jimmypasta wrote:
I guess the jury was stumped.
Take a lap
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Blade Runner Not Guilty https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=89080 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Blade Runner Not Guilty |
Of pre-meditated murder. Could still be found guilty of culpable homicide for which he would probably get 5 years. Pretty surprised by this. |
|
| Author: | T-Bone [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
Why are you surprised? I don't know that much about the case but I would have guessed that he hadn't planned in advance to kill the girl. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
I guess the jury was stumped. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
jimmypasta wrote: I guess the jury was stumped. Take a lap
|
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
jimmypasta wrote: I guess the jury was stumped. Not a jury trial. Judge only. That said, not an entirely unamusing post ... |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
Don Tiny wrote: jimmypasta wrote: I guess the jury was stumped. Not a jury trial. Judge only. That said, not an entirely unamusing post ... I knew that,but I wanted to see who would correct me instead of giving me a
|
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
Not guilty? It's obviously Pittmike's fault. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
Guilty of culpable homicide. He could serve up to 15 years, but since he is rich it sounds like he may not serve any time at all. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
SomeGuy wrote: Not guilty? It's obviously Pittmike's fault. He should have gotten to the wife first. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 8:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Guilty of culpable homicide. He could serve up to 15 years, but since he is rich it sounds like he may not serve any time at all. I knew he didn't have a leg to stand on! |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Blade Runner Not Guilty |
T-Bone wrote: Why are you surprised? I don't know that much about the case but I would have guessed that he hadn't planned in advance to kill the girl. I disagree. I thought the evidence and common sense clearly laid out a fight between the two in which she locked herself in the bathroom. He rolled his Lt. Dan ass off the bed, grabbed his gun, and unloaded it into the door. Then spent an hour trying to think of what to do, before having his security report it. That sure as hell isn't manslaughter. Premeditated can mean only a few moments where he picked up the gun with intent to kill her. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|