christianity is so real they had to rewrite it woke
and its due for another refresh
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| The case for Christ https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=132162 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | NWsider4-3-3 [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 12:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | The case for Christ |
i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’
|
|
| Author: | Minooka Meatball [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 4:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
k |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 6:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
NWsider4-3-3 wrote: i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’ There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today. |
|
| Author: | W_Z [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 7:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: NWsider4-3-3 wrote: i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’ There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today. I built a little empire out of some crazy garbage called the blood of the exploited working class; but they've overcome their shyness now they're calling me your highness; and a world screams "kiss me, son of god". |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 7:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: NWsider4-3-3 wrote: i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’ There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today. How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today? |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Seacrest wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: NWsider4-3-3 wrote: i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’ There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today. How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today? That's a fair point. |
|
| Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Seacrest wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: NWsider4-3-3 wrote: i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’ There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today. How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today? At least 70 million as of 2020. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Seacrest wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: NWsider4-3-3 wrote: i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’ There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today. How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today? At least 70 million as of 2020. 70 million people have a couple billion followers? |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
pittmike wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: Seacrest wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: NWsider4-3-3 wrote: i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’ There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today. How MANY of them have a couple of billion followers today? At least 70 million as of 2020. 70 million people have a couple billion followers? Plausibly |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 8:45 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Douchebag wrote: pittmike wrote: 70 million people have a couple billion followers? Plausibly Big if true. |
|
| Author: | NWsider4-3-3 [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: NWsider4-3-3 wrote: i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’ There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today. lots? who were they and who/what are their historical sources? why did non-christian human sources - who lived decades after Christ, document someone who was crucified in golgotha? |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
NWsider4-3-3 wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: NWsider4-3-3 wrote: i remember the book...this bit of news just came out: https://metro.co.uk/2024/06/12/experts-discover-earliest-record-jesus-christ-performing-a-miracle-21020745/ i call it the case, as in proving that Christ existed. there are many sources from Christ's era that referred to Him. i believe that 'case' has been proven. what compels this is the overwhelming negative comments from readers. yahoo had the same article and most of the comments told me that Christ never existed - no proof. this writing is apprx. 300-400 years after Christ lived - and some 800 years earlier than what was accepted as the Gospel of Thomas, which was about Christ's earliest years. Quote: Dr Gabriel Nocchi Macedo, from the University of Liège, said: ‘Our findings on this late antique Greek copy of the work confirm the current assessment that the Infancy Gospel according to Thomas was originally written in Greek.’ There were lots of lunatics running around claiming to be the Son of God in that era. Not much different than today. lots? who were they and who/what are their historical sources? why did non-christian human sources - who lived decades after Christ, document someone who was crucified in golgotha? Athronges, Theudas, and a bunch of other rebels and guys outside the Jewish establishment. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Was Christ indigenous? |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
pittmike wrote: Was Christ indigenous? No, he was white. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Christ was a great marketer like Trump. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Douchebag wrote: pittmike wrote: Was Christ indigenous? No, he was white. Fake news. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 10:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Nas wrote: Douchebag wrote: pittmike wrote: Was Christ indigenous? No, he was white. Fake news. And a WASP |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 11:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Douchebag wrote: Nas wrote: Douchebag wrote: pittmike wrote: Was Christ indigenous? No, he was white. Fake news. And a WASP Big if true. |
|
| Author: | Nardi [ Thu Jun 13, 2024 11:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
Douchebag wrote: pittmike wrote: Was Christ indigenous? No, he was white. I agree. I read the Old testament. Almighty Dad has all the traits of a cis white male. |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Sat Jun 15, 2024 11:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The case for Christ |
christianity is so real they had to rewrite it woke and its due for another refresh
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|