It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:08 am
Posts: 892
I realized San Diego gave up a lot to get the 37th pick, but I wonder how the draft would have looked if the bears kept that pick. Also, with this trade it basically meant Thomas Jones was worth a third round pick this year and next year.

_________________
May 1, 2007 - CSFMB Civil War
“Those who don’t remember history are doomed to repeat it.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:06 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
I don't think they could have passed on getting all of the extra picks from SD.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:08 am
Posts: 892
So you think they would have drafted Jarret? I dont get the DE draft. Are they going to let Ogunleye go?

_________________
May 1, 2007 - CSFMB Civil War
“Those who don’t remember history are doomed to repeat it.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Yeah, getting that many picks is huge. But I would have liked to have seen them take Sidney Rice if they kept that pick.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:38 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Quote:
So you think they would have drafted Jarret?


According to one report in the Tribune, the Bears were interested in Gonzalez from Ohio St. When he went to Indy at #32, they decided to trade down.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 10:41 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Quote:
I think Ogunleye has to take a pay cut or he might become a cap casualty. They have gotten equal production from him and Brown even though Brown makes a 1/3 of Oguleye's salary. With the emergence of Mark Anderson as a play maker that decision would make the most sense to me.


If Anderson proves capable of containing the run, Ogunleye will be gone.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
This will be a year of shaking out for the Bear DE situation. I think it would be premature to cut anyone.

Maybe this is JA's way of telling Rosenhaus that he is bringing some friends to the rodgering. First Briggs will play for the 7.5 million and then Adewale will have to renegotiate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82220
In thinking about #37, I would have been sorely diappointed if they did not draft one of the top guards. Most of the guys at that level were guards who could play tackle. It would have been nice to have someone who would be better than St. Clair to back up our aging tackles. In trading down they got a guard who was just a notch below my Grubbs-Sears-Texas guy picks. Beekman can play G-C which also comes in handy.

In the end I see almost no negative impact to the move. They got a guard I liked while getting three additional picks, including a day 1 next year.

I'll take it a step further here and set myself up to be crapped: Cedric Benson-Garrett Wolfe will be as productive as Thomas Jones-Cedric Benson of 2006.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:10 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 12:45 am
Posts: 13529
Location: People's Republic of Urbana
pizza_Place: Papa Dells
Quote:
good dolphin wrote:
I'll take it a step further here and set myself up to be crapped: Cedric Benson-Garrett Wolfe will be as productive as Thomas Jones-Cedric Benson of 2006.


Agreed dolphin, I watched Turner down here for far too long. He didn't do many things right but, one thing he was able to exploit offensively was a scat back. Rocky Harvey comes to mind. Turner will be able to dust off some of that playbook and use Wolfe for about 8-10 plays a game with great success.
I am looking forward to seeing Wolfe in the fourth quarter after Benson has softened up the D, could be exciting.

_________________
We all have private ails. The troublemakers are they who need public cures for their private ails.- Eric Hoffer


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: This Ends in Antioch and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group