It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 5:50 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19378
What exactly would he do? Ban assault weapons?

Vice President Joe Biden revealed that President Barack Obama might use an executive order to deal with guns.

"The president is going to act," said Biden, giving some comments to the press before a meeting with victims of gun violence. "There are executives orders, there's executive action that can be taken. We haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required."

Biden said that this is a moral issue and that "it's critically important that we act."

Biden talked also about taking responsible action. "As the president said, if you're actions result in only saving one life, they're worth taking. But I'm convinced we can affect the well-being of millions of americans and take thousands of people out of harm's way if we act responsibly."

Biden, as he himself noted, helped write the Brady bill.

Eric Holder was scheduled to be at the meeting that's currently take place at the White House.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Don't even know what to say anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
I'm cool with that...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19378
conns7901 wrote:

Biden said that this is a moral issue and that "it's critically important that we act."



It is also a moral issue to blow up kids in Pakistan with drone missiles. But that is ok so long as it is a Democrat making the call.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Quote:
"The president is going to act," said Biden, giving some comments to the press before a meeting with victims of gun violence. "There are executives orders, there's executive action that can be taken. We haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required."

Of course they are gonna use executive orders! That's how this administration gets shit done!

:?

conns7901 wrote:
conns7901 wrote:

Biden said that this is a moral issue and that "it's critically important that we act."



It is also a moral issue to blow up kids in Pakistan with drone missiles. But that is ok so long as it is a Democrat making the call.

Right. This administration is better off not using morality as justification for anything.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 33067
Location: Wrigley
pizza_Place: Warren Buffet of Cock
Separation of powers has been eroded with the courts and executive branches stealing much of the spoils. The courts tend to overrule properly enacted legislation even going as far as to help re-write the laws they overrule. The executive branch is clearly trying to make government work because of of do-nothing legislative bodies. Heck even Pat Quinn is talking about a pension commission that would be empowered to change the IL pension rules without legislative approval.

I don't agree with it, but I understand why it is happening.

_________________
Hawaii (fuck) You


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19378
It would also be nice if we lived in a state that wasn't in the business of repeatedly closing mental health facilities due to cost.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 3272
Location: Woodstock (not the trailer part)
pizza_Place: Jobu
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Don't even know what to say anymore.

Amen to that.

How amusing that Eric "The Gun Runner" Holder was an attendee. I guess that our innocent people are more important than innocent Mexican people.

_________________
1923-1927-1928-1932-1936-1937-1938-1939
1941-1943-1947-1949-1950-1951-1952-1953
1956-1958-1961-1962-1977-1978-1996-1998
1999-2000-2009
----------
XXI - XXV - XLII - XLVI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40651
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I bitched and moaned about a lot of things regarding Obama. He was reelected so I guess I am resigned to our fate. Of all the stuff about this guy really nothing pisses me off more than all this working around the edges. His executive order bs, his hiding everything (Bezhai, secret deals) and especially anything to do with that ass wipe Eric Holder simply kills me.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
stoneroses86 wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Don't even know what to say anymore.

Amen to that.

How amusing that Eric "The Gun Runner" Holder was an attendee. I guess that our innocent people are more important than innocent Mexican people.

If there is one thing this xenophobic administration has proven, it's that our innocent people are infinitely more important than innocent people from other countries.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
conns7901 wrote:
What exactly would he do? Ban assault weapons?

Vice President Joe Biden revealed that President Barack Obama might use an executive order to deal with guns.

"The president is going to act," said Biden, giving some comments to the press before a meeting with victims of gun violence. "There are executives orders, there's executive action that can be taken. We haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action that we believe is required."

Biden said that this is a moral issue and that "it's critically important that we act."

Biden talked also about taking responsible action. "As the president said, if you're actions result in only saving one life, they're worth taking. But I'm convinced we can affect the well-being of millions of americans and take thousands of people out of harm's way if we act responsibly."

Biden, as he himself noted, helped write the Brady bill.

Eric Holder was scheduled to be at the meeting that's currently take place at the White House.


More unconstitutional executive orders that will be decried from the throne room, but remember...they must do something. A ban on any type of firearm won't lead to a decrease in gun violence and gun crime is the last thing on their minds. They know this. I'm sure some national gun registry will be attempted even though it totally failed in Canada, they also know this. They want the guns, they don't care how they get them, how long it takes they just want guns out of the hands of the citizens. Politicians past and present have said as much.

Remember, the Constitution and our rights as citizens and human beings aren't something held in reverence by our elected officials, no, they are simply road blocks, inconveniences and things to work around to an ultimate goal, whatever that may be.

The governments motherfucking dream is to have a disarmed populace.

Bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
deal with it?

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
Krazy Ivan wrote:
deal with it?


Do you have anything to add?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Krazy Ivan wrote:
deal with it?


Is this a bit?

