Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
NFL's Ugliest Cheerleaders? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=15466 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Killer V [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:29 am ] |
Post subject: | NFL's Ugliest Cheerleaders? |
I don't necesarily find any of them grotesque...well, maybe #3. http://www.dailyredundancy.com/media/cheer/10.html |
Author: | Bagels [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:32 am ] |
Post subject: | |
#9 and #3 are the worst |
Author: | hootmon [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:40 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I would say 9 and 6 both looked like they ran into parked cars. Number 3 is what, 45 years old? |
Author: | tmurf423 [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:44 am ] |
Post subject: | |
I would have to say 3 as well. |
Author: | Irish Boy [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:26 am ] |
Post subject: | |
3 is absolutely awful |
Author: | Mustang Rob [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:35 am ] |
Post subject: | |
# 3 is a man |
Author: | MattInTheCrown [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:41 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Yeah, #3 hands down. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Mustang Rob wrote: # 3 is a man
If #3 is a man, what does that make #5, a mannish boy? |
Author: | mike the tuba player [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
#10 Kind of a Rat Face #9 is what you call Fugly #5 Could be tucking it under, very man-like features in the face area |
Author: | MattInTheCrown [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I don't understand how #8 was put ahead of #9 on that list; #8 is a paper-bag away from being quite hot. |
Author: | HappyHour Jason [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 1:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I'd say it is a toss up between 9,5, and 3... |
Author: | spmack [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I think you guys should understand the difference between a chick that isn't so attractive and a bad pic. #7 is the worst. She looks Alsippian. |
Author: | hootmon [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 2:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
spmack wrote: I think you guys should understand the difference between a chick that isn't so attractive and a bad pic. #7 is the worst.
I had the same thought, so I went to the Dolphins web site and sorry to say, the picture of #3 we all saw is the BEST one. She is positively skeletal in a couple, where her ribs are poking out like a starving hyena. Her name isn't Claire, either. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 3:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
spmack wrote: I think you guys should understand the difference between a chick that isn't so attractive and a bad pic. #7 is the worst. She looks Alsippian.
Someone unpacked his adjectives today |
Author: | spmack [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 3:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I got that from the Jurktionary. That and "Assicular muscles" when referring to the sphincter. |
Author: | polster [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
#4 looks pretty cute... |
Author: | Jagr Bomb [ Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
spmack wrote: I got that from the Jurktionary. That and "Assicular muscles" when referring to the sphincter.
I have 30 seconds of the Jurktionary set as my ring tone - Generates a lot of questions and puzzled looks. I'd do all 10 in a heart beat. I've done worse. Tis all relative I voted for other |
Author: | HappyHour Jason [ Sat Oct 13, 2007 11:17 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Yikes... but it is O.K. to be burrito. |
Author: | Colonel Angus [ Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
3. |
Author: | polster [ Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Your President! |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |