It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:12 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
I was bored for a little while, but the ending was worth it.

The recreation of 1969 Hollywood streets, vehicles, and sets was outstanding.

Pitt and DiCaprio also killed it.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 10:22 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31609
pizza_Place: What??
Jbi11s wrote:
I was bored for a little while, but the ending was worth it.

The recreation of 1969 Hollywood streets, vehicles, and sets was outstanding.

Pitt and DiCaprio also killed it.

Was never impressed with DiCaprio...until this movie. I just never believed him in any role where he was hard scrabbled. Now I do.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2020 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
I am going to see this tonight in 70mm at the Music Box.

Nice knowing you all.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2020 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
There are 5 people in this theater other than me and my old lady.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2020 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
We're gonna go sit on either side of somebody, see what happens.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 16, 2020 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:31 pm
Posts: 8788
pizza_Place: Bojono's on Clarendon
Good flick.

_________________
I don't remember half the time if I'm hiding or I'm lost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2020 7:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4758
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
I finally got around to watching this the last two days, because I had to wait a month to check it out from the library.

While I appreciate Tarantino's attempt to capture Hollywood in the 60s, the movie fails on a number of different levels. Most of all, the script is bad. Secondly, Leonardo's acting sucks. He over-acted the whole movie, so that his character was a caricature. When he was put in the Steve McQueen part in the Great Escape, it made me realize how weak of an actor he is compared to great actors like McQueen. I didn't feel like Margot Robbie was anyone other than Margot Robbie, when she was supposed to be Sharon Tate. In all fairness, no one could have played Sharon Tate. The Manson family story-line was nonsensical and didn't fit. Al Pacino and Brad Pitt were both ok. Many of the scenes were just boring and pointless, like the Tate character going to the theater to see herself. The flamethrower scene at the end was comical, that the woman just stood there in the pool and allowed herself to be shot with flames.

I doubt Tarantino will make another, because this one was so bad. If the script had not come from Tarantino, no studio would have made this film.

One star out of four, and really only for Pitt's performance.


Last edited by Dignified Rube on Tue Mar 17, 2020 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2020 7:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43565
Which character was a closeted homo in this one?

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2020 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4758
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Douchebag wrote:
Which character was a closeted homo in this one?


You.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2020 7:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43565
Dignified Rube wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Which character was a closeted homo in this one?


You.

You wish, sugar tits.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2020 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10792
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Douchebag wrote:
Which character was a closeted homo in this one?

This guy gets it

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2020 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43565
BigW72 wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Which character was a closeted homo in this one?

This guy gets it

We should just create a thread for all of Rube's terrible movie thoughts. They should all be consolidated in one place.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 17, 2020 1:26 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31609
pizza_Place: What??
Douchebag wrote:
BigW72 wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Which character was a closeted homo in this one?

This guy gets it

We should just create a thread for all of Rube's terrible movie thoughts. They should all be consolidated in one place.

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 26, 2020 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
On Starz now.

So good.

Also, Rube’s movie thoughts are otherworldly bad.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2021 6:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2503
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Finally got around to seeing this one. As others have said, the ending is kick ass. Also, the Brad Pitt character is absolutely awesome. However, most of it is just Tarantino porn. How many scenes of people driving around listening to 1960's radio do we need? That being said, my father, who is 74, really geeked out on the late 60's vibes. Second tier Tarantino.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2021 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Ive seen this 3x now, really liked this movie. Leo killed it, much better than expected.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 28, 2021 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Warren Newson wrote:
Finally got around to seeing this one. As others have said, the ending is kick ass. Also, the Brad Pitt character is absolutely awesome. However, most of it is just Tarantino porn. How many scenes of people driving around listening to 1960's radio do we need? That being said, my father, who is 74, really geeked out on the late 60's vibes. Second tier Tarantino.


My parents also loved the set design and attention to 1960s era detail.

If it is 2nd tier Tarantino then it’s the best of that lot.

Agree with 312, Leo really brought it in this film.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 29, 2021 2:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13328
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Jbi11s wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
Finally got around to seeing this one. As others have said, the ending is kick ass. Also, the Brad Pitt character is absolutely awesome. However, most of it is just Tarantino porn. How many scenes of people driving around listening to 1960's radio do we need? That being said, my father, who is 74, really geeked out on the late 60's vibes. Second tier Tarantino.


My parents also loved the set design and attention to 1960s era detail.

If it is 2nd tier Tarantino then it’s the best of that lot.

Agree with 312, Leo really brought it in this film.


Agreed with the above views. One of the best movies I've seen in the last five years.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2022 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24549
pizza_Place: It's gone
Saw this movie last night with no information coming in.

What was the entire point of this movie? It rambled on and on. The plot was pretty stupid and introduced too late.

I later learned it was about the Manson murders.

What I did like was how they created 1969 and the entire Hollywood scene. The way they made Brad Pitt look was exceptional. He looked just like a guy would look in 1969.

So was this like Inglorious Bastards where it was a fantasy about changing history? I liked that movie and it was cool to see Hitler get killed but in this movie, I really didnt give a shit about Tate and Polanski. Why should I care for some nose in the air Hollywood douchebags.

So all this was was a pat on hollywood's own back on how they can recreate a different era when they have enough budget.

I liked the acting and the recreation of that era but as a movie with story and plot, it was weak.

3/5 Stars.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2022 5:59 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31609
pizza_Place: What??
It ain't Batman, but it's alright.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 02, 2022 9:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13328
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Observer wrote:
Saw this movie last night with no information coming in.

What was the entire point of this movie? It rambled on and on. The plot was pretty stupid and introduced too late.

I later learned it was about the Manson murders.

What I did like was how they created 1969 and the entire Hollywood scene. The way they made Brad Pitt look was exceptional. He looked just like a guy would look in 1969.

So was this like Inglorious Bastards where it was a fantasy about changing history? I liked that movie and it was cool to see Hitler get killed but in this movie, I really didnt give a shit about Tate and Polanski. Why should I care for some nose in the air Hollywood douchebags.

So all this was was a pat on hollywood's own back on how they can recreate a different era when they have enough budget.

I liked the acting and the recreation of that era but as a movie with story and plot, it was weak.

3/5 Stars.


Because Tate was stabbed to death while pregnant, all the while begging them not to so her baby could live.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 111 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group