkside [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller bob is dumb but correct

I’ll let juices lecture notes explain why to you

Which other fundamental rights are eligible for suspension? Can they refuse a speedy trial because a judge can be exposed to someone on trial who has been exposed to thousands in jail? Can we suspend the election because changing leadership during a emergency is a bad idea? Worked for caesar (for a while).


Speedy trial rights have been tolled for quite some time. Just ask the folks that have been in jail for the past 2 or 3 years awaiting trial.

Don't see you starting alarmist threads about that for some reason.........

How often does this happen? Alarmist threads? The heck does that mean?
Author:  Nas [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Darkside wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller bob is dumb but correct

I’ll let juices lecture notes explain why to you

Which other fundamental rights are eligible for suspension? Can they refuse a speedy trial because a judge can be exposed to someone on trial who has been exposed to thousands in jail? Can we suspend the election because changing leadership during a emergency is a bad idea? Worked for caesar (for a while).


Speedy trial rights have been tolled for quite some time. Just ask the folks that have been in jail for the past 2 or 3 years awaiting trial.

Don't see you starting alarmist threads about that for some reason.........

How often does this happen? Alarmist threads? The heck does that mean?


It happens all the time. Primarily because excessive bonds are given in cases the state can't win. Can't lose them either if you delay trial for years until the person accepts a plea deal. Now the state/county has reduced the bonds. BRogue doesn't like that.
Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
As Carlin said, it’s not a bill of rights, it’s a bill of privileges
Author:  Rod [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
good dolphin wrote:
Maybe, as that tyrant suspended habeas corpus and it was upheld by the Supreme Court.


That was certainly tyrannical. There's no doubt about it. Ultimately an American citizen exercised his Second Amendment rights.
Author:  Darkside [ Thu Mar 12, 2020 10:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Is this legal?
Nas wrote:
Darkside wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Darkside wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Caller bob is dumb but correct

I’ll let juices lecture notes explain why to you

Which other fundamental rights are eligible for suspension? Can they refuse a speedy trial because a judge can be exposed to someone on trial who has been exposed to thousands in jail? Can we suspend the election because changing leadership during a emergency is a bad idea? Worked for caesar (for a while).


Speedy trial rights have been tolled for quite some time. Just ask the folks that have been in jail for the past 2 or 3 years awaiting trial.

Don't see you starting alarmist threads about that for some reason.........

How often does this happen? Alarmist threads? The heck does that mean?


It happens all the time. Primarily because excessive bonds are given in cases the state can't win. Can't lose them either if you delay trial for years until the person accepts a plea deal. Now the state/county has reduced the bonds. BRogue doesn't like that.

It does? For what kind of offenses? Where? Mainly cook?
Page 1 of 11 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/