Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

ESPN Body Issue 2012
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=71486
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:28 pm ]
Post subject:  ESPN Body Issue 2012

http://espn.go.com/espn/photos/gallery/_/id/8136693/bodies-want-2012

edit: Be warned. Naked dude is first picture.

Author:  SHARK [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

I could've sworn ESPN The Magazine did this issue once before...

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Image

Author:  good dolphin [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

not clicking

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

good dolphin wrote:
not clicking


Good call.

3 clicks in when I still had only seen naked dudes, I thought to myself, I'm only going to give this 30 or 40 more clicks before I call bullshit on any chicks being here.

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

If you click enough times you get through the naked dudes to see the naked chicks who look like dudes. If you click through them, then you get to a naked chick with no legs.

Bad issue.

Author:  Douchebag [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Now I know where Krazy Ivan has disappeared to recently...

Come back to the board KI

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Douchebag wrote:
Now I know where Krazy Ivan has disappeared to recently...

Come back to the board KI


Ivan is a chick with no legs??

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Big Chicagoan wrote:
If you click through them, then you get to a naked chick with no legs.



Yeah, that was......yeah....

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 4:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
If you click through them, then you get to a naked chick with no legs.



Yeah, that was......yeah....



It's the BODY issue... no one ever said anything about limbs.

Author:  KDdidit [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

A naked dude with a horse?

Author:  bigfan [ Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
If you click through them, then you get to a naked chick with no legs.



Yeah, that was......yeah....


Hanging from the rope??? SI really wanting to be talked about

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

http://espn.go.com/espnw/photos/gallery/_/id/8135372/bodies-want-2012

Just chicks this time. Different pics. Still one chick with no legs.

Author:  Gloopan Kuratz [ Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Candice Parker was a very pleasant surprise.

And the chick with no legs, .... I would.

Author:  good dolphin [ Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

not much good in the second group

the surfing picture under water is kind of hot

Author:  trickybeck [ Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Holy crap, Maurice Jones-Drew's thighs are enormous.

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

trickybeck wrote:
Holy crap, Maurice Jones-Drew's thighs are enormous.


Wait til you see his hog.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Hank Scorpio wrote:
trickybeck wrote:
Holy crap, Maurice Jones-Drew's thighs are enormous.


Wait til you see his hog.

Image

Author:  doug - evergreen park [ Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Candace Parker's triceps are bigger than my forearms.

Author:  FavreFan [ Wed Jul 11, 2012 8:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ESPN Body Issue 2012

Gloopan Kuratz wrote:
Candice Parker was a very pleasant surprise.

And the chick with no legs, .... I would.

No way. Candace was like a half point higher than the chick with no legs. Very manly. I honestly wouldn't.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/