Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=96518
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Don Tiny [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 11:54 am ]
Post subject:  Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/10/07/trump-supporters-have-the-worst-grammar-study-finds/?tid=sm_fb

Something to kill some time while pushing mud. There's text and, if you like, an infographic as well.

Author:  Gloopan Kuratz [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

Nice infographic.

Chaffee's supporters have very good grammar.

Author:  FavreFan [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

All seems like common sense stuff to me. The larger a pool of people is, the dumber that pool will be, and generally speaking republicans are dumber than democrats.

Author:  jimmypasta [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

FavreFan wrote:
All seems like common sense stuff to me. The larger a pool of people is, the dumber that pool will be, and generally speaking republicans are dumber than democrats.


Image

Author:  good dolphin [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

Isn't pushing mud a euphemism for anal sex?

Author:  Don Tiny [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

good dolphin wrote:
Isn't pushing mud a euphemism for anal sex?


Not that I'm aware of, although you're certainly welcome to read it during that activity if it suits you.

Author:  Matches Malone [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

good dolphin wrote:
Isn't pushing mud a euphemism for anal sex?


Image

Author:  ChicagoEd [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 1:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

FavreFan wrote:
All seems like common sense stuff to me. The larger a pool of people is, the dumber that pool will be, and generally speaking republicans are dumber than democrats.


Brilliant observation. No proof for this crap of a thought.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 1:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

ChicagoEd wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
All seems like common sense stuff to me. The larger a pool of people is, the dumber that pool will be, and generally speaking republicans are dumber than democrats.


Brilliant observation. No proof for this crap of a thought.


https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/th ... servatives

http://www.businessinsider.com/proof-re ... ats-2012-5

http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/andre ... iberal-too

So the science is kind of split.

Maybe one of our resident scientists can help.

Author:  chaspoppcap [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

good dolphin wrote:
Isn't pushing mud a euphemism for anal sex?


Beats me.

Author:  8675309 [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

FavreFan wrote:
All seems like common sense stuff to me. The larger a pool of people is, the dumber that pool will be, and generally speaking republicans are dumber than democrats.

Generally of course......like
I before E except after C,
or when used as an A, as in neighbor or weigh.
I guess you're the Rottweiler of the Biden brain trust.
Image

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

I thought that was a pic of James Woods at first


Woods is like a literal genius and very conservative (kind of nutty)

Author:  veganfan21 [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 3:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

8675309 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
All seems like common sense stuff to me. The larger a pool of people is, the dumber that pool will be, and generally speaking republicans are dumber than democrats.

Generally of course......like
I before E except after C,
or when used as an A, as in neighbor or weigh.
I guess you're the Rottweiler of the Biden brain trust.


What you're describing is spelling, not grammar.

Author:  8675309 [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 3:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

veganfan21 wrote:
8675309 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
All seems like common sense stuff to me. The larger a pool of people is, the dumber that pool will be, and generally speaking republicans are dumber than democrats.

Generally of course......like
I before E except after C,
or when used as an A, as in neighbor or weigh.
I guess you're the Rottweiler of the Biden brain trust.


What you're describing is spelling, not grammar.


What if C-A-T spelled dog......
Image

To greater and lesser degrees through history, citizens have trusted that their government officials will act in their best interests, not lie to them, and generally conduct themselves in an honorable fashion.

Author:  FavreFan [ Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Poor Grammar as it Relates to Presidential Candidates

:lol: @ all the butt hurt in this thread. Yes, generally conservatives are dumber than liberals. Of course there are exceptions. I don't see any of those exceptions in this thread though.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/