good dolphin wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
I think if you’re a strict textualist the holding in Brown makes no sense
kind of true
a lawyer with bad intent could probably upset a lot of things
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Brown v Bored of Education https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=128291 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | SpiralStairs [ Thu Jun 30, 2022 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Brown v Bored of Education |
This case is pure judicial activism. How does a state law that states white schools and black schools are to be segregated, so long as they offer the same quality of education, deny one equal protection under the law? Even it were shown that black schools had fewer resources than white schools, the solution would be to bring those schools in line with white schools not order wholesale desegregation. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
Take this to politics or think tank. |
|
| Author: | SpiralStairs [ Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
Caller Bob wrote: Take this to politics or think tank. Caller JBills |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Thu Jun 30, 2022 9:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
spiralmike |
|
| Author: | Crick Ramp [ Thu Jun 30, 2022 9:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
Bore-ing |
|
| Author: | SpiralStairs [ Thu Jun 30, 2022 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
I think if you’re a strict textualist the holding in Brown makes no sense |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Thu Jun 30, 2022 9:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
I think you’re one of the worst lawyers in Kane county |
|
| Author: | SpiralStairs [ Thu Jun 30, 2022 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
Caller Bob wrote: I think you’re one of the worst lawyers in Kane county Bro u don’t even kno me |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Fri Jul 01, 2022 7:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
It should be a state's issue. Otherwise, pass an Amendment. |
|
| Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Fri Jul 01, 2022 8:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
Brick wrote: It should be a state's issue. Otherwise, pass an Amendment. There are some uncomfortable allies these days fighting for the right to segregate. That amendment may be tricky. |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Fri Jul 01, 2022 10:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
SpiralStairs wrote: I think if you’re a strict textualist the holding in Brown makes no sense kind of true a lawyer with bad intent could probably upset a lot of things |
|
| Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Fri Jul 01, 2022 11:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
good dolphin wrote: SpiralStairs wrote: I think if you’re a strict textualist the holding in Brown makes no sense kind of true a lawyer with bad intent could probably upset a lot of things
|
|
| Author: | The Missing Link [ Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brown v Bored of Education |
SpiralStairs wrote: This case is pure judicial activism. How does a state law that states white schools and black schools are to be segregated, so long as they offer the same quality of education, deny one equal protection under the law? Even it were shown that black schools had fewer resources than white schools, the solution would be to bring those schools in line with white schools not order wholesale desegregation. This is actually the basic premise behind CRT. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|