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:17 pm
Posts: 17678
Location: The Leviathan
pizza_Place: Frozen
Considering we have no idea what action this would be, I find Ivans response just as logical as anyone elses in this thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
SomeGuy wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
deal with it?


Do you have anything to add?


Well. I admit to having a huge bias when it comes to guns and would blindly be in support of most anything that would take them out of the hands of civilians. I've been told (repeatedly) that it isn't realistic, so I recuse myself from the discussion and may choose to chime in with a humorous ( :scratch: )
quip later on in the thread...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Don Tiny wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
deal with it?


Is this a bit?

No. It's standard fare response from someone when their guy is in office. Bush backers pretty much had the same attitude.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
FavreFan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
deal with it?


Is this a bit?

No. It's standard fare response from someone when their guy is in office. Bush backers pretty much had the same attitude.


Read.

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:41 am
Posts: 817
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
stoneroses86 wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Don't even know what to say anymore.

Amen to that.

How amusing that Eric "The Gun Runner" Holder was an attendee. I guess that our innocent people are more important than innocent Mexican people.

If there is one thing this xenophobic administration has proven, it's that our innocent people are infinitely more important than innocent people from other countries.


I was complaining about the drone strikes before you were but IMO as president of our country he should feel that way. I know that's fucked up but I would have an even bigger problem if he didn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:58 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Constitution lesson on how bills become Laws.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ_4LQ96Pds

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 3272
Location: Woodstock (not the trailer part)
pizza_Place: Jobu
lipidquadcab wrote:
Considering we have no idea what action this would be, I find Ivans response just as logical as anyone elses in this thread.

This is very true. I think, however, that one may safely presume that any action from this man will not expand the protections afforded by the Second Amendment.

_________________
1923-1927-1928-1932-1936-1937-1938-1939
1941-1943-1947-1949-1950-1951-1952-1953
1956-1958-1961-1962-1977-1978-1996-1998
1999-2000-2009
----------
XXI - XXV - XLII - XLVI


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:41 am
Posts: 817
pizza_Place: Giordano's
lipidquadcab wrote:
Considering we have no idea what action this would be, I find Ivans response just as logical as anyone elses in this thread.


Exactly! It's possible he may deal with the mental health issues.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Seacrest wrote:
Constitution lesson on how bills become Laws.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ_4LQ96Pds



Better

http://youtu.be/72e1cR2i3ag

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:41 am
Posts: 817
pizza_Place: Giordano's
stoneroses86 wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
Considering we have no idea what action this would be, I find Ivans response just as logical as anyone elses in this thread.

This is very true. I think, however, that one may safely presume that any action from this man will not expand the protections afforded by the Second Amendment.


Except in his first term they did. The NRA still gave him an F.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Makaveli wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
stoneroses86 wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Don't even know what to say anymore.

Amen to that.

How amusing that Eric "The Gun Runner" Holder was an attendee. I guess that our innocent people are more important than innocent Mexican people.

If there is one thing this xenophobic administration has proven, it's that our innocent people are infinitely more important than innocent people from other countries.


I was complaining about the drone strikes before you were but IMO as president of our country he should feel that way. I know that's fucked up but I would have an even bigger problem if he didn't.

That's when I was posting here like twice a year, but Im pretty sure it was one of the first things I mentioned when I got back to logging in here regularly. And it seems like I have a bigger problem with it than you do, but that is insignificant towards this discussion. In regards to the second part of your post, I know many people who feel the same way and I don't blame them for feeling that way even though I don't. I just dont think it justifies some of the actions taken by the Obama administration.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:03 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38362
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Constitution lesson on how bills become Laws.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ_4LQ96Pds



Better

http://youtu.be/72e1cR2i3ag



Better for who?

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Makaveli wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
Considering we have no idea what action this would be, I find Ivans response just as logical as anyone elses in this thread.


Exactly! It's possible he may deal with the mental health issues.

If his executive order in no way deals with taking any more rights/privelages/protections/whatever from US citizens, and instead focuses on improving mental health conditions and awareness, I will gladly apologize for prematurely criticizing. However, as SR pointed out, it can be very reasonably presumed that Biden is talking about dealing with guns in the executive order.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Krazy Ivan wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
deal with it?


Is this a bit?

No. It's standard fare response from someone when their guy is in office. Bush backers pretty much had the same attitude.


Read.

I do. It's fuuuuuun-damental.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Krazy Ivan wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
Constitution lesson on how bills become Laws.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ_4LQ96Pds



Better

http://youtu.be/72e1cR2i3ag


Best

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pl3sgKj6oTQ

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Makaveli wrote:
stoneroses86 wrote:
lipidquadcab wrote:
Considering we have no idea what action this would be, I find Ivans response just as logical as anyone elses in this thread.

This is very true. I think, however, that one may safely presume that any action from this man will not expand the protections afforded by the Second Amendment.


Except in his first term they did. The NRA still gave him an F.

Things change. He was also against gay marriage in his first term.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group